Transcendental idealism and structuralism
The author examines possible analogies between Kant’s transcendental idealism and de Saussure’s and Levi-Strauss’s structuralism, in order to analyse if the former can be understood as a predecessor for the later. The author shows that both teachings assume a priori formal framework, but they diverg...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Langue: | EN FR SR |
| Publié: |
University of Belgrade
2016
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/4dde51e636bf483b9ded5e9bcfe53cfc |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4dde51e636bf483b9ded5e9bcfe53cfc |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4dde51e636bf483b9ded5e9bcfe53cfc2021-12-02T07:17:39ZTranscendental idealism and structuralism0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/4dde51e636bf483b9ded5e9bcfe53cfc2016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://eap-iea.org/novi-ojs/index.php/eap/article/view/296https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801The author examines possible analogies between Kant’s transcendental idealism and de Saussure’s and Levi-Strauss’s structuralism, in order to analyse if the former can be understood as a predecessor for the later. The author shows that both teachings assume a priori formal framework, but they diverge in the ways they describe it, as well as in understanding of its function. Consequently, the author concludes that structuralism can be seen as one possible use of Kant’s idea about the existence of such a frame. Furthermore, the author claims that Ricker’s understanding of structuralism as ‘Kantianism without transcendental subject’ should be rejected, since a teaching which does not assume existence of such subject cannot be understood as Kantian.Ivan VukovićUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 4, Iss 2 (2016) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN FR SR |
| topic |
Anthropology GN1-890 |
| spellingShingle |
Anthropology GN1-890 Ivan Vuković Transcendental idealism and structuralism |
| description |
The author examines possible analogies between Kant’s transcendental idealism and de Saussure’s and Levi-Strauss’s structuralism, in order to analyse if the former can be understood as a predecessor for the later. The author shows that both teachings assume a priori formal framework, but they diverge in the ways they describe it, as well as in understanding of its function. Consequently, the author concludes that structuralism can be seen as one possible use of Kant’s idea about the existence of such a frame. Furthermore, the author claims that Ricker’s understanding of structuralism as ‘Kantianism without transcendental subject’ should be rejected, since a teaching which does not assume existence of such subject cannot be understood as Kantian. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Ivan Vuković |
| author_facet |
Ivan Vuković |
| author_sort |
Ivan Vuković |
| title |
Transcendental idealism and structuralism |
| title_short |
Transcendental idealism and structuralism |
| title_full |
Transcendental idealism and structuralism |
| title_fullStr |
Transcendental idealism and structuralism |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Transcendental idealism and structuralism |
| title_sort |
transcendental idealism and structuralism |
| publisher |
University of Belgrade |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/4dde51e636bf483b9ded5e9bcfe53cfc |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT ivanvukovic transcendentalidealismandstructuralism |
| _version_ |
1718399514943946752 |