Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio

Tao Ming Thomas Chia,1 Minh T Nguyen,2 Hoon C Jung3,4 1Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Univer...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Chia TMT, Nguyen MT, Jung HC
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:	Cataract intraocular lens optical biometry ultrasound biometry Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4df29edccbc248ce98722e27de83fe87
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4df29edccbc248ce98722e27de83fe87
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4df29edccbc248ce98722e27de83fe872021-12-02T03:08:24ZComparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/4df29edccbc248ce98722e27de83fe872018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-optical-biometry-versus-ultrasound-biometry-in-cases-wit-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Tao Ming Thomas Chia,1 Minh T Nguyen,2 Hoon C Jung3,4 1Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; 4Eye Clinic, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA Purpose: To ascertain if optical biometry determination of axial length (AL) and intraocular lens (IOL) power is significantly different compared to ultrasound (US) biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).Patients and methods: Sixty patients who had cataract and IOL Master biometry with borderline SNR (1.6–2.0) were included. A retrospective chart review was performed to compare data collected with optical biometry and US biometry in cataract cases with borderline SNR.Results: Results showed that optical biometry IOL and AL measurements were not significantly different from the US measurements. Analysis also demonstrated good agreement between the two methods.Conclusion: Our study suggests that, in cases of borderline quality data, IOL power and AL measurements with optical biometry are still useful in surgical planning and that additional US measurements may be used more as a corroborative tool. Keywords: cataract, intraocular lens, optical biometry, ultrasound biometryChia TMTNguyen MTJung HCDove Medical PressarticleCataractintraocular lensoptical biometryultrasound biometryOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 12, Pp 1757-1762 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Cataract intraocular lens optical biometry ultrasound biometry Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	Cataract intraocular lens optical biometry ultrasound biometry Ophthalmology RE1-994 Chia TMT Nguyen MT Jung HC Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio
description	Tao Ming Thomas Chia,1 Minh T Nguyen,2 Hoon C Jung3,4 1Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; 4Eye Clinic, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA Purpose: To ascertain if optical biometry determination of axial length (AL) and intraocular lens (IOL) power is significantly different compared to ultrasound (US) biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).Patients and methods: Sixty patients who had cataract and IOL Master biometry with borderline SNR (1.6–2.0) were included. A retrospective chart review was performed to compare data collected with optical biometry and US biometry in cataract cases with borderline SNR.Results: Results showed that optical biometry IOL and AL measurements were not significantly different from the US measurements. Analysis also demonstrated good agreement between the two methods.Conclusion: Our study suggests that, in cases of borderline quality data, IOL power and AL measurements with optical biometry are still useful in surgical planning and that additional US measurements may be used more as a corroborative tool. Keywords: cataract, intraocular lens, optical biometry, ultrasound biometry
format	article
author	Chia TMT Nguyen MT Jung HC
author_facet	Chia TMT Nguyen MT Jung HC
author_sort	Chia TMT
title	Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio
title_short	Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio
title_full	Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio
title_fullStr	Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio
title_sort	comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/4df29edccbc248ce98722e27de83fe87
work_keys_str_mv	AT chiatmt comparisonofopticalbiometryversusultrasoundbiometryincaseswithborderlinesignaltonoiseratio AT nguyenmt comparisonofopticalbiometryversusultrasoundbiometryincaseswithborderlinesignaltonoiseratio AT junghc comparisonofopticalbiometryversusultrasoundbiometryincaseswithborderlinesignaltonoiseratio
_version_	1718401915179499520

Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio

Ejemplares similares