A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice

Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sean Paul Teeling, Carmel Davies, Marlize Barnard, Laserina O’Connor, Alice Coffey, Veronica Lambert, Martin McNamara, Dympna Tuohy, Timothy Frawley, Catherine Redmond, Suja Somanadhan, Mary Casey, Yvonne Corcoran, Owen Doody, Denise O’Brien, Maria Noonan, Rita Smith, Carmel Bradshaw, Sylvia Murphy, Liz Dore, Rosemary Lyons, Máire McGeehan, Anne Gallen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4e078bc2f52f45d8a58c8c6e7e503725
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4e078bc2f52f45d8a58c8c6e7e503725
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4e078bc2f52f45d8a58c8c6e7e5037252021-11-25T17:49:38ZA Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice10.3390/ijerph1822119321660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/4e078bc2f52f45d8a58c8c6e7e5037252021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11932https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informed by RAMESES II standards was conducted as an efficient means to synthesize evidence using an expert panel. The review involved research question development, quality appraisal, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Six program theories summarised below identify the key characteristics that promote positive outcomes in QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 1: Focuses on the evidence base and accessibility of the QCP-M and their ease of use by nurses and midwives working in busy and complex care environments. Program Theory 2: Examines the influence of external factors on QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 3: Relates to existing cultures and systems within clinical sites. Program Theory 4: Relates to nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge and beliefs. Program Theory 5: Builds on the staff theme of Programme Theory four, extending the culture of organizational learning, and highlights the meaningful engagement of nurses and midwives in the implementation process as a key characteristic of success. Program Theory 6: Relates to patient needs. The results provide nursing and midwifery policymakers and professionals with evidence-based program theory that can be translated into action-orientated strategies to help guide successful QCP-M implementation.Sean Paul TeelingCarmel DaviesMarlize BarnardLaserina O’ConnorAlice CoffeyVeronica LambertMartin McNamaraDympna TuohyTimothy FrawleyCatherine RedmondSuja SomanadhanMary CaseyYvonne CorcoranOwen DoodyDenise O’BrienMaria NoonanRita SmithCarmel BradshawSylvia MurphyLiz DoreRosemary LyonsMáire McGeehanAnne GallenMDPI AGarticlequality metricsnursingmidwiferyimplementationrealistpersonMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11932, p 11932 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic quality metrics
nursing
midwifery
implementation
realist
person
Medicine
R
spellingShingle quality metrics
nursing
midwifery
implementation
realist
person
Medicine
R
Sean Paul Teeling
Carmel Davies
Marlize Barnard
Laserina O’Connor
Alice Coffey
Veronica Lambert
Martin McNamara
Dympna Tuohy
Timothy Frawley
Catherine Redmond
Suja Somanadhan
Mary Casey
Yvonne Corcoran
Owen Doody
Denise O’Brien
Maria Noonan
Rita Smith
Carmel Bradshaw
Sylvia Murphy
Liz Dore
Rosemary Lyons
Máire McGeehan
Anne Gallen
A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
description Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informed by RAMESES II standards was conducted as an efficient means to synthesize evidence using an expert panel. The review involved research question development, quality appraisal, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Six program theories summarised below identify the key characteristics that promote positive outcomes in QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 1: Focuses on the evidence base and accessibility of the QCP-M and their ease of use by nurses and midwives working in busy and complex care environments. Program Theory 2: Examines the influence of external factors on QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 3: Relates to existing cultures and systems within clinical sites. Program Theory 4: Relates to nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge and beliefs. Program Theory 5: Builds on the staff theme of Programme Theory four, extending the culture of organizational learning, and highlights the meaningful engagement of nurses and midwives in the implementation process as a key characteristic of success. Program Theory 6: Relates to patient needs. The results provide nursing and midwifery policymakers and professionals with evidence-based program theory that can be translated into action-orientated strategies to help guide successful QCP-M implementation.
format article
author Sean Paul Teeling
Carmel Davies
Marlize Barnard
Laserina O’Connor
Alice Coffey
Veronica Lambert
Martin McNamara
Dympna Tuohy
Timothy Frawley
Catherine Redmond
Suja Somanadhan
Mary Casey
Yvonne Corcoran
Owen Doody
Denise O’Brien
Maria Noonan
Rita Smith
Carmel Bradshaw
Sylvia Murphy
Liz Dore
Rosemary Lyons
Máire McGeehan
Anne Gallen
author_facet Sean Paul Teeling
Carmel Davies
Marlize Barnard
Laserina O’Connor
Alice Coffey
Veronica Lambert
Martin McNamara
Dympna Tuohy
Timothy Frawley
Catherine Redmond
Suja Somanadhan
Mary Casey
Yvonne Corcoran
Owen Doody
Denise O’Brien
Maria Noonan
Rita Smith
Carmel Bradshaw
Sylvia Murphy
Liz Dore
Rosemary Lyons
Máire McGeehan
Anne Gallen
author_sort Sean Paul Teeling
title A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
title_short A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
title_full A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
title_fullStr A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
title_full_unstemmed A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
title_sort rapid realist review of quality care process metrics implementation in nursing and midwifery practice
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4e078bc2f52f45d8a58c8c6e7e503725
work_keys_str_mv AT seanpaulteeling arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT carmeldavies arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT marlizebarnard arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT laserinaoconnor arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT alicecoffey arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT veronicalambert arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT martinmcnamara arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT dympnatuohy arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT timothyfrawley arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT catherineredmond arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT sujasomanadhan arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT marycasey arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT yvonnecorcoran arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT owendoody arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT deniseobrien arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT marianoonan arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT ritasmith arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT carmelbradshaw arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT sylviamurphy arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT lizdore arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT rosemarylyons arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT mairemcgeehan arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT annegallen arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT seanpaulteeling rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT carmeldavies rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT marlizebarnard rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT laserinaoconnor rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT alicecoffey rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT veronicalambert rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT martinmcnamara rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT dympnatuohy rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT timothyfrawley rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT catherineredmond rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT sujasomanadhan rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT marycasey rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT yvonnecorcoran rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT owendoody rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT deniseobrien rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT marianoonan rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT ritasmith rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT carmelbradshaw rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT sylviamurphy rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT lizdore rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT rosemarylyons rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT mairemcgeehan rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
AT annegallen rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice
_version_ 1718411982709719040