Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?

Health data bear great promises for a healthier and happier life, but they also make us vulnerable. Making use of millions or billions of data points, Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are now creating new benefits. For sure, harvesting Big Data can have great potentials for the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Dirk Helbing, Thomas Beschorner, Bruno Frey, Andreas Diekmann, Thilo Hagendorff, Peter Seele, Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff, Jeroen van den Hoven, Andrej Zwitter
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:	triage trolley problem big data artificial intelligence technological selection eugenics ethics Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4ee58dd29f8b4da896f89b7514b9d699
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4ee58dd29f8b4da896f89b7514b9d699
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4ee58dd29f8b4da896f89b7514b9d6992021-11-26T11:19:49ZTriage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?2161-408310.1080/21614083.2021.1989243https://doaj.org/article/4ee58dd29f8b4da896f89b7514b9d6992021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1989243https://doaj.org/toc/2161-4083Health data bear great promises for a healthier and happier life, but they also make us vulnerable. Making use of millions or billions of data points, Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are now creating new benefits. For sure, harvesting Big Data can have great potentials for the health system, too. It can support accurate diagnoses, better treatments and greater cost effectiveness. However, it can also have undesirable implications, often in the sense of undesired side effects, which may in fact be terrible. Examples for this, as discussed in this article, are discrimination, the mechanisation of death, and genetic, social, behavioural or technological selection, which may imply eugenic effects or social Darwinism. As many unintended effects become visible only after years, we still lack sufficient criteria, long-term experience and advanced methods to reliably exclude that things may go terribly wrong. Handing over decision-making, responsibility or control to machines, could be dangerous and irresponsible. It would also be in serious conflict with human rights and our constitution.Dirk HelbingThomas BeschornerBruno FreyAndreas DiekmannThilo HagendorffPeter SeeleSarah Spiekermann-HoffJeroen van den HovenAndrej ZwitterTaylor & Francis Grouparticletriagetrolley problembig dataartificial intelligencetechnological selectioneugenicsethicsSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Medicine (General)R5-920ENJournal of European CME, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	triage trolley problem big data artificial intelligence technological selection eugenics ethics Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	triage trolley problem big data artificial intelligence technological selection eugenics ethics Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Medicine (General) R5-920 Dirk Helbing Thomas Beschorner Bruno Frey Andreas Diekmann Thilo Hagendorff Peter Seele Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff Jeroen van den Hoven Andrej Zwitter Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
description	Health data bear great promises for a healthier and happier life, but they also make us vulnerable. Making use of millions or billions of data points, Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are now creating new benefits. For sure, harvesting Big Data can have great potentials for the health system, too. It can support accurate diagnoses, better treatments and greater cost effectiveness. However, it can also have undesirable implications, often in the sense of undesired side effects, which may in fact be terrible. Examples for this, as discussed in this article, are discrimination, the mechanisation of death, and genetic, social, behavioural or technological selection, which may imply eugenic effects or social Darwinism. As many unintended effects become visible only after years, we still lack sufficient criteria, long-term experience and advanced methods to reliably exclude that things may go terribly wrong. Handing over decision-making, responsibility or control to machines, could be dangerous and irresponsible. It would also be in serious conflict with human rights and our constitution.
format	article
author	Dirk Helbing Thomas Beschorner Bruno Frey Andreas Diekmann Thilo Hagendorff Peter Seele Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff Jeroen van den Hoven Andrej Zwitter
author_facet	Dirk Helbing Thomas Beschorner Bruno Frey Andreas Diekmann Thilo Hagendorff Peter Seele Sarah Spiekermann-Hoff Jeroen van den Hoven Andrej Zwitter
author_sort	Dirk Helbing
title	Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_short	Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_full	Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_fullStr	Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_full_unstemmed	Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?
title_sort	triage 4.0: on death algorithms and technological selection. is today’s data- driven medical system still compatible with the constitution?
publisher	Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/4ee58dd29f8b4da896f89b7514b9d699
work_keys_str_mv	AT dirkhelbing triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution AT thomasbeschorner triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution AT brunofrey triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution AT andreasdiekmann triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution AT thilohagendorff triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution AT peterseele triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution AT sarahspiekermannhoff triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution AT jeroenvandenhoven triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution AT andrejzwitter triage40ondeathalgorithmsandtechnologicalselectionistodaysdatadrivenmedicalsystemstillcompatiblewiththeconstitution
_version_	1718409468240199680

Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?

Ejemplares similares