Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection

Abstract Hepatic pedicle clamping reduces intraoperative blood loss and the need for transfusion, but its long-term effect on survival and recurrence remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of the Pringle maneuver (PM) on long-term oncological outcomes in pati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elias Khajeh, Saeed Shafiei, Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh, Ali Ramouz, Ahmed Hammad, Omid Ghamarnejad, Mohammed Al-Saeedi, Nuh Rahbari, Christoph Reissfelder, Arianeb Mehrabi, Pascal Probst, Hani Oweira
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4f0727fe64d542f5bc3ac9a8a8b48fb5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4f0727fe64d542f5bc3ac9a8a8b48fb5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4f0727fe64d542f5bc3ac9a8a8b48fb52021-12-02T14:26:55ZMeta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection10.1038/s41598-021-82291-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/4f0727fe64d542f5bc3ac9a8a8b48fb52021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82291-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Hepatic pedicle clamping reduces intraoperative blood loss and the need for transfusion, but its long-term effect on survival and recurrence remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of the Pringle maneuver (PM) on long-term oncological outcomes in patients with primary or metastatic liver malignancies who underwent liver resection. Literature was searched in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline (via PubMed), and Web of Science databases. Survival was measured as the survival rate or as a continuous endpoint. Pooled estimates were represented as odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel–Haenszel test with a random-effects model. The literature search retrieved 435 studies. One RCT and 18 NRS, including 7480 patients who underwent liver resection with the PM (4309 cases) or without the PM (3171 cases) were included. The PM did not decrease the 1-year overall survival rate (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.67–1.09; P = 0.22) or the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates. The PM did not decrease the 1-year recurrence-free survival rate (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.75–1.50; P = 0.75) or the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates. There is no evidence that the Pringle maneuver has a negative effect on recurrence-free or overall survival rates.Elias KhajehSaeed ShafieiSadeq Ali-Hasan Al-SaeghAli RamouzAhmed HammadOmid GhamarnejadMohammed Al-SaeediNuh RahbariChristoph ReissfelderArianeb MehrabiPascal ProbstHani OweiraNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Elias Khajeh
Saeed Shafiei
Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh
Ali Ramouz
Ahmed Hammad
Omid Ghamarnejad
Mohammed Al-Saeedi
Nuh Rahbari
Christoph Reissfelder
Arianeb Mehrabi
Pascal Probst
Hani Oweira
Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection
description Abstract Hepatic pedicle clamping reduces intraoperative blood loss and the need for transfusion, but its long-term effect on survival and recurrence remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of the Pringle maneuver (PM) on long-term oncological outcomes in patients with primary or metastatic liver malignancies who underwent liver resection. Literature was searched in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline (via PubMed), and Web of Science databases. Survival was measured as the survival rate or as a continuous endpoint. Pooled estimates were represented as odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel–Haenszel test with a random-effects model. The literature search retrieved 435 studies. One RCT and 18 NRS, including 7480 patients who underwent liver resection with the PM (4309 cases) or without the PM (3171 cases) were included. The PM did not decrease the 1-year overall survival rate (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.67–1.09; P = 0.22) or the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates. The PM did not decrease the 1-year recurrence-free survival rate (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.75–1.50; P = 0.75) or the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates. There is no evidence that the Pringle maneuver has a negative effect on recurrence-free or overall survival rates.
format article
author Elias Khajeh
Saeed Shafiei
Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh
Ali Ramouz
Ahmed Hammad
Omid Ghamarnejad
Mohammed Al-Saeedi
Nuh Rahbari
Christoph Reissfelder
Arianeb Mehrabi
Pascal Probst
Hani Oweira
author_facet Elias Khajeh
Saeed Shafiei
Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh
Ali Ramouz
Ahmed Hammad
Omid Ghamarnejad
Mohammed Al-Saeedi
Nuh Rahbari
Christoph Reissfelder
Arianeb Mehrabi
Pascal Probst
Hani Oweira
author_sort Elias Khajeh
title Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection
title_short Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection
title_full Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection
title_sort meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4f0727fe64d542f5bc3ac9a8a8b48fb5
work_keys_str_mv AT eliaskhajeh metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT saeedshafiei metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT sadeqalihasanalsaegh metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT aliramouz metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT ahmedhammad metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT omidghamarnejad metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT mohammedalsaeedi metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT nuhrahbari metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT christophreissfelder metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT arianebmehrabi metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT pascalprobst metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
AT hanioweira metaanalysisoftheeffectofthepringlemaneuveronlongtermoncologicaloutcomesfollowingliverresection
_version_ 1718391308290097152