Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval

Abstract Under the International Council for Harmonization (ICH)‐E1 guideline for drugs intended for chronic or repeated intermittent use in non‐life‐threatening diseases, data from 100 patients exposed for a minimum of 1 year are required to be included in the safety data base of a new drug applica...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinobu Uzu, Shohko Sekine, Junichi Asano, Mutsuhiro Ikuma
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee583
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee583
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee5832021-11-19T17:51:35ZAssessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval1752-80621752-805410.1111/cts.13098https://doaj.org/article/4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee5832021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13098https://doaj.org/toc/1752-8054https://doaj.org/toc/1752-8062Abstract Under the International Council for Harmonization (ICH)‐E1 guideline for drugs intended for chronic or repeated intermittent use in non‐life‐threatening diseases, data from 100 patients exposed for a minimum of 1 year are required to be included in the safety data base of a new drug application. In response to the recent globalization of drug development, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan requires that the data according to the ICH‐E1 guideline should be collected from 100 Japanese patients by the administrative notice of Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials (reference cases) by considering ethnic differences in safety between Japanese and foreigners. In this study, we assessed Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) review reports of new drugs from 2016 to 2020 that include safety data for 100 Japanese patients exposed to these drugs for a minimum of 1 year to see if the study data led to the detection of Japanese‐specific safety issues. The result showed that the safety data from these patients provided only marginal value to identify Japanese‐specific safety issues, and no drugs were subjected to regulatory measures. Based on these studies and the fact that Japanese‐specific safety differences detected for a few drugs did not lead to adaptations of drug regulatory measures, we would like to propose not to make it a rule to collect safety data from 100 Japanese patients exposed at least 1 year, while keeping the ICH‐E1 guideline.Shinobu UzuShohko SekineJunichi AsanoMutsuhiro IkumaWileyarticleTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENClinical and Translational Science, Vol 14, Iss 6, Pp 2339-2347 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Shinobu Uzu
Shohko Sekine
Junichi Asano
Mutsuhiro Ikuma
Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval
description Abstract Under the International Council for Harmonization (ICH)‐E1 guideline for drugs intended for chronic or repeated intermittent use in non‐life‐threatening diseases, data from 100 patients exposed for a minimum of 1 year are required to be included in the safety data base of a new drug application. In response to the recent globalization of drug development, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan requires that the data according to the ICH‐E1 guideline should be collected from 100 Japanese patients by the administrative notice of Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials (reference cases) by considering ethnic differences in safety between Japanese and foreigners. In this study, we assessed Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) review reports of new drugs from 2016 to 2020 that include safety data for 100 Japanese patients exposed to these drugs for a minimum of 1 year to see if the study data led to the detection of Japanese‐specific safety issues. The result showed that the safety data from these patients provided only marginal value to identify Japanese‐specific safety issues, and no drugs were subjected to regulatory measures. Based on these studies and the fact that Japanese‐specific safety differences detected for a few drugs did not lead to adaptations of drug regulatory measures, we would like to propose not to make it a rule to collect safety data from 100 Japanese patients exposed at least 1 year, while keeping the ICH‐E1 guideline.
format article
author Shinobu Uzu
Shohko Sekine
Junichi Asano
Mutsuhiro Ikuma
author_facet Shinobu Uzu
Shohko Sekine
Junichi Asano
Mutsuhiro Ikuma
author_sort Shinobu Uzu
title Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval
title_short Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval
title_full Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval
title_fullStr Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval
title_sort assessment of the impact of japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee583
work_keys_str_mv AT shinobuuzu assessmentoftheimpactofjapanesespecificlongtermsafetydataonnewdrugapproval
AT shohkosekine assessmentoftheimpactofjapanesespecificlongtermsafetydataonnewdrugapproval
AT junichiasano assessmentoftheimpactofjapanesespecificlongtermsafetydataonnewdrugapproval
AT mutsuhiroikuma assessmentoftheimpactofjapanesespecificlongtermsafetydataonnewdrugapproval
_version_ 1718420011340529664