Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval
Abstract Under the International Council for Harmonization (ICH)‐E1 guideline for drugs intended for chronic or repeated intermittent use in non‐life‐threatening diseases, data from 100 patients exposed for a minimum of 1 year are required to be included in the safety data base of a new drug applica...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee583 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee583 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee5832021-11-19T17:51:35ZAssessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval1752-80621752-805410.1111/cts.13098https://doaj.org/article/4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee5832021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13098https://doaj.org/toc/1752-8054https://doaj.org/toc/1752-8062Abstract Under the International Council for Harmonization (ICH)‐E1 guideline for drugs intended for chronic or repeated intermittent use in non‐life‐threatening diseases, data from 100 patients exposed for a minimum of 1 year are required to be included in the safety data base of a new drug application. In response to the recent globalization of drug development, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan requires that the data according to the ICH‐E1 guideline should be collected from 100 Japanese patients by the administrative notice of Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials (reference cases) by considering ethnic differences in safety between Japanese and foreigners. In this study, we assessed Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) review reports of new drugs from 2016 to 2020 that include safety data for 100 Japanese patients exposed to these drugs for a minimum of 1 year to see if the study data led to the detection of Japanese‐specific safety issues. The result showed that the safety data from these patients provided only marginal value to identify Japanese‐specific safety issues, and no drugs were subjected to regulatory measures. Based on these studies and the fact that Japanese‐specific safety differences detected for a few drugs did not lead to adaptations of drug regulatory measures, we would like to propose not to make it a rule to collect safety data from 100 Japanese patients exposed at least 1 year, while keeping the ICH‐E1 guideline.Shinobu UzuShohko SekineJunichi AsanoMutsuhiro IkumaWileyarticleTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENClinical and Translational Science, Vol 14, Iss 6, Pp 2339-2347 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 |
spellingShingle |
Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Shinobu Uzu Shohko Sekine Junichi Asano Mutsuhiro Ikuma Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval |
description |
Abstract Under the International Council for Harmonization (ICH)‐E1 guideline for drugs intended for chronic or repeated intermittent use in non‐life‐threatening diseases, data from 100 patients exposed for a minimum of 1 year are required to be included in the safety data base of a new drug application. In response to the recent globalization of drug development, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan requires that the data according to the ICH‐E1 guideline should be collected from 100 Japanese patients by the administrative notice of Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials (reference cases) by considering ethnic differences in safety between Japanese and foreigners. In this study, we assessed Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) review reports of new drugs from 2016 to 2020 that include safety data for 100 Japanese patients exposed to these drugs for a minimum of 1 year to see if the study data led to the detection of Japanese‐specific safety issues. The result showed that the safety data from these patients provided only marginal value to identify Japanese‐specific safety issues, and no drugs were subjected to regulatory measures. Based on these studies and the fact that Japanese‐specific safety differences detected for a few drugs did not lead to adaptations of drug regulatory measures, we would like to propose not to make it a rule to collect safety data from 100 Japanese patients exposed at least 1 year, while keeping the ICH‐E1 guideline. |
format |
article |
author |
Shinobu Uzu Shohko Sekine Junichi Asano Mutsuhiro Ikuma |
author_facet |
Shinobu Uzu Shohko Sekine Junichi Asano Mutsuhiro Ikuma |
author_sort |
Shinobu Uzu |
title |
Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval |
title_short |
Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval |
title_full |
Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of the impact of Japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval |
title_sort |
assessment of the impact of japanese‐specific long‐term safety data on new drug approval |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/4f110dba9e164384af91d02ec52ee583 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shinobuuzu assessmentoftheimpactofjapanesespecificlongtermsafetydataonnewdrugapproval AT shohkosekine assessmentoftheimpactofjapanesespecificlongtermsafetydataonnewdrugapproval AT junichiasano assessmentoftheimpactofjapanesespecificlongtermsafetydataonnewdrugapproval AT mutsuhiroikuma assessmentoftheimpactofjapanesespecificlongtermsafetydataonnewdrugapproval |
_version_ |
1718420011340529664 |