Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery

There are still controversies around reconstructive surgeries used in POP treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the QoSL after VNTR vs. TVM surgery due to POP via the use of PISQ-12 and FSFI questionnaires. The study included a group of 121 sexually active patients qualified for reconstruc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Aleksandra Kamińska, Katarzyna Skorupska, Agnieszka Kubik-Komar, Konrad Futyma, Joanna Filipczak, Tomasz Rechberger
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	PISQ-12 FSFI pelvic organ prolapsed transvaginal mesh vaginal native tissue repair Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4f2327a508664e8a9eeca980881bd337
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4f2327a508664e8a9eeca980881bd337
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4f2327a508664e8a9eeca980881bd3372021-11-11T17:29:03ZQuality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery10.3390/jcm102148072077-0383https://doaj.org/article/4f2327a508664e8a9eeca980881bd3372021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/21/4807https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383There are still controversies around reconstructive surgeries used in POP treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the QoSL after VNTR vs. TVM surgery due to POP via the use of PISQ-12 and FSFI questionnaires. The study included a group of 121 sexually active patients qualified for reconstructive surgery due to symptomatic POP, and 50 control. The average results of PISQ-12 before and after surgery were compared using the <i>t</i>-test. The significance of the mean differences in demographic groups was measured using the <i>t</i>-test for independent samples and one-way ANOVA. The results in the demographic groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Fifty-eight women had VNTR, while 63 had TVM. Results of PISQ-12 revealed significant improvement in the sexual life after reconstructive surgery (27.24 vs. 32.43; <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>t</i> = 8.48) both after VNTR and TVM. There were no significant differences in the assessment of the QoSL according to PISQ-12 and FSFI results between both analyzed groups of patients (PISQ-12: VNTR vs. TVM; <i>t</i>-test <i>p</i> = 0.19 and FSFI: VNTR vs. TVM; Mann–Whitney U test <i>p</i> = 0.54). VNTR is the treatment of choice in the case of uncomplicated primary POP.Aleksandra KamińskaKatarzyna SkorupskaAgnieszka Kubik-KomarKonrad FutymaJoanna FilipczakTomasz RechbergerMDPI AGarticlePISQ-12FSFIpelvic organ prolapsedtransvaginal meshvaginal native tissue repairMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 4807, p 4807 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	PISQ-12 FSFI pelvic organ prolapsed transvaginal mesh vaginal native tissue repair Medicine R
spellingShingle	PISQ-12 FSFI pelvic organ prolapsed transvaginal mesh vaginal native tissue repair Medicine R Aleksandra Kamińska Katarzyna Skorupska Agnieszka Kubik-Komar Konrad Futyma Joanna Filipczak Tomasz Rechberger Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery
description	There are still controversies around reconstructive surgeries used in POP treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the QoSL after VNTR vs. TVM surgery due to POP via the use of PISQ-12 and FSFI questionnaires. The study included a group of 121 sexually active patients qualified for reconstructive surgery due to symptomatic POP, and 50 control. The average results of PISQ-12 before and after surgery were compared using the <i>t</i>-test. The significance of the mean differences in demographic groups was measured using the <i>t</i>-test for independent samples and one-way ANOVA. The results in the demographic groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Fifty-eight women had VNTR, while 63 had TVM. Results of PISQ-12 revealed significant improvement in the sexual life after reconstructive surgery (27.24 vs. 32.43; <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>t</i> = 8.48) both after VNTR and TVM. There were no significant differences in the assessment of the QoSL according to PISQ-12 and FSFI results between both analyzed groups of patients (PISQ-12: VNTR vs. TVM; <i>t</i>-test <i>p</i> = 0.19 and FSFI: VNTR vs. TVM; Mann–Whitney U test <i>p</i> = 0.54). VNTR is the treatment of choice in the case of uncomplicated primary POP.
format	article
author	Aleksandra Kamińska Katarzyna Skorupska Agnieszka Kubik-Komar Konrad Futyma Joanna Filipczak Tomasz Rechberger
author_facet	Aleksandra Kamińska Katarzyna Skorupska Agnieszka Kubik-Komar Konrad Futyma Joanna Filipczak Tomasz Rechberger
author_sort	Aleksandra Kamińska
title	Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery
title_short	Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery
title_full	Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery
title_fullStr	Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery
title_full_unstemmed	Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery
title_sort	quality of sexual life after native tissue versus polypropylene mesh augmented pelvic floor reconstructive surgery
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/4f2327a508664e8a9eeca980881bd337
work_keys_str_mv	AT aleksandrakaminska qualityofsexuallifeafternativetissueversuspolypropylenemeshaugmentedpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery AT katarzynaskorupska qualityofsexuallifeafternativetissueversuspolypropylenemeshaugmentedpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery AT agnieszkakubikkomar qualityofsexuallifeafternativetissueversuspolypropylenemeshaugmentedpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery AT konradfutyma qualityofsexuallifeafternativetissueversuspolypropylenemeshaugmentedpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery AT joannafilipczak qualityofsexuallifeafternativetissueversuspolypropylenemeshaugmentedpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery AT tomaszrechberger qualityofsexuallifeafternativetissueversuspolypropylenemeshaugmentedpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgery
_version_	1718432062070849536

Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery

Ejemplares similares