Comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.

Recently, there has been a renewed interest in low-field MRI. Contrast agents (CA) in MRI have magnetic behavior dependent on magnetic field strength. Therefore, the optimal contrast agent for low-field MRI might be different from what is used at higher fields. Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron-oxi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jordy K van Zandwijk, Frank F J Simonis, Friso G Heslinga, Elfi I S Hofmeijer, Robert H Geelkerken, Bennie Ten Haken
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4f3402e4a57044098b77329ac482f9cd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4f3402e4a57044098b77329ac482f9cd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4f3402e4a57044098b77329ac482f9cd2021-12-02T20:17:55ZComparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256252https://doaj.org/article/4f3402e4a57044098b77329ac482f9cd2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256252https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Recently, there has been a renewed interest in low-field MRI. Contrast agents (CA) in MRI have magnetic behavior dependent on magnetic field strength. Therefore, the optimal contrast agent for low-field MRI might be different from what is used at higher fields. Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron-oxides (USPIOs), commonly used as negative CA, might also be used for generating positive contrast in low-field MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an USPIO or a gadolinium based contrast agent is more appropriate at low field strengths. Relaxivity values of ferumoxytol (USPIO) and gadoterate (gadolinium based) were used in this research to simulate normalized signal intensity (SI) curves within a concentration range of 0-15 mM. Simulations were experimentally validated on a 0.25T MRI scanner. Simulations and experiments were performed using spin echo (SE), spoiled gradient echo (SGE), and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequences. Maximum achievable SIs were assessed for both CAs in a range of concentrations on all sequences. Simulations at 0.25T showed a peak in SIs at low concentrations ferumoxytol versus a wide top at higher concentrations for gadoterate in SE and SGE. Experiments agreed well with the simulations in SE and SGE, but less in the bSSFP sequence due to overestimated relaxivities in simulations. At low magnetic field strengths, ferumoxytol generates similar signal enhancement at lower concentrations than gadoterate.Jordy K van ZandwijkFrank F J SimonisFriso G HeslingaElfi I S HofmeijerRobert H GeelkerkenBennie Ten HakenPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0256252 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jordy K van Zandwijk
Frank F J Simonis
Friso G Heslinga
Elfi I S Hofmeijer
Robert H Geelkerken
Bennie Ten Haken
Comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.
description Recently, there has been a renewed interest in low-field MRI. Contrast agents (CA) in MRI have magnetic behavior dependent on magnetic field strength. Therefore, the optimal contrast agent for low-field MRI might be different from what is used at higher fields. Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron-oxides (USPIOs), commonly used as negative CA, might also be used for generating positive contrast in low-field MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an USPIO or a gadolinium based contrast agent is more appropriate at low field strengths. Relaxivity values of ferumoxytol (USPIO) and gadoterate (gadolinium based) were used in this research to simulate normalized signal intensity (SI) curves within a concentration range of 0-15 mM. Simulations were experimentally validated on a 0.25T MRI scanner. Simulations and experiments were performed using spin echo (SE), spoiled gradient echo (SGE), and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequences. Maximum achievable SIs were assessed for both CAs in a range of concentrations on all sequences. Simulations at 0.25T showed a peak in SIs at low concentrations ferumoxytol versus a wide top at higher concentrations for gadoterate in SE and SGE. Experiments agreed well with the simulations in SE and SGE, but less in the bSSFP sequence due to overestimated relaxivities in simulations. At low magnetic field strengths, ferumoxytol generates similar signal enhancement at lower concentrations than gadoterate.
format article
author Jordy K van Zandwijk
Frank F J Simonis
Friso G Heslinga
Elfi I S Hofmeijer
Robert H Geelkerken
Bennie Ten Haken
author_facet Jordy K van Zandwijk
Frank F J Simonis
Friso G Heslinga
Elfi I S Hofmeijer
Robert H Geelkerken
Bennie Ten Haken
author_sort Jordy K van Zandwijk
title Comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.
title_short Comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.
title_full Comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.
title_fullStr Comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.
title_sort comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field mri.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4f3402e4a57044098b77329ac482f9cd
work_keys_str_mv AT jordykvanzandwijk comparingthesignalenhancementofagadoliniumbasedandanironoxidebasedcontrastagentinlowfieldmri
AT frankfjsimonis comparingthesignalenhancementofagadoliniumbasedandanironoxidebasedcontrastagentinlowfieldmri
AT frisogheslinga comparingthesignalenhancementofagadoliniumbasedandanironoxidebasedcontrastagentinlowfieldmri
AT elfiishofmeijer comparingthesignalenhancementofagadoliniumbasedandanironoxidebasedcontrastagentinlowfieldmri
AT roberthgeelkerken comparingthesignalenhancementofagadoliniumbasedandanironoxidebasedcontrastagentinlowfieldmri
AT bennietenhaken comparingthesignalenhancementofagadoliniumbasedandanironoxidebasedcontrastagentinlowfieldmri
_version_ 1718374342589415424