Design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study
Abstract Background Pilot studies are essential in determining if a larger study is feasible. This is especially true when targeting populations that experience stigma and may be difficult to include in research, such as people with HIV. We sought to describe how pilot studies have been used to info...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4f3742647e244e7291bf3caeb40843dd |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4f3742647e244e7291bf3caeb40843dd |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4f3742647e244e7291bf3caeb40843dd2021-12-05T12:08:30ZDesign, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study10.1186/s40814-021-00934-92055-5784https://doaj.org/article/4f3742647e244e7291bf3caeb40843dd2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00934-9https://doaj.org/toc/2055-5784Abstract Background Pilot studies are essential in determining if a larger study is feasible. This is especially true when targeting populations that experience stigma and may be difficult to include in research, such as people with HIV. We sought to describe how pilot studies have been used to inform HIV clinical trials. Methods We conducted a methodological study of pilot studies of interventions in people living with HIV published until November 25, 2020, using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL). We extracted data on their nomenclature, primary objective, use of progression criteria, sample size, use of qualitative methods, and other contextual information (region, income, level, type of intervention, study design). Results Our search retrieved 10,597 studies, of which 248 were eligible. The number of pilot studies increased steadily over time. We found that 179 studies (72.2%) used the terms “pilot” or “feasibility” in their title, 65.3% tested feasibility as a primary objective, only 2% used progression criteria, 23.9% provided a sample size estimation and only 30.2% used qualitative methods. Conclusions Pilot studies are increasingly being used to inform HIV research. However, the titles and objectives are not always consistent with piloting. The design and reporting of pilot studies in HIV could be improved.Hussein Ali El-KhechenMohammed Inam Ullah KhanSelvin LeenusOluwatobi OlaiyaZoha DurraniZaryan MasoodAlvin LeenusShakib AkhterLawrence MbuagbawBMCarticlePilot studyFeasibility studyFeasibility outcomeProgression criteriaKey populationHIVMedicine (General)R5-920ENPilot and Feasibility Studies, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Pilot study Feasibility study Feasibility outcome Progression criteria Key population HIV Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
Pilot study Feasibility study Feasibility outcome Progression criteria Key population HIV Medicine (General) R5-920 Hussein Ali El-Khechen Mohammed Inam Ullah Khan Selvin Leenus Oluwatobi Olaiya Zoha Durrani Zaryan Masood Alvin Leenus Shakib Akhter Lawrence Mbuagbaw Design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study |
description |
Abstract Background Pilot studies are essential in determining if a larger study is feasible. This is especially true when targeting populations that experience stigma and may be difficult to include in research, such as people with HIV. We sought to describe how pilot studies have been used to inform HIV clinical trials. Methods We conducted a methodological study of pilot studies of interventions in people living with HIV published until November 25, 2020, using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL). We extracted data on their nomenclature, primary objective, use of progression criteria, sample size, use of qualitative methods, and other contextual information (region, income, level, type of intervention, study design). Results Our search retrieved 10,597 studies, of which 248 were eligible. The number of pilot studies increased steadily over time. We found that 179 studies (72.2%) used the terms “pilot” or “feasibility” in their title, 65.3% tested feasibility as a primary objective, only 2% used progression criteria, 23.9% provided a sample size estimation and only 30.2% used qualitative methods. Conclusions Pilot studies are increasingly being used to inform HIV research. However, the titles and objectives are not always consistent with piloting. The design and reporting of pilot studies in HIV could be improved. |
format |
article |
author |
Hussein Ali El-Khechen Mohammed Inam Ullah Khan Selvin Leenus Oluwatobi Olaiya Zoha Durrani Zaryan Masood Alvin Leenus Shakib Akhter Lawrence Mbuagbaw |
author_facet |
Hussein Ali El-Khechen Mohammed Inam Ullah Khan Selvin Leenus Oluwatobi Olaiya Zoha Durrani Zaryan Masood Alvin Leenus Shakib Akhter Lawrence Mbuagbaw |
author_sort |
Hussein Ali El-Khechen |
title |
Design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study |
title_short |
Design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study |
title_full |
Design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study |
title_fullStr |
Design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study |
title_sort |
design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in hiv: a systematic review and methodological study |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/4f3742647e244e7291bf3caeb40843dd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT husseinalielkhechen designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy AT mohammedinamullahkhan designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy AT selvinleenus designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy AT oluwatobiolaiya designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy AT zohadurrani designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy AT zaryanmasood designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy AT alvinleenus designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy AT shakibakhter designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy AT lawrencembuagbaw designanalysisandreportingofpilotstudiesinhivasystematicreviewandmethodologicalstudy |
_version_ |
1718372190463721472 |