Consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study

<h4>Background</h4> Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), also named minimally invasive autopsy is a post-mortem method shown to be an acceptable proxy of the complete diagnostic autopsy. MITS improves the knowledge of causes of death (CoD) in resource-limited settings. Its implemen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khátia Munguambe, Maria Maixenchs, Rui Anselmo, John Blevins, Jaume Ordi, Inácio Mandomando, Robert F. Breiman, Quique Bassat, Clara Menéndez
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4f4ca08c943b45b5840bd151a2622f83
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4f4ca08c943b45b5840bd151a2622f83
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4f4ca08c943b45b5840bd151a2622f832021-11-18T06:22:35ZConsent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/4f4ca08c943b45b5840bd151a2622f832021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575303/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4> Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), also named minimally invasive autopsy is a post-mortem method shown to be an acceptable proxy of the complete diagnostic autopsy. MITS improves the knowledge of causes of death (CoD) in resource-limited settings. Its implementation requires understanding the components of acceptability, including facilitators and barriers in real-case scenarios. <h4>Methods</h4> We undertook a mixed-methods analysis comparing anticipated (hypothetical scenario) and experienced (real-case scenario) acceptability of MITS among relatives of deceased children in Mozambique. Anticipated acceptability information was obtained from 15 interviews with relatives of deceased children. The interview focus was on whether and why they would allow the procedure on their dead child in a hypothetical scenario. Experienced acceptability data were obtained from outcomes of consent requested to relatives of 114 deceased children during MITS implementation, recorded through observations, clinical records abstraction and follow-up informal conversations with health care professionals and semi-structured interviews with relatives. <h4>Results</h4> Ninety-three percent of relatives indicated that they would hypothetically accept MITS on their deceased child. A key reason was knowing the CoD to take preventive actions; whereas the need to conform with the norm of immediate child burial, the secrecy of perinatal deaths, the decision-making complexity, the misalignment between MITS’ purpose and traditional values, lack of a credible reason to investigate CoD, and the impotency to resuscitate the deceased were identified as potential points of hesitancy for acceptance. The only refusing respondent linked MITS to a perception that sharing results would constitute a breach of confidentiality and the lack of value attached to CoD determination. Experienced acceptability revealed four different components: actual acceptance, health professionals’ hesitancy, relatives’ hesitancy and actual refusal, which resulted in 82% of approached relatives to agree with MITS and 79% of cases to undergo MITS. Barriers to acceptability included, among others, health professionals’ and facilities’ unpreparedness to perform MITS, the threat of not burying the child immediately, financial burden of delays, decision-making complexities and misalignment of MITS’ objectives with family values. <h4>Conclusions</h4> MITS showed high anticipated and experienced acceptability driven by the opportunity to prevent further deaths. Anticipated acceptability identified secrecy, confidentiality and complex decision-making processes as barriers, while experienced acceptability revealed family- and health facility-level logistics and practical aspects as barriers. Health-system and logistical impediments must also be considered before MITS implementation. Additionally, the multiple components of acceptability must be taken into account to make it more consistent and transferrable.Khátia MunguambeMaria MaixenchsRui AnselmoJohn BlevinsJaume OrdiInácio MandomandoRobert F. BreimanQuique BassatClara MenéndezPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Khátia Munguambe
Maria Maixenchs
Rui Anselmo
John Blevins
Jaume Ordi
Inácio Mandomando
Robert F. Breiman
Quique Bassat
Clara Menéndez
Consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study
description <h4>Background</h4> Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), also named minimally invasive autopsy is a post-mortem method shown to be an acceptable proxy of the complete diagnostic autopsy. MITS improves the knowledge of causes of death (CoD) in resource-limited settings. Its implementation requires understanding the components of acceptability, including facilitators and barriers in real-case scenarios. <h4>Methods</h4> We undertook a mixed-methods analysis comparing anticipated (hypothetical scenario) and experienced (real-case scenario) acceptability of MITS among relatives of deceased children in Mozambique. Anticipated acceptability information was obtained from 15 interviews with relatives of deceased children. The interview focus was on whether and why they would allow the procedure on their dead child in a hypothetical scenario. Experienced acceptability data were obtained from outcomes of consent requested to relatives of 114 deceased children during MITS implementation, recorded through observations, clinical records abstraction and follow-up informal conversations with health care professionals and semi-structured interviews with relatives. <h4>Results</h4> Ninety-three percent of relatives indicated that they would hypothetically accept MITS on their deceased child. A key reason was knowing the CoD to take preventive actions; whereas the need to conform with the norm of immediate child burial, the secrecy of perinatal deaths, the decision-making complexity, the misalignment between MITS’ purpose and traditional values, lack of a credible reason to investigate CoD, and the impotency to resuscitate the deceased were identified as potential points of hesitancy for acceptance. The only refusing respondent linked MITS to a perception that sharing results would constitute a breach of confidentiality and the lack of value attached to CoD determination. Experienced acceptability revealed four different components: actual acceptance, health professionals’ hesitancy, relatives’ hesitancy and actual refusal, which resulted in 82% of approached relatives to agree with MITS and 79% of cases to undergo MITS. Barriers to acceptability included, among others, health professionals’ and facilities’ unpreparedness to perform MITS, the threat of not burying the child immediately, financial burden of delays, decision-making complexities and misalignment of MITS’ objectives with family values. <h4>Conclusions</h4> MITS showed high anticipated and experienced acceptability driven by the opportunity to prevent further deaths. Anticipated acceptability identified secrecy, confidentiality and complex decision-making processes as barriers, while experienced acceptability revealed family- and health facility-level logistics and practical aspects as barriers. Health-system and logistical impediments must also be considered before MITS implementation. Additionally, the multiple components of acceptability must be taken into account to make it more consistent and transferrable.
format article
author Khátia Munguambe
Maria Maixenchs
Rui Anselmo
John Blevins
Jaume Ordi
Inácio Mandomando
Robert F. Breiman
Quique Bassat
Clara Menéndez
author_facet Khátia Munguambe
Maria Maixenchs
Rui Anselmo
John Blevins
Jaume Ordi
Inácio Mandomando
Robert F. Breiman
Quique Bassat
Clara Menéndez
author_sort Khátia Munguambe
title Consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study
title_short Consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study
title_full Consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study
title_sort consent to minimally invasive tissue sampling procedures in children in mozambique: a mixed-methods study
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4f4ca08c943b45b5840bd151a2622f83
work_keys_str_mv AT khatiamunguambe consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
AT mariamaixenchs consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
AT ruianselmo consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
AT johnblevins consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
AT jaumeordi consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
AT inaciomandomando consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
AT robertfbreiman consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
AT quiquebassat consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
AT claramenendez consenttominimallyinvasivetissuesamplingproceduresinchildreninmozambiqueamixedmethodsstudy
_version_ 1718424477586423808