Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bony Trajectory Screw and Traditional Trajectory Screw in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review

Background Data: Pedicle screw is the main method for lumbar spine fixation. Pedicle screw fixation allows correction of spinal deformities and avoids nonunion. Cortical bony trajectory screw (CBTS) is a new procedure in which screw follows an inferior to superior pathway in the sagittal plane and a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamed F Khattab, MD., Mostafa A Kamal, MD., Naser H Zaher, MD.
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Egyptian Spine Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4f65ba53ab134f6e93b5485d12f2778b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4f65ba53ab134f6e93b5485d12f2778b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4f65ba53ab134f6e93b5485d12f2778b2021-12-02T10:19:57ZComparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bony Trajectory Screw and Traditional Trajectory Screw in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review10.21608/esj.2020.23678.11242314-89502314-8969https://doaj.org/article/4f65ba53ab134f6e93b5485d12f2778b2020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_85042_d76fd9038f3c238678b180bd6c4b3c79.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969Background Data: Pedicle screw is the main method for lumbar spine fixation. Pedicle screw fixation allows correction of spinal deformities and avoids nonunion. Cortical bony trajectory screw (CBTS) is a new procedure in which screw follows an inferior to superior pathway in the sagittal plane and a medial to lateral pathway in the transverse plane. CBTS reduces the operative and postoperative complications and has high fixation strength. Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between CBTS and traditional trajectory screw (TTS) in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Study Design: Systematic review of literature. Materials and Methods: Comprehensive electronic search in PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate for articles that were published between 2009 and 2019 using the following keywords: cortical bony trajectory screw, cortical bony trajectory-pedicle screw, pedicle screw, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Results: Eleven articles met our inclusion criteria and were reported. The majority of the published data prove that the CBTS approach has a similar postoperative leg and back pain when compared to TTS although some of them reported less leg and back pain as regards CBTS. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the operative time showed no significant differences between the CBTS and TTS. Radiological outcomes were similar in both procedures regarding fusion rates and vertebral slippage reduction. Blood loss during surgery was significantly less with CBTS compared to TTS. Conclusion: Both Oswestry Disability Index and operative time showed insignificant differences between the CBTS and TTS. Blood loss was significantly less with CBTS compared to TTS. Radiological outcomes were similar in both procedures. CBTS is a reasonable alternative technique to TTS in short segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion although the current literature did not prove its superiority. Mohamed F Khattab, MD.Mostafa A Kamal, MD.Naser H Zaher, MD.Egyptian Spine Associationarticlecortical bony trajectory screwconventional screw trajectoryNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENEgyptian Spine Journal, Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 26-35 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cortical bony trajectory screw
conventional screw trajectory
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle cortical bony trajectory screw
conventional screw trajectory
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Mohamed F Khattab, MD.
Mostafa A Kamal, MD.
Naser H Zaher, MD.
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bony Trajectory Screw and Traditional Trajectory Screw in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
description Background Data: Pedicle screw is the main method for lumbar spine fixation. Pedicle screw fixation allows correction of spinal deformities and avoids nonunion. Cortical bony trajectory screw (CBTS) is a new procedure in which screw follows an inferior to superior pathway in the sagittal plane and a medial to lateral pathway in the transverse plane. CBTS reduces the operative and postoperative complications and has high fixation strength. Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between CBTS and traditional trajectory screw (TTS) in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Study Design: Systematic review of literature. Materials and Methods: Comprehensive electronic search in PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate for articles that were published between 2009 and 2019 using the following keywords: cortical bony trajectory screw, cortical bony trajectory-pedicle screw, pedicle screw, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Results: Eleven articles met our inclusion criteria and were reported. The majority of the published data prove that the CBTS approach has a similar postoperative leg and back pain when compared to TTS although some of them reported less leg and back pain as regards CBTS. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the operative time showed no significant differences between the CBTS and TTS. Radiological outcomes were similar in both procedures regarding fusion rates and vertebral slippage reduction. Blood loss during surgery was significantly less with CBTS compared to TTS. Conclusion: Both Oswestry Disability Index and operative time showed insignificant differences between the CBTS and TTS. Blood loss was significantly less with CBTS compared to TTS. Radiological outcomes were similar in both procedures. CBTS is a reasonable alternative technique to TTS in short segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion although the current literature did not prove its superiority.
format article
author Mohamed F Khattab, MD.
Mostafa A Kamal, MD.
Naser H Zaher, MD.
author_facet Mohamed F Khattab, MD.
Mostafa A Kamal, MD.
Naser H Zaher, MD.
author_sort Mohamed F Khattab, MD.
title Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bony Trajectory Screw and Traditional Trajectory Screw in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
title_short Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bony Trajectory Screw and Traditional Trajectory Screw in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
title_full Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bony Trajectory Screw and Traditional Trajectory Screw in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bony Trajectory Screw and Traditional Trajectory Screw in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bony Trajectory Screw and Traditional Trajectory Screw in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
title_sort comparison of surgical outcomes between cortical bony trajectory screw and traditional trajectory screw in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review
publisher Egyptian Spine Association
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/4f65ba53ab134f6e93b5485d12f2778b
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedfkhattabmd comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweencorticalbonytrajectoryscrewandtraditionaltrajectoryscrewinposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionasystematicreview
AT mostafaakamalmd comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweencorticalbonytrajectoryscrewandtraditionaltrajectoryscrewinposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionasystematicreview
AT naserhzahermd comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweencorticalbonytrajectoryscrewandtraditionaltrajectoryscrewinposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionasystematicreview
_version_ 1718397405243637760