Critical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions?
Abstract The curricular content in medical education needs continuous development and therefore must regularly undergo a critical evaluation. Here, the author describes an implemented shift in the teaching substance of an undergraduate dermatology course aimed to focus on relevance and practicabilit...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4f67542941b347fdb51b06df55fe1996 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4f67542941b347fdb51b06df55fe1996 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4f67542941b347fdb51b06df55fe19962021-12-02T11:13:09ZCritical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions?2690-442X10.1002/ski2.67https://doaj.org/article/4f67542941b347fdb51b06df55fe19962021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.67https://doaj.org/toc/2690-442XAbstract The curricular content in medical education needs continuous development and therefore must regularly undergo a critical evaluation. Here, the author describes an implemented shift in the teaching substance of an undergraduate dermatology course aimed to focus on relevance and practicability for general practitioners. The changes were based on a comprehensive nationwide database analysis of the spectrum of skin‐related conditions seen in primary care.A. SalavaWileyarticleDermatologyRL1-803ENSkin Health and Disease, Vol 1, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Dermatology RL1-803 |
| spellingShingle |
Dermatology RL1-803 A. Salava Critical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions? |
| description |
Abstract The curricular content in medical education needs continuous development and therefore must regularly undergo a critical evaluation. Here, the author describes an implemented shift in the teaching substance of an undergraduate dermatology course aimed to focus on relevance and practicability for general practitioners. The changes were based on a comprehensive nationwide database analysis of the spectrum of skin‐related conditions seen in primary care. |
| format |
article |
| author |
A. Salava |
| author_facet |
A. Salava |
| author_sort |
A. Salava |
| title |
Critical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions? |
| title_short |
Critical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions? |
| title_full |
Critical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions? |
| title_fullStr |
Critical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Critical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions? |
| title_sort |
critical evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum—are we asking the right questions? |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/4f67542941b347fdb51b06df55fe1996 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT asalava criticalevaluationoftheundergraduatecurriculumareweaskingtherightquestions |
| _version_ |
1718396108742328320 |