Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.

The ability to transmit information between individuals through social learning is a foundational component of cultural evolution. However, how this transmission occurs is still debated. On the one hand, the copying account draws parallels with biological mechanisms for genetic inheritance, arguing...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James W A Strachan, Arianna Curioni, Merryn D Constable, Günther Knoblich, Mathieu Charbonneau
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e2021-12-02T20:14:36ZEvaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256901https://doaj.org/article/4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256901https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The ability to transmit information between individuals through social learning is a foundational component of cultural evolution. However, how this transmission occurs is still debated. On the one hand, the copying account draws parallels with biological mechanisms for genetic inheritance, arguing that learners copy what they observe and novel variations occur through random copying errors. On the other hand, the reconstruction account claims that, rather than directly copying behaviour, learners reconstruct the information that they believe to be most relevant on the basis of pragmatic inference, environmental and contextual cues. Distinguishing these two accounts empirically is difficult based on data from typical transmission chain studies because the predictions they generate frequently overlap. In this study we present a methodological approach that generates different predictions of these accounts by manipulating the task context between model and learner in a transmission episode. We then report an empirical proof-of-concept that applies this approach. The results show that, when a model introduces context-dependent embedded signals to their actions that are not intended to be transmitted, it is possible to empirically distinguish between competing predictions made by these two accounts. Our approach can therefore serve to understand the underlying cognitive mechanisms at play in cultural transmission and can make important contributions to the debate between preservative and reconstructive schools of thought.James W A StrachanArianna CurioniMerryn D ConstableGünther KnoblichMathieu CharbonneauPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0256901 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
James W A Strachan
Arianna Curioni
Merryn D Constable
Günther Knoblich
Mathieu Charbonneau
Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.
description The ability to transmit information between individuals through social learning is a foundational component of cultural evolution. However, how this transmission occurs is still debated. On the one hand, the copying account draws parallels with biological mechanisms for genetic inheritance, arguing that learners copy what they observe and novel variations occur through random copying errors. On the other hand, the reconstruction account claims that, rather than directly copying behaviour, learners reconstruct the information that they believe to be most relevant on the basis of pragmatic inference, environmental and contextual cues. Distinguishing these two accounts empirically is difficult based on data from typical transmission chain studies because the predictions they generate frequently overlap. In this study we present a methodological approach that generates different predictions of these accounts by manipulating the task context between model and learner in a transmission episode. We then report an empirical proof-of-concept that applies this approach. The results show that, when a model introduces context-dependent embedded signals to their actions that are not intended to be transmitted, it is possible to empirically distinguish between competing predictions made by these two accounts. Our approach can therefore serve to understand the underlying cognitive mechanisms at play in cultural transmission and can make important contributions to the debate between preservative and reconstructive schools of thought.
format article
author James W A Strachan
Arianna Curioni
Merryn D Constable
Günther Knoblich
Mathieu Charbonneau
author_facet James W A Strachan
Arianna Curioni
Merryn D Constable
Günther Knoblich
Mathieu Charbonneau
author_sort James W A Strachan
title Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.
title_short Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.
title_full Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.
title_fullStr Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.
title_sort evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e
work_keys_str_mv AT jameswastrachan evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes
AT ariannacurioni evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes
AT merryndconstable evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes
AT guntherknoblich evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes
AT mathieucharbonneau evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes
_version_ 1718374643311575040