Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.
The ability to transmit information between individuals through social learning is a foundational component of cultural evolution. However, how this transmission occurs is still debated. On the one hand, the copying account draws parallels with biological mechanisms for genetic inheritance, arguing...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e2021-12-02T20:14:36ZEvaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256901https://doaj.org/article/4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256901https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The ability to transmit information between individuals through social learning is a foundational component of cultural evolution. However, how this transmission occurs is still debated. On the one hand, the copying account draws parallels with biological mechanisms for genetic inheritance, arguing that learners copy what they observe and novel variations occur through random copying errors. On the other hand, the reconstruction account claims that, rather than directly copying behaviour, learners reconstruct the information that they believe to be most relevant on the basis of pragmatic inference, environmental and contextual cues. Distinguishing these two accounts empirically is difficult based on data from typical transmission chain studies because the predictions they generate frequently overlap. In this study we present a methodological approach that generates different predictions of these accounts by manipulating the task context between model and learner in a transmission episode. We then report an empirical proof-of-concept that applies this approach. The results show that, when a model introduces context-dependent embedded signals to their actions that are not intended to be transmitted, it is possible to empirically distinguish between competing predictions made by these two accounts. Our approach can therefore serve to understand the underlying cognitive mechanisms at play in cultural transmission and can make important contributions to the debate between preservative and reconstructive schools of thought.James W A StrachanArianna CurioniMerryn D ConstableGünther KnoblichMathieu CharbonneauPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0256901 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q James W A Strachan Arianna Curioni Merryn D Constable Günther Knoblich Mathieu Charbonneau Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes. |
description |
The ability to transmit information between individuals through social learning is a foundational component of cultural evolution. However, how this transmission occurs is still debated. On the one hand, the copying account draws parallels with biological mechanisms for genetic inheritance, arguing that learners copy what they observe and novel variations occur through random copying errors. On the other hand, the reconstruction account claims that, rather than directly copying behaviour, learners reconstruct the information that they believe to be most relevant on the basis of pragmatic inference, environmental and contextual cues. Distinguishing these two accounts empirically is difficult based on data from typical transmission chain studies because the predictions they generate frequently overlap. In this study we present a methodological approach that generates different predictions of these accounts by manipulating the task context between model and learner in a transmission episode. We then report an empirical proof-of-concept that applies this approach. The results show that, when a model introduces context-dependent embedded signals to their actions that are not intended to be transmitted, it is possible to empirically distinguish between competing predictions made by these two accounts. Our approach can therefore serve to understand the underlying cognitive mechanisms at play in cultural transmission and can make important contributions to the debate between preservative and reconstructive schools of thought. |
format |
article |
author |
James W A Strachan Arianna Curioni Merryn D Constable Günther Knoblich Mathieu Charbonneau |
author_facet |
James W A Strachan Arianna Curioni Merryn D Constable Günther Knoblich Mathieu Charbonneau |
author_sort |
James W A Strachan |
title |
Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes. |
title_short |
Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes. |
title_full |
Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes. |
title_sort |
evaluating the relative contributions of copying and reconstruction processes in cultural transmission episodes. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/4f73a9250af94215b5271faf711aa56e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jameswastrachan evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes AT ariannacurioni evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes AT merryndconstable evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes AT guntherknoblich evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes AT mathieucharbonneau evaluatingtherelativecontributionsofcopyingandreconstructionprocessesinculturaltransmissionepisodes |
_version_ |
1718374643311575040 |