General practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge

General practitioners (GPs) often find that linear, deductive knowledge does not provide a sufficient map for clinical management. But experience, accompanied by enduring familiarity with individual patients, may offer unique complementary skills to interpret a patient’s symptoms and navigate skilfu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirsti Malterud, Harald Kamps
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4feba1a4dcf44f5eac4f81453c3be720
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4feba1a4dcf44f5eac4f81453c3be720
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4feba1a4dcf44f5eac4f81453c3be7202021-11-17T14:21:55ZGeneral practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge0281-34321502-772410.1080/02813432.2021.2004831https://doaj.org/article/4feba1a4dcf44f5eac4f81453c3be7202021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.2004831https://doaj.org/toc/0281-3432https://doaj.org/toc/1502-7724General practitioners (GPs) often find that linear, deductive knowledge does not provide a sufficient map for clinical management. But experience, accompanied by enduring familiarity with individual patients, may offer unique complementary skills to interpret a patient’s symptoms and navigate skilfully through diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and prevention. In this article, we draw attention to the nature of this tacit knowing that is executed by many GPs every day. We argue that the nonlinear, unpredictable complexity of this domain nurtures a particular logic of clinical knowing. This kind of knowledge is not intuition and can to some extent be intersubjectively accessible. We substantiate and discuss how and why general practice research can contribute to knowledge development by transforming reflection-in-action to reflection-on-action. We briefly present some concepts for reflection-on-action of clinical knowing in general practice. The VUCA model (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity) embraces dynamic and confusing situations in which agile work (adaptive, flexible and responsive behaviour and cognitive creativity) is assumed to be an appropriate response. Using such perspectives, we may sharpen our gaze and apply reflexivity and analytic elaboration to interpret unique incidents and experiences and appreciate the complexity of general practice. In this way, exploratory research can fertilize general practice and offer innovation to the entire domain of clinical knowledge.Kirsti MalterudHarald KampsTaylor & Francis Grouparticle(mesh): general practiceknowledgeclinical decision-makingdiagnosistherapeuticsuncertaintyPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol 0, Iss 0, Pp 1-4 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic (mesh): general practice
knowledge
clinical decision-making
diagnosis
therapeutics
uncertainty
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle (mesh): general practice
knowledge
clinical decision-making
diagnosis
therapeutics
uncertainty
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Kirsti Malterud
Harald Kamps
General practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge
description General practitioners (GPs) often find that linear, deductive knowledge does not provide a sufficient map for clinical management. But experience, accompanied by enduring familiarity with individual patients, may offer unique complementary skills to interpret a patient’s symptoms and navigate skilfully through diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and prevention. In this article, we draw attention to the nature of this tacit knowing that is executed by many GPs every day. We argue that the nonlinear, unpredictable complexity of this domain nurtures a particular logic of clinical knowing. This kind of knowledge is not intuition and can to some extent be intersubjectively accessible. We substantiate and discuss how and why general practice research can contribute to knowledge development by transforming reflection-in-action to reflection-on-action. We briefly present some concepts for reflection-on-action of clinical knowing in general practice. The VUCA model (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity) embraces dynamic and confusing situations in which agile work (adaptive, flexible and responsive behaviour and cognitive creativity) is assumed to be an appropriate response. Using such perspectives, we may sharpen our gaze and apply reflexivity and analytic elaboration to interpret unique incidents and experiences and appreciate the complexity of general practice. In this way, exploratory research can fertilize general practice and offer innovation to the entire domain of clinical knowledge.
format article
author Kirsti Malterud
Harald Kamps
author_facet Kirsti Malterud
Harald Kamps
author_sort Kirsti Malterud
title General practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge
title_short General practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge
title_full General practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge
title_fullStr General practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge
title_full_unstemmed General practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge
title_sort general practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4feba1a4dcf44f5eac4f81453c3be720
work_keys_str_mv AT kirstimalterud generalpracticeafertilelagoonintheoceanofmedicalknowledge
AT haraldkamps generalpracticeafertilelagoonintheoceanofmedicalknowledge
_version_ 1718425479823753216