COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare patient’s response rate with and without mechanical bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration of Study: This study was carried out at the Department of OBGYN DHQ Teac...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Wajida Tayyab, Humaira Hafeez, Shahla Manzoor, Asma Hameed, Zainab Saifuddin
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2019
Materias:	vaginal prolapse mechanical bowel preparation Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4feeffbde4d04cc4876e55cbd4a8e678
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4feeffbde4d04cc4876e55cbd4a8e678
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4feeffbde4d04cc4876e55cbd4a8e6782021-11-16T04:54:21ZCOMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL0030-96482411-8842https://doaj.org/article/4feeffbde4d04cc4876e55cbd4a8e6782019-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/2512/2067https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective: The objective of this study was to compare patient’s response rate with and without mechanical bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration of Study: This study was carried out at the Department of OBGYN DHQ Teaching Hospital Rawalpindi from 7th Jan 2017 to 7th Jul 2017. Material and Methods: After approval from hospital ethical committee, a total of 60 patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were taken. They were randomly divided into 2 equal groups using lottery method. In group-A the patients had Mechanical bowel preparation and in group-B patients had their regular diet before vaginal prolapse surgery (hysterectomy, anterior or posterior repair) and were just kept NPO from midnight. Results: Total 60 patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Mean age (years) in the study was 52.78 ± 4.87. Patient response in terms of good response (absence of nausea, vomiting and anal irritation) with bowel preparation was 19 (63.3%) and without bowel preparation was 16 (53.3%). The patient response in terms of average response (having one symptom) with bowel preparation was 9 (30%) and without mechanical bowel prepration was 14 (46.7%). Only 2 patients (both in group A) had poor response (presence of 2 or more symptoms). This was statistically not significant (p-value 0.188). Conclusion: The study concluded that there was no difference in response with and without mechanical bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery so there is no need of subjecting patients to bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery.Wajida TayyabHumaira HafeezShahla ManzoorAsma HameedZainab SaifuddinArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticlevaginal prolapsemechanical bowel preparationMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 69, Iss 1, Pp 142-146 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	vaginal prolapse mechanical bowel preparation Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	vaginal prolapse mechanical bowel preparation Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 Wajida Tayyab Humaira Hafeez Shahla Manzoor Asma Hameed Zainab Saifuddin COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
description	Objective: The objective of this study was to compare patient’s response rate with and without mechanical bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration of Study: This study was carried out at the Department of OBGYN DHQ Teaching Hospital Rawalpindi from 7th Jan 2017 to 7th Jul 2017. Material and Methods: After approval from hospital ethical committee, a total of 60 patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were taken. They were randomly divided into 2 equal groups using lottery method. In group-A the patients had Mechanical bowel preparation and in group-B patients had their regular diet before vaginal prolapse surgery (hysterectomy, anterior or posterior repair) and were just kept NPO from midnight. Results: Total 60 patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Mean age (years) in the study was 52.78 ± 4.87. Patient response in terms of good response (absence of nausea, vomiting and anal irritation) with bowel preparation was 19 (63.3%) and without bowel preparation was 16 (53.3%). The patient response in terms of average response (having one symptom) with bowel preparation was 9 (30%) and without mechanical bowel prepration was 14 (46.7%). Only 2 patients (both in group A) had poor response (presence of 2 or more symptoms). This was statistically not significant (p-value 0.188). Conclusion: The study concluded that there was no difference in response with and without mechanical bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery so there is no need of subjecting patients to bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery.
format	article
author	Wajida Tayyab Humaira Hafeez Shahla Manzoor Asma Hameed Zainab Saifuddin
author_facet	Wajida Tayyab Humaira Hafeez Shahla Manzoor Asma Hameed Zainab Saifuddin
author_sort	Wajida Tayyab
title	COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_short	COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_full	COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_fullStr	COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_full_unstemmed	COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_sort	comparison of mechanical bowel preparation versus regular diet before vaginal prolapse surgery: a randomized controlled trial
publisher	Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/4feeffbde4d04cc4876e55cbd4a8e678
work_keys_str_mv	AT wajidatayyab comparisonofmechanicalbowelpreparationversusregulardietbeforevaginalprolapsesurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT humairahafeez comparisonofmechanicalbowelpreparationversusregulardietbeforevaginalprolapsesurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shahlamanzoor comparisonofmechanicalbowelpreparationversusregulardietbeforevaginalprolapsesurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT asmahameed comparisonofmechanicalbowelpreparationversusregulardietbeforevaginalprolapsesurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zainabsaifuddin comparisonofmechanicalbowelpreparationversusregulardietbeforevaginalprolapsesurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_	1718426722352758784

COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS REGULAR DIET BEFORE VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Ejemplares similares