The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development

The participation of citizens in scientific research has a long tradition, and in some disciplines, especially medical research, it is even common practice. In Technology Assessment (TA), Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), and Sustainable Development (SD), the participation of citizens can b...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nora Weinberger, Silvia Woll, Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba, Nona Schulte-Römer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4ff2eb2c03f6414c864f6338a0f725dc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4ff2eb2c03f6414c864f6338a0f725dc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4ff2eb2c03f6414c864f6338a0f725dc2021-11-11T19:22:18ZThe Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development10.3390/su1321116132071-1050https://doaj.org/article/4ff2eb2c03f6414c864f6338a0f725dc2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11613https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050The participation of citizens in scientific research has a long tradition, and in some disciplines, especially medical research, it is even common practice. In Technology Assessment (TA), Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), and Sustainable Development (SD), the participation of citizens can be of considerable value. In this paper, we explore this value for three concepts, based on the researcher’s insights from three participatory research projects. The first project is the citizen science project TeQfor1, which was conducted with, for, and on the type 1 diabetes community, who do not feel adequately supported by the conventional health care system. In the second project, citizens with vision impairments participated in the technological development of an audio-tactile navigation tool in the TERRAIN project. The third project (Nachtlichter) dealt with light pollution. Based on the three projects presented, we show that citizen participation makes specific contributions to TA, RRI, and SD. We also investigate the specificity of citizen engagement and motivation by differentiating between existing and emerging involvement. In conclusion, we discuss the benefits that may be added by participatory approaches for the three concepts of TA, RRI, and SD.Nora WeinbergerSilvia WollChristopher Conrad Maximillian KybaNona Schulte-RömerMDPI AGarticletransdisciplinary researchcitizen participationcitizen sciencetechnology assessmentresponsible research and innovationsustainable developmentEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 11613, p 11613 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic transdisciplinary research
citizen participation
citizen science
technology assessment
responsible research and innovation
sustainable development
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle transdisciplinary research
citizen participation
citizen science
technology assessment
responsible research and innovation
sustainable development
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Nora Weinberger
Silvia Woll
Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba
Nona Schulte-Römer
The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development
description The participation of citizens in scientific research has a long tradition, and in some disciplines, especially medical research, it is even common practice. In Technology Assessment (TA), Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), and Sustainable Development (SD), the participation of citizens can be of considerable value. In this paper, we explore this value for three concepts, based on the researcher’s insights from three participatory research projects. The first project is the citizen science project TeQfor1, which was conducted with, for, and on the type 1 diabetes community, who do not feel adequately supported by the conventional health care system. In the second project, citizens with vision impairments participated in the technological development of an audio-tactile navigation tool in the TERRAIN project. The third project (Nachtlichter) dealt with light pollution. Based on the three projects presented, we show that citizen participation makes specific contributions to TA, RRI, and SD. We also investigate the specificity of citizen engagement and motivation by differentiating between existing and emerging involvement. In conclusion, we discuss the benefits that may be added by participatory approaches for the three concepts of TA, RRI, and SD.
format article
author Nora Weinberger
Silvia Woll
Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba
Nona Schulte-Römer
author_facet Nora Weinberger
Silvia Woll
Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba
Nona Schulte-Römer
author_sort Nora Weinberger
title The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development
title_short The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development
title_full The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development
title_fullStr The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development
title_sort value of citizen participation in technology assessment, responsible research and innovation, and sustainable development
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4ff2eb2c03f6414c864f6338a0f725dc
work_keys_str_mv AT noraweinberger thevalueofcitizenparticipationintechnologyassessmentresponsibleresearchandinnovationandsustainabledevelopment
AT silviawoll thevalueofcitizenparticipationintechnologyassessmentresponsibleresearchandinnovationandsustainabledevelopment
AT christopherconradmaximilliankyba thevalueofcitizenparticipationintechnologyassessmentresponsibleresearchandinnovationandsustainabledevelopment
AT nonaschulteromer thevalueofcitizenparticipationintechnologyassessmentresponsibleresearchandinnovationandsustainabledevelopment
AT noraweinberger valueofcitizenparticipationintechnologyassessmentresponsibleresearchandinnovationandsustainabledevelopment
AT silviawoll valueofcitizenparticipationintechnologyassessmentresponsibleresearchandinnovationandsustainabledevelopment
AT christopherconradmaximilliankyba valueofcitizenparticipationintechnologyassessmentresponsibleresearchandinnovationandsustainabledevelopment
AT nonaschulteromer valueofcitizenparticipationintechnologyassessmentresponsibleresearchandinnovationandsustainabledevelopment
_version_ 1718431527883243520