Establishing, or Failing? That Is the (Puzzling) Question. An Attempt to Introduce a Complementary Currency

<span class="abs_content">In 2015–16 in Valle d'Aosta – a small autonomous region in northwestern Italy – some local politicians entered into dialogue with each other and the population on the suitability of a complementary currency in the regional territory. Despite the willing...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joselle Dagnes, Luca Storti
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Coordinamento SIBA 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/50222fd4dda54003a9d35551adc26578
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:50222fd4dda54003a9d35551adc26578
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:50222fd4dda54003a9d35551adc265782021-11-21T15:11:41ZEstablishing, or Failing? That Is the (Puzzling) Question. An Attempt to Introduce a Complementary Currency1972-76232035-660910.1285/i20356609v13i1p540https://doaj.org/article/50222fd4dda54003a9d35551adc265782020-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/22000https://doaj.org/toc/1972-7623https://doaj.org/toc/2035-6609<span class="abs_content">In 2015–16 in Valle d'Aosta – a small autonomous region in northwestern Italy – some local politicians entered into dialogue with each other and the population on the suitability of a complementary currency in the regional territory. Despite the willingness of the promoters, the complementary currency was not launched in the end, partly for contingent reasons (regarding, inter alia, the definition of new political priorities and alliances), partly because of issues that were structural in nature: i.e. lack of structural embeddedness hindering collective action, inter-group ties and personal trust; and a low degree of institutional trust and of institutional transparency. Taking this case into account, this article aims to deepen understanding of the socio-institutional conditions that may favor or, on the contrary, hinder monetary innovation in a local context. Specifically, we highlight the lack of compactness of the proposal – concerning objectives, timing and territorial scale of implementation – and the emergence of a logic of competition with other political and entrepreneurial actors of the territory as the main weaknesses of the project. Furthermore, we show that a balance between the public and private spheres, leading to a heterophile and polycentric network, is needed in order to facilitate the implementation of a complementary currency.</span><br />Joselle DagnesLuca StortiCoordinamento SIBAarticlecomplementary currencymoney creationlocal developmentsocial innovationlocal governmentsPolitical science (General)JA1-92ENPartecipazione e Conflitto, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 540-563 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic complementary currency
money creation
local development
social innovation
local governments
Political science (General)
JA1-92
spellingShingle complementary currency
money creation
local development
social innovation
local governments
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Joselle Dagnes
Luca Storti
Establishing, or Failing? That Is the (Puzzling) Question. An Attempt to Introduce a Complementary Currency
description <span class="abs_content">In 2015–16 in Valle d'Aosta – a small autonomous region in northwestern Italy – some local politicians entered into dialogue with each other and the population on the suitability of a complementary currency in the regional territory. Despite the willingness of the promoters, the complementary currency was not launched in the end, partly for contingent reasons (regarding, inter alia, the definition of new political priorities and alliances), partly because of issues that were structural in nature: i.e. lack of structural embeddedness hindering collective action, inter-group ties and personal trust; and a low degree of institutional trust and of institutional transparency. Taking this case into account, this article aims to deepen understanding of the socio-institutional conditions that may favor or, on the contrary, hinder monetary innovation in a local context. Specifically, we highlight the lack of compactness of the proposal – concerning objectives, timing and territorial scale of implementation – and the emergence of a logic of competition with other political and entrepreneurial actors of the territory as the main weaknesses of the project. Furthermore, we show that a balance between the public and private spheres, leading to a heterophile and polycentric network, is needed in order to facilitate the implementation of a complementary currency.</span><br />
format article
author Joselle Dagnes
Luca Storti
author_facet Joselle Dagnes
Luca Storti
author_sort Joselle Dagnes
title Establishing, or Failing? That Is the (Puzzling) Question. An Attempt to Introduce a Complementary Currency
title_short Establishing, or Failing? That Is the (Puzzling) Question. An Attempt to Introduce a Complementary Currency
title_full Establishing, or Failing? That Is the (Puzzling) Question. An Attempt to Introduce a Complementary Currency
title_fullStr Establishing, or Failing? That Is the (Puzzling) Question. An Attempt to Introduce a Complementary Currency
title_full_unstemmed Establishing, or Failing? That Is the (Puzzling) Question. An Attempt to Introduce a Complementary Currency
title_sort establishing, or failing? that is the (puzzling) question. an attempt to introduce a complementary currency
publisher Coordinamento SIBA
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/50222fd4dda54003a9d35551adc26578
work_keys_str_mv AT joselledagnes establishingorfailingthatisthepuzzlingquestionanattempttointroduceacomplementarycurrency
AT lucastorti establishingorfailingthatisthepuzzlingquestionanattempttointroduceacomplementarycurrency
_version_ 1718418762456104960