Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation

Armed conflicts pose significant problems for ensuring that regional conservation plans are implemented. Here, Hammill et al. show that offsetting the impacts of protected area loss through protection of additional areas during conflicts provides the greatest return on investment for conservation pr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	E. Hammill, A. I. T. Tulloch, H. P. Possingham, N. Strange, K. A. Wilson
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2016
Materias:	Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5027bdac6c5048e39854da0d8c6f2b71
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5027bdac6c5048e39854da0d8c6f2b71
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5027bdac6c5048e39854da0d8c6f2b712021-12-02T15:35:01ZFactoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation10.1038/ncomms110422041-1723https://doaj.org/article/5027bdac6c5048e39854da0d8c6f2b712016-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11042https://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723Armed conflicts pose significant problems for ensuring that regional conservation plans are implemented. Here, Hammill et al. show that offsetting the impacts of protected area loss through protection of additional areas during conflicts provides the greatest return on investment for conservation programs.E. HammillA. I. T. TullochH. P. PossinghamN. StrangeK. A. WilsonNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Science Q
spellingShingle	Science Q E. Hammill A. I. T. Tulloch H. P. Possingham N. Strange K. A. Wilson Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation
description	Armed conflicts pose significant problems for ensuring that regional conservation plans are implemented. Here, Hammill et al. show that offsetting the impacts of protected area loss through protection of additional areas during conflicts provides the greatest return on investment for conservation programs.
format	article
author	E. Hammill A. I. T. Tulloch H. P. Possingham N. Strange K. A. Wilson
author_facet	E. Hammill A. I. T. Tulloch H. P. Possingham N. Strange K. A. Wilson
author_sort	E. Hammill
title	Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation
title_short	Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation
title_full	Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation
title_fullStr	Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation
title_full_unstemmed	Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation
title_sort	factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/5027bdac6c5048e39854da0d8c6f2b71
work_keys_str_mv	AT ehammill factoringattitudestowardsarmedconflictriskintoselectionofprotectedareasforconservation AT aittulloch factoringattitudestowardsarmedconflictriskintoselectionofprotectedareasforconservation AT hppossingham factoringattitudestowardsarmedconflictriskintoselectionofprotectedareasforconservation AT nstrange factoringattitudestowardsarmedconflictriskintoselectionofprotectedareasforconservation AT kawilson factoringattitudestowardsarmedconflictriskintoselectionofprotectedareasforconservation
_version_	1718386654341758976

Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation

Ejemplares similares