Evaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation
Introduction. The implementation of priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation involves an assessment of the trends in the development of human, scientific, technological and innovation potential within the framework of these directions. In modern conditions...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | RU |
Publicado: |
National Research Mordova State University
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/50331db01c9049b2bb5a3139f704a3ae |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:50331db01c9049b2bb5a3139f704a3ae |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
RU |
topic |
priorities of scientific and technological development personnel potential publication activity patent activity technology innovation potential labor intensity Education L |
spellingShingle |
priorities of scientific and technological development personnel potential publication activity patent activity technology innovation potential labor intensity Education L Magomed Sh. Mintsaev Irina E. Ilina Svetlana L. Parfenova Vladislava N. Dolgova Elena N. Zharova Elizaveta V. Agamirova Evaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation |
description |
Introduction. The implementation of priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation involves an assessment of the trends in the development of human, scientific, technological and innovation potential within the framework of these directions. In modern conditions of transformation of science and technology into key factors of Russian development, it is necessary to provide the country’s economy with human resources capable of withstanding “big challenges”, but at this stage there is a shortage of highly qualified specialists in many key industries that can offer a new scientific result, taking into account the prospects for its application. The purpose of the article is to develop an approach to assess the human, scientific, technological and innovative potentials in the context of priorities in the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation and its validation using the example of three priorities.
Materials and Methods. The materials of this study draw on Rosstat and FSMNO ; Rospatent; Web of Science and Scopus. The object of research is to assess human, scientific, technological and innovative potential in the context of priorities in scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. In the course of the research, a multiplicative model of the impact of the availability of human, scientific, technological and innovative capacity on labour intensity was developed. In the process of research, the following research and analysis methods were used: comparison, induction and deduction method, generalisation method, chain substitution method, logical structure study, system analysis, and special methods of statistical, comparative analysis. In the methodological plan, we used the system and process appro aches in the basis of the study.
Results. The study revealed that the labour intensity in 2016 for all three priorities of the scientific and technological revolution of the Russian Federation has increased. Therefore, according to the priorities of the scientific and technological revolution of the Russian Federation, the availability of scientific, technological and innovative potential is not sufficient, which leads to a decrease in the reverse indicator of labour intensity - labour productivity in the markets within the framework of these priorities. Concerning the impact on labour intensity in all three priorities, one observes: the growth of “collaborations” in fundamental research, the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, “collaborations” of applied research; reduction in citations from scientific articles, low patent activity of engineering and technical workers, technological demand for patents. Therefore, against the background of emerging collaborative activity of actors in the process of research and development and the growth of the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, there is a low level of orientation of scientific and scientific-technical results to c ommercialisation.
Discussion and Conclusions. On the basis of the multiplicative model developed by the authors for assessing the impact of the provision of human, scientific, technological and innovative capacities on labor intensity, it was tested on the example of the three priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation (a, b, c). It was revealed that the labour intensity in 2016, according to the priorities of the Scientific and Technical Council of the Russian Federation, increased, and the availability of scientific, technological and innovative potential is not sufficient, which leads to a decrease in the inverse measure of labour intensity - labour productivity in high-tech markets within the framework of these priorities. Concerning the impact on labour intensity for all three priorities, it was revealed: the growth of “collaborations” of fundamental research, the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, “collaborations” of applied research; reduction in citations from scientific articles, low patent activity of engineering and technical workers, technological demand for patents. It was also revealed that against the background of the emerging collaborative activity of actors in the process of research and development and the growth of the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, there is a low level of orientation of scientific and scientific-technical results to commercialisation. |
format |
article |
author |
Magomed Sh. Mintsaev Irina E. Ilina Svetlana L. Parfenova Vladislava N. Dolgova Elena N. Zharova Elizaveta V. Agamirova |
author_facet |
Magomed Sh. Mintsaev Irina E. Ilina Svetlana L. Parfenova Vladislava N. Dolgova Elena N. Zharova Elizaveta V. Agamirova |
author_sort |
Magomed Sh. Mintsaev |
title |
Evaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation |
title_short |
Evaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation |
title_full |
Evaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation |
title_sort |
evaluation of availability of human, scientific, technological and innovative potential in the context of priorities in scientific and technological development of the russian federation |
publisher |
National Research Mordova State University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/50331db01c9049b2bb5a3139f704a3ae |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT magomedshmintsaev evaluationofavailabilityofhumanscientifictechnologicalandinnovativepotentialinthecontextofprioritiesinscientificandtechnologicaldevelopmentoftherussianfederation AT irinaeilina evaluationofavailabilityofhumanscientifictechnologicalandinnovativepotentialinthecontextofprioritiesinscientificandtechnologicaldevelopmentoftherussianfederation AT svetlanalparfenova evaluationofavailabilityofhumanscientifictechnologicalandinnovativepotentialinthecontextofprioritiesinscientificandtechnologicaldevelopmentoftherussianfederation AT vladislavandolgova evaluationofavailabilityofhumanscientifictechnologicalandinnovativepotentialinthecontextofprioritiesinscientificandtechnologicaldevelopmentoftherussianfederation AT elenanzharova evaluationofavailabilityofhumanscientifictechnologicalandinnovativepotentialinthecontextofprioritiesinscientificandtechnologicaldevelopmentoftherussianfederation AT elizavetavagamirova evaluationofavailabilityofhumanscientifictechnologicalandinnovativepotentialinthecontextofprioritiesinscientificandtechnologicaldevelopmentoftherussianfederation |
_version_ |
1718399630150991872 |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:50331db01c9049b2bb5a3139f704a3ae2021-12-02T07:02:50ZEvaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation 10.15507/1991-9468.092.022.201803.460-4791991-94682308-1058https://doaj.org/article/50331db01c9049b2bb5a3139f704a3ae2018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://edumag.mrsu.ru/index.php/en/articles-en/81-18-3/670-10-15507-1991-9468-092-022-201803-4https://doaj.org/toc/1991-9468https://doaj.org/toc/2308-1058Introduction. The implementation of priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation involves an assessment of the trends in the development of human, scientific, technological and innovation potential within the framework of these directions. In modern conditions of transformation of science and technology into key factors of Russian development, it is necessary to provide the country’s economy with human resources capable of withstanding “big challenges”, but at this stage there is a shortage of highly qualified specialists in many key industries that can offer a new scientific result, taking into account the prospects for its application. The purpose of the article is to develop an approach to assess the human, scientific, technological and innovative potentials in the context of priorities in the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation and its validation using the example of three priorities. Materials and Methods. The materials of this study draw on Rosstat and FSMNO ; Rospatent; Web of Science and Scopus. The object of research is to assess human, scientific, technological and innovative potential in the context of priorities in scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. In the course of the research, a multiplicative model of the impact of the availability of human, scientific, technological and innovative capacity on labour intensity was developed. In the process of research, the following research and analysis methods were used: comparison, induction and deduction method, generalisation method, chain substitution method, logical structure study, system analysis, and special methods of statistical, comparative analysis. In the methodological plan, we used the system and process appro aches in the basis of the study. Results. The study revealed that the labour intensity in 2016 for all three priorities of the scientific and technological revolution of the Russian Federation has increased. Therefore, according to the priorities of the scientific and technological revolution of the Russian Federation, the availability of scientific, technological and innovative potential is not sufficient, which leads to a decrease in the reverse indicator of labour intensity - labour productivity in the markets within the framework of these priorities. Concerning the impact on labour intensity in all three priorities, one observes: the growth of “collaborations” in fundamental research, the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, “collaborations” of applied research; reduction in citations from scientific articles, low patent activity of engineering and technical workers, technological demand for patents. Therefore, against the background of emerging collaborative activity of actors in the process of research and development and the growth of the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, there is a low level of orientation of scientific and scientific-technical results to c ommercialisation. Discussion and Conclusions. On the basis of the multiplicative model developed by the authors for assessing the impact of the provision of human, scientific, technological and innovative capacities on labor intensity, it was tested on the example of the three priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation (a, b, c). It was revealed that the labour intensity in 2016, according to the priorities of the Scientific and Technical Council of the Russian Federation, increased, and the availability of scientific, technological and innovative potential is not sufficient, which leads to a decrease in the inverse measure of labour intensity - labour productivity in high-tech markets within the framework of these priorities. Concerning the impact on labour intensity for all three priorities, it was revealed: the growth of “collaborations” of fundamental research, the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, “collaborations” of applied research; reduction in citations from scientific articles, low patent activity of engineering and technical workers, technological demand for patents. It was also revealed that against the background of the emerging collaborative activity of actors in the process of research and development and the growth of the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, there is a low level of orientation of scientific and scientific-technical results to commercialisation.Magomed Sh. MintsaevIrina E. IlinaSvetlana L. ParfenovaVladislava N. DolgovaElena N. ZharovaElizaveta V. AgamirovaNational Research Mordova State Universityarticlepriorities of scientific and technological developmentpersonnel potentialpublication activitypatent activitytechnologyinnovation potentiallabor intensityEducationLRUИнтеграция образования, Vol 22, Iss 3, Pp 460-479 (2018) |