Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes

An in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is required for the development of improved combination immunotherapies for gastric cancer. Recently, we classified these cancers into four main types defined by their immunological attributes, namely Hot 1, Hot 2, Intermediate and Cold....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noriyuki Saito, Yukari Kobayashi, Koji Nagaoka, Yoshihiro Kushihara, Yasuyoshi Sato, Ikuo Wada, Kazuhiro Kakimi, Yasuyuki Seto
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5083fbf3126d4e1a8af51c48ba6dc19f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5083fbf3126d4e1a8af51c48ba6dc19f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5083fbf3126d4e1a8af51c48ba6dc19f2021-11-04T04:33:18ZTwo distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes2405-580810.1016/j.bbrep.2021.101167https://doaj.org/article/5083fbf3126d4e1a8af51c48ba6dc19f2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405580821002612https://doaj.org/toc/2405-5808An in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is required for the development of improved combination immunotherapies for gastric cancer. Recently, we classified these cancers into four main types defined by their immunological attributes, namely Hot 1, Hot 2, Intermediate and Cold. Of these, the T cell-inflamed “Hot” tumors were further divided into Hot 1 and Hot 2 with different clinical outcomes. Thus, overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with Hot 1 tumors were shorter than with Hot 2. In the present study, we re-evaluated RNA-Seq data of 6 Hot 1 and 6 Hot 2 gastric cancers to elucidate the underlying reason for the poor prognosis and T cell dysfunction in the former. In addition, 56 Hot 1 and 27 Hot 2 tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. We report that single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) and differential gene expression analysis identified differences between Hot 1 and Hot 2 tumors involved in metabolism and cell adhesion pathways. Therefore, it is suggested that strategies to modulate active metabolism in Hot 1 tumors should be integrated into the treatment of these gastric cancers.Noriyuki SaitoYukari KobayashiKoji NagaokaYoshihiro KushiharaYasuyoshi SatoIkuo WadaKazuhiro KakimiYasuyuki SetoElsevierarticleGastric cancerTumor immunityRNA-SeqT cell-inflamedHot tumorBiology (General)QH301-705.5BiochemistryQD415-436ENBiochemistry and Biophysics Reports, Vol 28, Iss , Pp 101167- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Gastric cancer
Tumor immunity
RNA-Seq
T cell-inflamed
Hot tumor
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Biochemistry
QD415-436
spellingShingle Gastric cancer
Tumor immunity
RNA-Seq
T cell-inflamed
Hot tumor
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Biochemistry
QD415-436
Noriyuki Saito
Yukari Kobayashi
Koji Nagaoka
Yoshihiro Kushihara
Yasuyoshi Sato
Ikuo Wada
Kazuhiro Kakimi
Yasuyuki Seto
Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
description An in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is required for the development of improved combination immunotherapies for gastric cancer. Recently, we classified these cancers into four main types defined by their immunological attributes, namely Hot 1, Hot 2, Intermediate and Cold. Of these, the T cell-inflamed “Hot” tumors were further divided into Hot 1 and Hot 2 with different clinical outcomes. Thus, overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with Hot 1 tumors were shorter than with Hot 2. In the present study, we re-evaluated RNA-Seq data of 6 Hot 1 and 6 Hot 2 gastric cancers to elucidate the underlying reason for the poor prognosis and T cell dysfunction in the former. In addition, 56 Hot 1 and 27 Hot 2 tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. We report that single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) and differential gene expression analysis identified differences between Hot 1 and Hot 2 tumors involved in metabolism and cell adhesion pathways. Therefore, it is suggested that strategies to modulate active metabolism in Hot 1 tumors should be integrated into the treatment of these gastric cancers.
format article
author Noriyuki Saito
Yukari Kobayashi
Koji Nagaoka
Yoshihiro Kushihara
Yasuyoshi Sato
Ikuo Wada
Kazuhiro Kakimi
Yasuyuki Seto
author_facet Noriyuki Saito
Yukari Kobayashi
Koji Nagaoka
Yoshihiro Kushihara
Yasuyoshi Sato
Ikuo Wada
Kazuhiro Kakimi
Yasuyuki Seto
author_sort Noriyuki Saito
title Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_short Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_full Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_fullStr Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_full_unstemmed Two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
title_sort two distinct phenotypes of immunologically hot gastric cancer subtypes
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5083fbf3126d4e1a8af51c48ba6dc19f
work_keys_str_mv AT noriyukisaito twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT yukarikobayashi twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT kojinagaoka twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT yoshihirokushihara twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT yasuyoshisato twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT ikuowada twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT kazuhirokakimi twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
AT yasuyukiseto twodistinctphenotypesofimmunologicallyhotgastriccancersubtypes
_version_ 1718445271883448320