Hierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.

<h4>Background</h4>Occupational studies often involve multiple comparisons and therefore suffer from false positive findings. Semi-Bayes adjustment methods have sometimes been used to address this issue. Hierarchical regression is a more general approach, including Semi-Bayes adjustment...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marine Corbin, Lorenzo Richiardi, Roel Vermeulen, Hans Kromhout, Franco Merletti, Susan Peters, Lorenzo Simonato, Kyle Steenland, Neil Pearce, Milena Maule
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5088ee611e7f48d6aaa7d383b1ef5556
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5088ee611e7f48d6aaa7d383b1ef5556
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5088ee611e7f48d6aaa7d383b1ef55562021-11-18T07:15:48ZHierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0038944https://doaj.org/article/5088ee611e7f48d6aaa7d383b1ef55562012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22701732/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Occupational studies often involve multiple comparisons and therefore suffer from false positive findings. Semi-Bayes adjustment methods have sometimes been used to address this issue. Hierarchical regression is a more general approach, including Semi-Bayes adjustment as a special case, that aims at improving the validity of standard maximum-likelihood estimates in the presence of multiple comparisons by incorporating similarities between the exposures of interest in a second-stage model.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We re-analysed data from an occupational case-control study of lung cancer, applying hierarchical regression. In the second-stage model, we included the exposure to three known lung carcinogens (asbestos, chromium and silica) for each occupation, under the assumption that occupations entailing similar carcinogenic exposures are associated with similar risks of lung cancer. Hierarchical regression estimates had smaller confidence intervals than maximum-likelihood estimates. The shrinkage toward the null was stronger for extreme, less stable estimates (e.g., "specialised farmers": maximum-likelihood OR: 3.44, 95%CI 0.90-13.17; hierarchical regression OR: 1.53, 95%CI 0.63-3.68). Unlike Semi-Bayes adjustment toward the global mean, hierarchical regression did not shrink all the ORs towards the null (e.g., "Metal smelting, converting and refining furnacemen": maximum-likelihood OR: 1.07, Semi-Bayes OR: 1.06, hierarchical regression OR: 1.26).<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Hierarchical regression could be a valuable tool in occupational studies in which disease risk is estimated for a large amount of occupations when we have information available on the key carcinogenic exposures involved in each occupation. With the constant progress in exposure assessment methods in occupational settings and the availability of Job Exposure Matrices, it should become easier to apply this approach.Marine CorbinLorenzo RichiardiRoel VermeulenHans KromhoutFranco MerlettiSusan PetersLorenzo SimonatoKyle SteenlandNeil PearceMilena MaulePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 6, p e38944 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Marine Corbin
Lorenzo Richiardi
Roel Vermeulen
Hans Kromhout
Franco Merletti
Susan Peters
Lorenzo Simonato
Kyle Steenland
Neil Pearce
Milena Maule
Hierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.
description <h4>Background</h4>Occupational studies often involve multiple comparisons and therefore suffer from false positive findings. Semi-Bayes adjustment methods have sometimes been used to address this issue. Hierarchical regression is a more general approach, including Semi-Bayes adjustment as a special case, that aims at improving the validity of standard maximum-likelihood estimates in the presence of multiple comparisons by incorporating similarities between the exposures of interest in a second-stage model.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We re-analysed data from an occupational case-control study of lung cancer, applying hierarchical regression. In the second-stage model, we included the exposure to three known lung carcinogens (asbestos, chromium and silica) for each occupation, under the assumption that occupations entailing similar carcinogenic exposures are associated with similar risks of lung cancer. Hierarchical regression estimates had smaller confidence intervals than maximum-likelihood estimates. The shrinkage toward the null was stronger for extreme, less stable estimates (e.g., "specialised farmers": maximum-likelihood OR: 3.44, 95%CI 0.90-13.17; hierarchical regression OR: 1.53, 95%CI 0.63-3.68). Unlike Semi-Bayes adjustment toward the global mean, hierarchical regression did not shrink all the ORs towards the null (e.g., "Metal smelting, converting and refining furnacemen": maximum-likelihood OR: 1.07, Semi-Bayes OR: 1.06, hierarchical regression OR: 1.26).<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Hierarchical regression could be a valuable tool in occupational studies in which disease risk is estimated for a large amount of occupations when we have information available on the key carcinogenic exposures involved in each occupation. With the constant progress in exposure assessment methods in occupational settings and the availability of Job Exposure Matrices, it should become easier to apply this approach.
format article
author Marine Corbin
Lorenzo Richiardi
Roel Vermeulen
Hans Kromhout
Franco Merletti
Susan Peters
Lorenzo Simonato
Kyle Steenland
Neil Pearce
Milena Maule
author_facet Marine Corbin
Lorenzo Richiardi
Roel Vermeulen
Hans Kromhout
Franco Merletti
Susan Peters
Lorenzo Simonato
Kyle Steenland
Neil Pearce
Milena Maule
author_sort Marine Corbin
title Hierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.
title_short Hierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.
title_full Hierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.
title_fullStr Hierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Hierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.
title_sort hierarchical regression for multiple comparisons in a case-control study of occupational risks for lung cancer.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/5088ee611e7f48d6aaa7d383b1ef5556
work_keys_str_mv AT marinecorbin hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT lorenzorichiardi hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT roelvermeulen hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT hanskromhout hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT francomerletti hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT susanpeters hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT lorenzosimonato hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT kylesteenland hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT neilpearce hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
AT milenamaule hierarchicalregressionformultiplecomparisonsinacasecontrolstudyofoccupationalrisksforlungcancer
_version_ 1718423724615532544