Adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation

In indoor navigation and visual odometry, cameras may be used as an aiding algorithm for inertial navigation. Fast and accurate image matching is an important task used in various applications in computer vision and visual odometry. In this research, the performances of all recently available detect...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamed Ramadan, Mohamed El Tokhey, Ayman Ragab, Tamer Fath-Allah, Ahmed Ragheb
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/50a4dca0f1634dd393bb4e1140751102
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:50a4dca0f1634dd393bb4e1140751102
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:50a4dca0f1634dd393bb4e11407511022021-11-22T04:23:00ZAdopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation2090-447910.1016/j.asej.2021.04.029https://doaj.org/article/50a4dca0f1634dd393bb4e11407511022021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447921002173https://doaj.org/toc/2090-4479In indoor navigation and visual odometry, cameras may be used as an aiding algorithm for inertial navigation. Fast and accurate image matching is an important task used in various applications in computer vision and visual odometry. In this research, the performances of all recently available detection, description, and matching techniques were compared. The detection techniques included HARRIS, GFTT, SIFT, SURF, STAR, FAST, ORB, MSER, Dense, and SimpleBlob. Feature description techniques included SIFT, SURF, ORB, and BRIEF. Finally, image matching techniques included BruteForce, BruteForce-L1, BruteForce-Hamming, BruteForce-HammingLUT, and FlannBased. The comparison was made between different kinds of geometric distortions and deformations, such as scaling, rotation, fish-eye distortion, and shearing. In this research, the lighting conditions and the shadowing effects were not taken into consideration.To perform this task, different types of transformations were manually applied to original images and computed with the matching evaluation parameters, such as the number of detected keypoints in images, the processing time, and the matching accuracies for each algorithm to show which algorithm was the best and most robust against these distortions. This work provided us with a perspective on and contributed to the field of image-based indoor navigation systems to recommend further research. The results showed that the ORB detector, the ORB descriptor, and either the BruteForce-Hamming or the BruteForce-HammingLUT matchers were favored to be used in indoor environments.Mohamed RamadanMohamed El TokheyAyman RagabTamer Fath-AllahAhmed RaghebElsevierarticleVisual odometryFeature detectorFeature descriptorImage matchingIndoor navigationRANSACEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAin Shams Engineering Journal, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 3649-3658 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Visual odometry
Feature detector
Feature descriptor
Image matching
Indoor navigation
RANSAC
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
spellingShingle Visual odometry
Feature detector
Feature descriptor
Image matching
Indoor navigation
RANSAC
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Mohamed Ramadan
Mohamed El Tokhey
Ayman Ragab
Tamer Fath-Allah
Ahmed Ragheb
Adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation
description In indoor navigation and visual odometry, cameras may be used as an aiding algorithm for inertial navigation. Fast and accurate image matching is an important task used in various applications in computer vision and visual odometry. In this research, the performances of all recently available detection, description, and matching techniques were compared. The detection techniques included HARRIS, GFTT, SIFT, SURF, STAR, FAST, ORB, MSER, Dense, and SimpleBlob. Feature description techniques included SIFT, SURF, ORB, and BRIEF. Finally, image matching techniques included BruteForce, BruteForce-L1, BruteForce-Hamming, BruteForce-HammingLUT, and FlannBased. The comparison was made between different kinds of geometric distortions and deformations, such as scaling, rotation, fish-eye distortion, and shearing. In this research, the lighting conditions and the shadowing effects were not taken into consideration.To perform this task, different types of transformations were manually applied to original images and computed with the matching evaluation parameters, such as the number of detected keypoints in images, the processing time, and the matching accuracies for each algorithm to show which algorithm was the best and most robust against these distortions. This work provided us with a perspective on and contributed to the field of image-based indoor navigation systems to recommend further research. The results showed that the ORB detector, the ORB descriptor, and either the BruteForce-Hamming or the BruteForce-HammingLUT matchers were favored to be used in indoor environments.
format article
author Mohamed Ramadan
Mohamed El Tokhey
Ayman Ragab
Tamer Fath-Allah
Ahmed Ragheb
author_facet Mohamed Ramadan
Mohamed El Tokhey
Ayman Ragab
Tamer Fath-Allah
Ahmed Ragheb
author_sort Mohamed Ramadan
title Adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation
title_short Adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation
title_full Adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation
title_fullStr Adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation
title_full_unstemmed Adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation
title_sort adopted image matching techniques for aiding indoor navigation
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/50a4dca0f1634dd393bb4e1140751102
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedramadan adoptedimagematchingtechniquesforaidingindoornavigation
AT mohamedeltokhey adoptedimagematchingtechniquesforaidingindoornavigation
AT aymanragab adoptedimagematchingtechniquesforaidingindoornavigation
AT tamerfathallah adoptedimagematchingtechniquesforaidingindoornavigation
AT ahmedragheb adoptedimagematchingtechniquesforaidingindoornavigation
_version_ 1718418220480724992