Quality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature

Gianfranco Damiani, Giulia Silvestrini, Lucrezia Trozzi, Donatella Maci, Lanfranco Iodice, Walter Ricciardi Department of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy Purpose: The aim of this paper was to explore the applicability of dementia...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damiani G, Silvestrini G, Trozzi L, Maci D, Iodice L, Ricciardi W
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/50b5d8c0672d445a935290c29b912c93
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:50b5d8c0672d445a935290c29b912c93
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:50b5d8c0672d445a935290c29b912c932021-12-02T06:54:46ZQuality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/50b5d8c0672d445a935290c29b912c932014-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/quality-of-dementia-clinical-guidelines-and-relevance-to-the-care-of-o-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Gianfranco Damiani, Giulia Silvestrini, Lucrezia Trozzi, Donatella Maci, Lanfranco Iodice, Walter Ricciardi Department of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy Purpose: The aim of this paper was to explore the applicability of dementia clinical guidelines (CGs) to older patients, to patients with one or several comorbidities, and to both targets in order to evaluate if an association between the applicability and quality of the CGs exists.Materials and methods: A systematic search strategy conducted on electronic databases identified CGs on diagnosis and treatment of dementia published from 2000 to 2013. In addition, websites of organizations devoted to the treatment and awareness of dementia were searched. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Two investigators independently scored the relevance of the CGs by means of a specific tool. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed (Mann–Whitney test, 0.05 α-level).Results: Twenty-two CGs met our inclusion criteria. On average, the quality of the CGs was higher than 70% in three of six domains measured by the AGREE tool. The domains with lower mean scores (less than 50%) were “Applicability” and “Editorial independence”. Considering applicability to older patients, 20 CGs (91%) addressed issues of treatment for older patients, five of them (23%) classified older patients by age, and 13 CGs (60%) addressed issues of comorbidity. Only seven (32%) discussed the quality of evidence for patients with multiple comorbid conditions. Thirteen CGs (60%) reported recommendations for patients with at least one comorbid condition, while seven of them (32%) reported on several comorbid conditions. No statistically significant association between CG quality and relevance to care of older people with or without comorbidity was found (P>0.05).Conclusion: This study showed that dementia CGs poorly address treatment for older patients with comorbidities, regardless of their quality. Therefore, they scarcely satisfy the need of modern clinical practice. Keywords: dementia, clinical guidelines, quality, older, comorbidityDamiani GSilvestrini GTrozzi LMaci DIodice LRicciardi WDove Medical PressarticleDementiaClinical GuidelinesQualityOlderComorbidityGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 9, Pp 1399-1407 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Dementia
Clinical Guidelines
Quality
Older
Comorbidity
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
spellingShingle Dementia
Clinical Guidelines
Quality
Older
Comorbidity
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
Damiani G
Silvestrini G
Trozzi L
Maci D
Iodice L
Ricciardi W
Quality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature
description Gianfranco Damiani, Giulia Silvestrini, Lucrezia Trozzi, Donatella Maci, Lanfranco Iodice, Walter Ricciardi Department of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy Purpose: The aim of this paper was to explore the applicability of dementia clinical guidelines (CGs) to older patients, to patients with one or several comorbidities, and to both targets in order to evaluate if an association between the applicability and quality of the CGs exists.Materials and methods: A systematic search strategy conducted on electronic databases identified CGs on diagnosis and treatment of dementia published from 2000 to 2013. In addition, websites of organizations devoted to the treatment and awareness of dementia were searched. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Two investigators independently scored the relevance of the CGs by means of a specific tool. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed (Mann–Whitney test, 0.05 α-level).Results: Twenty-two CGs met our inclusion criteria. On average, the quality of the CGs was higher than 70% in three of six domains measured by the AGREE tool. The domains with lower mean scores (less than 50%) were “Applicability” and “Editorial independence”. Considering applicability to older patients, 20 CGs (91%) addressed issues of treatment for older patients, five of them (23%) classified older patients by age, and 13 CGs (60%) addressed issues of comorbidity. Only seven (32%) discussed the quality of evidence for patients with multiple comorbid conditions. Thirteen CGs (60%) reported recommendations for patients with at least one comorbid condition, while seven of them (32%) reported on several comorbid conditions. No statistically significant association between CG quality and relevance to care of older people with or without comorbidity was found (P>0.05).Conclusion: This study showed that dementia CGs poorly address treatment for older patients with comorbidities, regardless of their quality. Therefore, they scarcely satisfy the need of modern clinical practice. Keywords: dementia, clinical guidelines, quality, older, comorbidity
format article
author Damiani G
Silvestrini G
Trozzi L
Maci D
Iodice L
Ricciardi W
author_facet Damiani G
Silvestrini G
Trozzi L
Maci D
Iodice L
Ricciardi W
author_sort Damiani G
title Quality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature
title_short Quality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature
title_full Quality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature
title_fullStr Quality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature
title_full_unstemmed Quality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature
title_sort quality of dementia clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with comorbidity: evidence from the literature
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/50b5d8c0672d445a935290c29b912c93
work_keys_str_mv AT damianig qualityofdementiaclinicalguidelinesandrelevancetothecareofolderpeoplewithcomorbidityevidencefromtheliterature
AT silvestrinig qualityofdementiaclinicalguidelinesandrelevancetothecareofolderpeoplewithcomorbidityevidencefromtheliterature
AT trozzil qualityofdementiaclinicalguidelinesandrelevancetothecareofolderpeoplewithcomorbidityevidencefromtheliterature
AT macid qualityofdementiaclinicalguidelinesandrelevancetothecareofolderpeoplewithcomorbidityevidencefromtheliterature
AT iodicel qualityofdementiaclinicalguidelinesandrelevancetothecareofolderpeoplewithcomorbidityevidencefromtheliterature
AT ricciardiw qualityofdementiaclinicalguidelinesandrelevancetothecareofolderpeoplewithcomorbidityevidencefromtheliterature
_version_ 1718399690718838784