Tax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China

This study investigated the R&D manipulation of Chinese listed companies under preferential tax policies based on the bunching approach. On this basis, differences in organizational performance aspirations were used to distinguish firm heterogeneity. This was to clarify how tax incentives affect...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wenyan Sun, Kedong Yin, Zhe Liu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/50e4f303fc6c4a0a9b32984c24bda0a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:50e4f303fc6c4a0a9b32984c24bda0a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:50e4f303fc6c4a0a9b32984c24bda0a42021-11-11T19:31:07ZTax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China10.3390/su1321118192071-1050https://doaj.org/article/50e4f303fc6c4a0a9b32984c24bda0a42021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11819https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050This study investigated the R&D manipulation of Chinese listed companies under preferential tax policies based on the bunching approach. On this basis, differences in organizational performance aspirations were used to distinguish firm heterogeneity. This was to clarify how tax incentives affected firm innovation performance. The empirical results show that preferential tax policies can effectively reduce the actual tax burden of high-tech enterprises. Some companies have enjoyed corporate income tax breaks by manipulating R&D spending. The counterfactual estimate of R&D intensity shows that the elasticity of taxable income of R&D investment of listed companies in China is between 0.55 and 0.8. The elasticity of taxable income of manufacturing enterprises is between 0.6 and 0.75. Furthermore, within the R&D operating range, firm-level variations will affect innovation performance. The incentive effect of R&D activities of enterprises with a negative organizational performance aspiration gap is higher than that of enterprises with a positive organizational performance aspiration gap. The conclusion provides the basis for the country to improve preferential tax policies for high-tech enterprises.Wenyan SunKedong YinZhe LiuMDPI AGarticletax incentivesR&D manipulationorganizational performance aspiration gapinnovation performanceEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 11819, p 11819 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic tax incentives
R&D manipulation
organizational performance aspiration gap
innovation performance
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle tax incentives
R&D manipulation
organizational performance aspiration gap
innovation performance
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Wenyan Sun
Kedong Yin
Zhe Liu
Tax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
description This study investigated the R&D manipulation of Chinese listed companies under preferential tax policies based on the bunching approach. On this basis, differences in organizational performance aspirations were used to distinguish firm heterogeneity. This was to clarify how tax incentives affected firm innovation performance. The empirical results show that preferential tax policies can effectively reduce the actual tax burden of high-tech enterprises. Some companies have enjoyed corporate income tax breaks by manipulating R&D spending. The counterfactual estimate of R&D intensity shows that the elasticity of taxable income of R&D investment of listed companies in China is between 0.55 and 0.8. The elasticity of taxable income of manufacturing enterprises is between 0.6 and 0.75. Furthermore, within the R&D operating range, firm-level variations will affect innovation performance. The incentive effect of R&D activities of enterprises with a negative organizational performance aspiration gap is higher than that of enterprises with a positive organizational performance aspiration gap. The conclusion provides the basis for the country to improve preferential tax policies for high-tech enterprises.
format article
author Wenyan Sun
Kedong Yin
Zhe Liu
author_facet Wenyan Sun
Kedong Yin
Zhe Liu
author_sort Wenyan Sun
title Tax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
title_short Tax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
title_full Tax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
title_fullStr Tax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
title_full_unstemmed Tax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
title_sort tax incentives, r&d manipulation, and corporate innovation performance: evidence from listed companies in china
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/50e4f303fc6c4a0a9b32984c24bda0a4
work_keys_str_mv AT wenyansun taxincentivesrdmanipulationandcorporateinnovationperformanceevidencefromlistedcompaniesinchina
AT kedongyin taxincentivesrdmanipulationandcorporateinnovationperformanceevidencefromlistedcompaniesinchina
AT zheliu taxincentivesrdmanipulationandcorporateinnovationperformanceevidencefromlistedcompaniesinchina
_version_ 1718431464674033664