Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review
Abstract Background Practice guidelines can reduce variations in nursing practice and improve patient care. However, implementation of guidelines is complex and inconsistent in practice. It is unclear which strategies are effective at implementing guidelines in nursing. This review aimed to describe...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/50fd607cea1c46f2845370d3ec88051e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:50fd607cea1c46f2845370d3ec88051e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:50fd607cea1c46f2845370d3ec88051e2021-12-05T12:17:51ZUse and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review10.1186/s13012-021-01165-51748-5908https://doaj.org/article/50fd607cea1c46f2845370d3ec88051e2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01165-5https://doaj.org/toc/1748-5908Abstract Background Practice guidelines can reduce variations in nursing practice and improve patient care. However, implementation of guidelines is complex and inconsistent in practice. It is unclear which strategies are effective at implementing guidelines in nursing. This review aimed to describe the use and effects of implementation strategies to facilitate the uptake of guidelines focused on nursing care. Methods We conducted a systematic review of five electronic databases in addition to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) Group specialized registry. Studies were included if implementation of a practice guideline in nursing and process or outcome of care provided by nurses were reported. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed study quality, extracted data, and coded data using the EPOC taxonomy of implementation strategies. For those strategies not included in the EPOC taxonomy, we inductively categorized these strategies and generated additional categories. We conducted a narrative synthesis to analyze results. Results The search identified 46 papers reporting on 41 studies. Thirty-six studies used a combination of educational materials and educational meetings. Review findings show that multicomponent implementation strategies that include educational meetings, in combination with other educational strategies, report positive effects on professional practice outcomes, professional knowledge outcomes, patient health status outcomes, and resource use/expenditures. Twenty-three of the 41 studies employed implementation strategies not listed within the EPOC taxonomy, including adaptation of practice guidelines to local context (n = 9), external facilitation (n = 14), and changes to organizational policy (n = 3). These implementation strategies also corresponded with positive trends in patient, provider, and health system outcomes. Conclusions Nursing guideline implementation may benefit from using the identified implementation strategies described in this review, including participatory approaches such as facilitation, adaptation of guidelines, and organizational policy changes. Further research is needed to understand how different implementation strategy components work in a nursing context and to what effect. As the field is still emerging, future reviews should also explore guideline implementation strategies in nursing in quasi or non-experimental research designs and qualitative research studies.Christine E. CassidyMargaret B. HarrisonChristina GodfreyVera NincicPaul A. KhanPatricia OakleyAmanda Ross-WhiteHilary GrantmyreIan D. GrahamBMCarticleClinical practice guidelinesNursingImplementationImplementation strategiesSystematic reviewMedicine (General)R5-920ENImplementation Science, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-29 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Clinical practice guidelines Nursing Implementation Implementation strategies Systematic review Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
Clinical practice guidelines Nursing Implementation Implementation strategies Systematic review Medicine (General) R5-920 Christine E. Cassidy Margaret B. Harrison Christina Godfrey Vera Nincic Paul A. Khan Patricia Oakley Amanda Ross-White Hilary Grantmyre Ian D. Graham Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review |
description |
Abstract Background Practice guidelines can reduce variations in nursing practice and improve patient care. However, implementation of guidelines is complex and inconsistent in practice. It is unclear which strategies are effective at implementing guidelines in nursing. This review aimed to describe the use and effects of implementation strategies to facilitate the uptake of guidelines focused on nursing care. Methods We conducted a systematic review of five electronic databases in addition to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) Group specialized registry. Studies were included if implementation of a practice guideline in nursing and process or outcome of care provided by nurses were reported. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed study quality, extracted data, and coded data using the EPOC taxonomy of implementation strategies. For those strategies not included in the EPOC taxonomy, we inductively categorized these strategies and generated additional categories. We conducted a narrative synthesis to analyze results. Results The search identified 46 papers reporting on 41 studies. Thirty-six studies used a combination of educational materials and educational meetings. Review findings show that multicomponent implementation strategies that include educational meetings, in combination with other educational strategies, report positive effects on professional practice outcomes, professional knowledge outcomes, patient health status outcomes, and resource use/expenditures. Twenty-three of the 41 studies employed implementation strategies not listed within the EPOC taxonomy, including adaptation of practice guidelines to local context (n = 9), external facilitation (n = 14), and changes to organizational policy (n = 3). These implementation strategies also corresponded with positive trends in patient, provider, and health system outcomes. Conclusions Nursing guideline implementation may benefit from using the identified implementation strategies described in this review, including participatory approaches such as facilitation, adaptation of guidelines, and organizational policy changes. Further research is needed to understand how different implementation strategy components work in a nursing context and to what effect. As the field is still emerging, future reviews should also explore guideline implementation strategies in nursing in quasi or non-experimental research designs and qualitative research studies. |
format |
article |
author |
Christine E. Cassidy Margaret B. Harrison Christina Godfrey Vera Nincic Paul A. Khan Patricia Oakley Amanda Ross-White Hilary Grantmyre Ian D. Graham |
author_facet |
Christine E. Cassidy Margaret B. Harrison Christina Godfrey Vera Nincic Paul A. Khan Patricia Oakley Amanda Ross-White Hilary Grantmyre Ian D. Graham |
author_sort |
Christine E. Cassidy |
title |
Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review |
title_short |
Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review |
title_full |
Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review |
title_sort |
use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/50fd607cea1c46f2845370d3ec88051e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christineecassidy useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview AT margaretbharrison useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview AT christinagodfrey useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview AT veranincic useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview AT paulakhan useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview AT patriciaoakley useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview AT amandarosswhite useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview AT hilarygrantmyre useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview AT iandgraham useandeffectsofimplementationstrategiesforpracticeguidelinesinnursingasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1718372073604120576 |