Thirty Years from the End of the USSR

The article contains a brief retrospective assessment of the reasons given by various scholars and observers for the breakdown of the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev’s leadership and it situates that crisis in the larger context of history and the imperial legacy of the Russian state. It partic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: C. C. Gourdon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5139eabc56fa48bfb95c1781afe60379
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5139eabc56fa48bfb95c1781afe60379
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5139eabc56fa48bfb95c1781afe603792021-11-07T14:45:05ZThirty Years from the End of the USSR2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-5-13https://doaj.org/article/5139eabc56fa48bfb95c1781afe603792021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/862https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324The article contains a brief retrospective assessment of the reasons given by various scholars and observers for the breakdown of the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev’s leadership and it situates that crisis in the larger context of history and the imperial legacy of the Russian state. It particularly looks at the issue of nationality as an ethnic, cultural and linguistic concept vis-a-vis the universalistic notion of empire as a community of destiny among diverse people. The author compares the Soviet Union’s structure as a ‘non classical’ empire to those of other European states and especially to Germany’s which has also evolved from being a loose Central and East European ‘Reich’ inspired by the Roman and Carolingian heritage – to becoming a federal nation surrounded by smaller countries that share with it ancient civilisational and political legacy. Whereas Germany is gradually asserting leadership among many of its former dependencies and in the post-Brexit European Union as a whole, Russia is led by geographical and strategic compulsions to rebuild a Eurasian confederal association with erstwhile Soviet Republics and possessions of the Tsarist Empire, in conformity with its location between the ‘West’, the Islamosphere and the Chinese world. Will Russia be able to create a synthesis between the Slav Orthodox Oikoumene envisioned by Nikolay Danilevsky and the Eurasian syncretistic model promoted by Lev Gumilyov?C. C. GourdonАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articlerussiasoviet unionholy roman empiregerman reicheuropean unionpan-slavismcivilisationchinabrexitnatowarsaw pactcomeconfive eyes allianceunited statesbelt and road initiative (bri)nord streameurasian economic unionshanghai cooperation organisationInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 14, Iss 5, Pp 247-257 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic russia
soviet union
holy roman empire
german reich
european union
pan-slavism
civilisation
china
brexit
nato
warsaw pact
comecon
five eyes alliance
united states
belt and road initiative (bri)
nord stream
eurasian economic union
shanghai cooperation organisation
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle russia
soviet union
holy roman empire
german reich
european union
pan-slavism
civilisation
china
brexit
nato
warsaw pact
comecon
five eyes alliance
united states
belt and road initiative (bri)
nord stream
eurasian economic union
shanghai cooperation organisation
International relations
JZ2-6530
C. C. Gourdon
Thirty Years from the End of the USSR
description The article contains a brief retrospective assessment of the reasons given by various scholars and observers for the breakdown of the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev’s leadership and it situates that crisis in the larger context of history and the imperial legacy of the Russian state. It particularly looks at the issue of nationality as an ethnic, cultural and linguistic concept vis-a-vis the universalistic notion of empire as a community of destiny among diverse people. The author compares the Soviet Union’s structure as a ‘non classical’ empire to those of other European states and especially to Germany’s which has also evolved from being a loose Central and East European ‘Reich’ inspired by the Roman and Carolingian heritage – to becoming a federal nation surrounded by smaller countries that share with it ancient civilisational and political legacy. Whereas Germany is gradually asserting leadership among many of its former dependencies and in the post-Brexit European Union as a whole, Russia is led by geographical and strategic compulsions to rebuild a Eurasian confederal association with erstwhile Soviet Republics and possessions of the Tsarist Empire, in conformity with its location between the ‘West’, the Islamosphere and the Chinese world. Will Russia be able to create a synthesis between the Slav Orthodox Oikoumene envisioned by Nikolay Danilevsky and the Eurasian syncretistic model promoted by Lev Gumilyov?
format article
author C. C. Gourdon
author_facet C. C. Gourdon
author_sort C. C. Gourdon
title Thirty Years from the End of the USSR
title_short Thirty Years from the End of the USSR
title_full Thirty Years from the End of the USSR
title_fullStr Thirty Years from the End of the USSR
title_full_unstemmed Thirty Years from the End of the USSR
title_sort thirty years from the end of the ussr
publisher Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5139eabc56fa48bfb95c1781afe60379
work_keys_str_mv AT ccgourdon thirtyyearsfromtheendoftheussr
_version_ 1718443350429794304