Brachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

We describe a case of an 80-year-old male patient with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI). The most common and preferred type of transcatheter valve delivery is through the femoral artery. However, if transfemoral access is not possible, an altern...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robert Topalo, Petr Hájek, Karel Vik, Radka Adlová, Milan Horn, Josef Veselka
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/51481f5daf314688904e12e59db7b393
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:51481f5daf314688904e12e59db7b393
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:51481f5daf314688904e12e59db7b3932021-12-02T17:18:42ZBrachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation1734-93381897-429510.5114/aic.2021.104782https://doaj.org/article/51481f5daf314688904e12e59db7b3932021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.termedia.pl/Brachial-artery-access-for-transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation,35,43651,1,1.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1734-9338https://doaj.org/toc/1897-4295We describe a case of an 80-year-old male patient with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI). The most common and preferred type of transcatheter valve delivery is through the femoral artery. However, if transfemoral access is not possible, an alternate route may be chosen. Such routes include, but are not limited to, direct aortic access, subclavian/axillary access, or transapical access, each one having their advantages and disadvantages [1, 2]. In our patient, transfemoral access was not possible due to extreme tortuosity of both pelvic arteries revealed on preoperative angiography. Computed tomography (CT) angiography was used to assess the diameter of the subclavian, axillary and brachial arteries (Figures 1 A, B). Duplex ultrasound verified the proximal diameter of the right brachial artery to be 6.7 mm (Figure 1 C). This diameter was sufficient to perform TAVI with an Evolut R 34 mm valve via the brachial artery. This approach offers multiple benefits, primarily, relatively easy access, avoidance of preparation of an artery in the otherwise very complex axillary and subclavian region, therefore decreasing chances of iatrogenic injury, and a quick recovery after the procedure. Other benefits of transbrachial delivery are usually minimal tortuosity of the arterial segment and minimal calcification. A major limitation of this approach is the diameter of the brachial artery. Other disadvantages are the same as for subclavian/axillary access and involve the angle of the aorta from the horizontal plane, as well as the unfavorable angle of valve delivery into the left ventricular outflow tract.Robert TopaloPetr HájekKarel VikRadka AdlováMilan HornJosef VeselkaTermedia Publishing HousearticleMedicineRENAdvances in Interventional Cardiology, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 124-125 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Robert Topalo
Petr Hájek
Karel Vik
Radka Adlová
Milan Horn
Josef Veselka
Brachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
description We describe a case of an 80-year-old male patient with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI). The most common and preferred type of transcatheter valve delivery is through the femoral artery. However, if transfemoral access is not possible, an alternate route may be chosen. Such routes include, but are not limited to, direct aortic access, subclavian/axillary access, or transapical access, each one having their advantages and disadvantages [1, 2]. In our patient, transfemoral access was not possible due to extreme tortuosity of both pelvic arteries revealed on preoperative angiography. Computed tomography (CT) angiography was used to assess the diameter of the subclavian, axillary and brachial arteries (Figures 1 A, B). Duplex ultrasound verified the proximal diameter of the right brachial artery to be 6.7 mm (Figure 1 C). This diameter was sufficient to perform TAVI with an Evolut R 34 mm valve via the brachial artery. This approach offers multiple benefits, primarily, relatively easy access, avoidance of preparation of an artery in the otherwise very complex axillary and subclavian region, therefore decreasing chances of iatrogenic injury, and a quick recovery after the procedure. Other benefits of transbrachial delivery are usually minimal tortuosity of the arterial segment and minimal calcification. A major limitation of this approach is the diameter of the brachial artery. Other disadvantages are the same as for subclavian/axillary access and involve the angle of the aorta from the horizontal plane, as well as the unfavorable angle of valve delivery into the left ventricular outflow tract.
format article
author Robert Topalo
Petr Hájek
Karel Vik
Radka Adlová
Milan Horn
Josef Veselka
author_facet Robert Topalo
Petr Hájek
Karel Vik
Radka Adlová
Milan Horn
Josef Veselka
author_sort Robert Topalo
title Brachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_short Brachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_full Brachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_fullStr Brachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_full_unstemmed Brachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_sort brachial artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
publisher Termedia Publishing House
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/51481f5daf314688904e12e59db7b393
work_keys_str_mv AT roberttopalo brachialarteryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT petrhajek brachialarteryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT karelvik brachialarteryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT radkaadlova brachialarteryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT milanhorn brachialarteryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT josefveselka brachialarteryaccessfortranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
_version_ 1718381084647882752