Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness

Social interactions among people are often repeated, and yet it is assumed that simultaneous interactions are independent from one another. Here, Reiter and colleagues describe a conceptual framework where an action in one game can influence the decision in another.

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Johannes G. Reiter, Christian Hilbe, David G. Rand, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin A. Nowak
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:	Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/518c3894b3ba486192f2c960aae8227e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:518c3894b3ba486192f2c960aae8227e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:518c3894b3ba486192f2c960aae8227e2021-12-02T15:34:04ZCrosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness10.1038/s41467-017-02721-82041-1723https://doaj.org/article/518c3894b3ba486192f2c960aae8227e2018-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02721-8https://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723Social interactions among people are often repeated, and yet it is assumed that simultaneous interactions are independent from one another. Here, Reiter and colleagues describe a conceptual framework where an action in one game can influence the decision in another.Johannes G. ReiterChristian HilbeDavid G. RandKrishnendu ChatterjeeMartin A. NowakNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Science Q
spellingShingle	Science Q Johannes G. Reiter Christian Hilbe David G. Rand Krishnendu Chatterjee Martin A. Nowak Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness
description	Social interactions among people are often repeated, and yet it is assumed that simultaneous interactions are independent from one another. Here, Reiter and colleagues describe a conceptual framework where an action in one game can influence the decision in another.
format	article
author	Johannes G. Reiter Christian Hilbe David G. Rand Krishnendu Chatterjee Martin A. Nowak
author_facet	Johannes G. Reiter Christian Hilbe David G. Rand Krishnendu Chatterjee Martin A. Nowak
author_sort	Johannes G. Reiter
title	Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness
title_short	Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness
title_full	Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness
title_fullStr	Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness
title_full_unstemmed	Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness
title_sort	crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/518c3894b3ba486192f2c960aae8227e
work_keys_str_mv	AT johannesgreiter crosstalkinconcurrentrepeatedgamesimpedesdirectreciprocityandrequiresstrongerlevelsofforgiveness AT christianhilbe crosstalkinconcurrentrepeatedgamesimpedesdirectreciprocityandrequiresstrongerlevelsofforgiveness AT davidgrand crosstalkinconcurrentrepeatedgamesimpedesdirectreciprocityandrequiresstrongerlevelsofforgiveness AT krishnenduchatterjee crosstalkinconcurrentrepeatedgamesimpedesdirectreciprocityandrequiresstrongerlevelsofforgiveness AT martinanowak crosstalkinconcurrentrepeatedgamesimpedesdirectreciprocityandrequiresstrongerlevelsofforgiveness
_version_	1718386959795093504

Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness

Ejemplares similares