RLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test

Abstract Background Nucleic acid-based amplification tests (NAAT), above all (q)PCR, have been applied for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae in leprosy cases and household contacts with subclinical infection. However, their application in the field poses a range of technical challenges. Loop-med...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malkin Saar, Marcus Beissner, Fatih Gültekin, Issaka Maman, Karl-Heinz Herbinger, Gisela Bretzel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/51ac95916c7c4962a68caa0178e6a95b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:51ac95916c7c4962a68caa0178e6a95b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:51ac95916c7c4962a68caa0178e6a95b2021-11-28T12:41:35ZRLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test10.1186/s12879-021-06882-21471-2334https://doaj.org/article/51ac95916c7c4962a68caa0178e6a95b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06882-2https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2334Abstract Background Nucleic acid-based amplification tests (NAAT), above all (q)PCR, have been applied for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae in leprosy cases and household contacts with subclinical infection. However, their application in the field poses a range of technical challenges. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), as a promising point-of-care NAAT does not require sophisticated laboratory equipment, is easy to perform, and is applicable for decentralized diagnosis at the primary health care level. Among a range of gene targets, the M. leprae specific repetitive element RLEP is regarded as highly sensitive and specific for diagnostic applications.  Methods Our group developed and validated a dry-reagent-based (DRB) RLEP LAMP, provided product specifications for customization of a ready-to-use kit (intended for commercial production) and compared it against the in-house prototype. The assays were optimized for application on a Genie® III portable fluorometer. For technical validation, 40 “must not detect RLEP” samples derived from RLEP qPCR negative exposed and non-exposed individuals, as well as from patients with other conditions and a set of closely related mycobacterial cultures, were tested together with 25 “must detect RLEP” samples derived from qPCR confirmed leprosy patients. For clinical validation, 150 RLEP qPCR tested samples were analyzed, consisting of the following categories: high-positive samples of multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients (> 10.000 bacilli/extract), medium-positive samples of MB leprosy patients (1.001–10.000 bacilli/extract), low-positive samples of MB leprosy patients (1–1.000 bacilli/extract), endemic controls and healthy non-exposed controls; each n = 30.  Results Technical validation: both LAMP formats had a limit of detection of 1.000 RLEP copies, i.e. 43–27 bacilli, a sensitivity of 92% (in-house protocol)/100% (ready-to-use protocol) and a specificity of 100%. Reagents were stable for at least 1 year at 22 °C. Clinical validation: Both formats showed a negativity rate of 100% and a positivity rate of 100% for high-positive samples and 93–100% for medium positive samples, together with a positive predictive value of 100% and semi-quantitative results. The positivity rate for low-positive samples was 77% (in-house protocol)/43% (ready-to-use protocol) and differed significantly between both formats.  Conclusions The ready-to-use RLEP DRB LAMP assay constitutes an ASSURED test ready for field-based evaluation trials aiming for routine diagnosis of leprosy at the primary health care level.Malkin SaarMarcus BeissnerFatih GültekinIssaka MamanKarl-Heinz HerbingerGisela BretzelBMCarticleMycobacterium lepraeLeprosyNAATLAMPRLEPDry-reagent-basedInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216ENBMC Infectious Diseases, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Mycobacterium leprae
Leprosy
NAAT
LAMP
RLEP
Dry-reagent-based
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Mycobacterium leprae
Leprosy
NAAT
LAMP
RLEP
Dry-reagent-based
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Malkin Saar
Marcus Beissner
Fatih Gültekin
Issaka Maman
Karl-Heinz Herbinger
Gisela Bretzel
RLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test
description Abstract Background Nucleic acid-based amplification tests (NAAT), above all (q)PCR, have been applied for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae in leprosy cases and household contacts with subclinical infection. However, their application in the field poses a range of technical challenges. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), as a promising point-of-care NAAT does not require sophisticated laboratory equipment, is easy to perform, and is applicable for decentralized diagnosis at the primary health care level. Among a range of gene targets, the M. leprae specific repetitive element RLEP is regarded as highly sensitive and specific for diagnostic applications.  Methods Our group developed and validated a dry-reagent-based (DRB) RLEP LAMP, provided product specifications for customization of a ready-to-use kit (intended for commercial production) and compared it against the in-house prototype. The assays were optimized for application on a Genie® III portable fluorometer. For technical validation, 40 “must not detect RLEP” samples derived from RLEP qPCR negative exposed and non-exposed individuals, as well as from patients with other conditions and a set of closely related mycobacterial cultures, were tested together with 25 “must detect RLEP” samples derived from qPCR confirmed leprosy patients. For clinical validation, 150 RLEP qPCR tested samples were analyzed, consisting of the following categories: high-positive samples of multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients (> 10.000 bacilli/extract), medium-positive samples of MB leprosy patients (1.001–10.000 bacilli/extract), low-positive samples of MB leprosy patients (1–1.000 bacilli/extract), endemic controls and healthy non-exposed controls; each n = 30.  Results Technical validation: both LAMP formats had a limit of detection of 1.000 RLEP copies, i.e. 43–27 bacilli, a sensitivity of 92% (in-house protocol)/100% (ready-to-use protocol) and a specificity of 100%. Reagents were stable for at least 1 year at 22 °C. Clinical validation: Both formats showed a negativity rate of 100% and a positivity rate of 100% for high-positive samples and 93–100% for medium positive samples, together with a positive predictive value of 100% and semi-quantitative results. The positivity rate for low-positive samples was 77% (in-house protocol)/43% (ready-to-use protocol) and differed significantly between both formats.  Conclusions The ready-to-use RLEP DRB LAMP assay constitutes an ASSURED test ready for field-based evaluation trials aiming for routine diagnosis of leprosy at the primary health care level.
format article
author Malkin Saar
Marcus Beissner
Fatih Gültekin
Issaka Maman
Karl-Heinz Herbinger
Gisela Bretzel
author_facet Malkin Saar
Marcus Beissner
Fatih Gültekin
Issaka Maman
Karl-Heinz Herbinger
Gisela Bretzel
author_sort Malkin Saar
title RLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test
title_short RLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test
title_full RLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test
title_fullStr RLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test
title_full_unstemmed RLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test
title_sort rlep lamp for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/51ac95916c7c4962a68caa0178e6a95b
work_keys_str_mv AT malkinsaar rleplampforthelaboratoryconfirmationofleprosytowardsapointofcaretest
AT marcusbeissner rleplampforthelaboratoryconfirmationofleprosytowardsapointofcaretest
AT fatihgultekin rleplampforthelaboratoryconfirmationofleprosytowardsapointofcaretest
AT issakamaman rleplampforthelaboratoryconfirmationofleprosytowardsapointofcaretest
AT karlheinzherbinger rleplampforthelaboratoryconfirmationofleprosytowardsapointofcaretest
AT giselabretzel rleplampforthelaboratoryconfirmationofleprosytowardsapointofcaretest
_version_ 1718407831955177472