Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
BackgroundStructured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5220edf0a511411ebccb29a0e3cd0600 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5220edf0a511411ebccb29a0e3cd0600 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5220edf0a511411ebccb29a0e3cd06002021-12-01T20:31:20ZStructured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal1664-239210.3389/fendo.2021.748944https://doaj.org/article/5220edf0a511411ebccb29a0e3cd06002021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.748944/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392BackgroundStructured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams.Materials and MethodsA panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A Modified Delphi process was used to develop the SR and to assess a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation.ResultsThe final SR version was built by including n=16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n=13 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n=8 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n=17 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 54 items were included in the final version of the SR. Both in the first and second round, all sections received more than a good rating: a mean value of 4.7 and range of 4.2-5.0 in the first round and a mean value 4.9 and range of 4.9-5 in the second round. In the first round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a poor 0.57: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.7 (range 1-5) and 728 (mean value 52.00 and standard deviation 2.83), respectively. In the second round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a good 0.82: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.9 (range 4-5) and 760 (mean value 54.29 and standard deviation 1.64), respectively.ConclusionsThe present SR, based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise following in-depth discussion between expert radiologists in gastro-enteric and oncological imaging, derived from a multidisciplinary agreement between a radiologist, medical oncologist and surgeon in order to obtain the most appropriate communication tool for referring physicians.Vincenza GranataFrancesca CoppolaRoberta GrassiRoberta GrassiRoberta FuscoSalvatore TafutoFrancesco IzzoAlfonso ReginelliNicola MaggialettiDuccio BuccicardiBarbara FrittoliMarco RengoChandra BortolottoRoberto ProstGiorgia Viola LacasellaMarco MontellaEleonora CiaghiFrancesco BellifemineFederica De MuzioGinevra DantiGiulia GrazziniMassimo De FilippoSalvatore CappabiancaCarmelo BarresiFranco IafrateLuca Pio StoppinoAndrea LaghiRoberto GrassiRoberto GrassiLuca BruneseEmanuele NeriEmanuele NeriVittorio MieleVittorio MieleLorenzo FaggioniFrontiers Media S.A.articleradiology reportstructured reportstagingneuroendocrine neoplasmcomputed tomographyDiseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinologyRC648-665ENFrontiers in Endocrinology, Vol 12 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
radiology report structured report staging neuroendocrine neoplasm computed tomography Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology RC648-665 |
| spellingShingle |
radiology report structured report staging neuroendocrine neoplasm computed tomography Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology RC648-665 Vincenza Granata Francesca Coppola Roberta Grassi Roberta Grassi Roberta Fusco Salvatore Tafuto Francesco Izzo Alfonso Reginelli Nicola Maggialetti Duccio Buccicardi Barbara Frittoli Marco Rengo Chandra Bortolotto Roberto Prost Giorgia Viola Lacasella Marco Montella Eleonora Ciaghi Francesco Bellifemine Federica De Muzio Ginevra Danti Giulia Grazzini Massimo De Filippo Salvatore Cappabianca Carmelo Barresi Franco Iafrate Luca Pio Stoppino Andrea Laghi Roberto Grassi Roberto Grassi Luca Brunese Emanuele Neri Emanuele Neri Vittorio Miele Vittorio Miele Lorenzo Faggioni Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| description |
BackgroundStructured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams.Materials and MethodsA panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A Modified Delphi process was used to develop the SR and to assess a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation.ResultsThe final SR version was built by including n=16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n=13 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n=8 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n=17 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 54 items were included in the final version of the SR. Both in the first and second round, all sections received more than a good rating: a mean value of 4.7 and range of 4.2-5.0 in the first round and a mean value 4.9 and range of 4.9-5 in the second round. In the first round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a poor 0.57: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.7 (range 1-5) and 728 (mean value 52.00 and standard deviation 2.83), respectively. In the second round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a good 0.82: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.9 (range 4-5) and 760 (mean value 54.29 and standard deviation 1.64), respectively.ConclusionsThe present SR, based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise following in-depth discussion between expert radiologists in gastro-enteric and oncological imaging, derived from a multidisciplinary agreement between a radiologist, medical oncologist and surgeon in order to obtain the most appropriate communication tool for referring physicians. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Vincenza Granata Francesca Coppola Roberta Grassi Roberta Grassi Roberta Fusco Salvatore Tafuto Francesco Izzo Alfonso Reginelli Nicola Maggialetti Duccio Buccicardi Barbara Frittoli Marco Rengo Chandra Bortolotto Roberto Prost Giorgia Viola Lacasella Marco Montella Eleonora Ciaghi Francesco Bellifemine Federica De Muzio Ginevra Danti Giulia Grazzini Massimo De Filippo Salvatore Cappabianca Carmelo Barresi Franco Iafrate Luca Pio Stoppino Andrea Laghi Roberto Grassi Roberto Grassi Luca Brunese Emanuele Neri Emanuele Neri Vittorio Miele Vittorio Miele Lorenzo Faggioni |
| author_facet |
Vincenza Granata Francesca Coppola Roberta Grassi Roberta Grassi Roberta Fusco Salvatore Tafuto Francesco Izzo Alfonso Reginelli Nicola Maggialetti Duccio Buccicardi Barbara Frittoli Marco Rengo Chandra Bortolotto Roberto Prost Giorgia Viola Lacasella Marco Montella Eleonora Ciaghi Francesco Bellifemine Federica De Muzio Ginevra Danti Giulia Grazzini Massimo De Filippo Salvatore Cappabianca Carmelo Barresi Franco Iafrate Luca Pio Stoppino Andrea Laghi Roberto Grassi Roberto Grassi Luca Brunese Emanuele Neri Emanuele Neri Vittorio Miele Vittorio Miele Lorenzo Faggioni |
| author_sort |
Vincenza Granata |
| title |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_short |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_full |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_fullStr |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_sort |
structured reporting of computed tomography in the staging of neuroendocrine neoplasms: a delphi consensus proposal |
| publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/5220edf0a511411ebccb29a0e3cd0600 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT vincenzagranata structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT francescacoppola structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT robertagrassi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT robertagrassi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT robertafusco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT salvatoretafuto structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT francescoizzo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT alfonsoreginelli structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT nicolamaggialetti structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT ducciobuccicardi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT barbarafrittoli structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT marcorengo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT chandrabortolotto structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT robertoprost structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT giorgiaviolalacasella structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT marcomontella structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT eleonoraciaghi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT francescobellifemine structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT federicademuzio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT ginevradanti structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT giuliagrazzini structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT massimodefilippo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT salvatorecappabianca structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT carmelobarresi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT francoiafrate structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT lucapiostoppino structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT andrealaghi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT robertograssi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT robertograssi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT lucabrunese structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT emanueleneri structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT emanueleneri structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT vittoriomiele structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT vittoriomiele structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT lorenzofaggioni structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal |
| _version_ |
1718404572080242688 |