A Comparative Study of Organizational Pathological Patterns: A Strategy for Iranian Organizations

The purpose of this study was a comparative investigation of organizational pathology patterns in order to provide a suitable strategy for Iranian organizations. In order to identify and classify the effective components in organizational pathological patterns and achieve a comprehensive model, we c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hamid Rahimi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Comparative Education Society of Iran ( CESIR) 2020
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/522f167fc5dc471a8ebb6003715ae4d8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:522f167fc5dc471a8ebb6003715ae4d8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:522f167fc5dc471a8ebb6003715ae4d82021-11-17T10:05:20ZA Comparative Study of Organizational Pathological Patterns: A Strategy for Iranian Organizations2588-72702676-498910.22034/ijce.2020.233310.1162https://doaj.org/article/522f167fc5dc471a8ebb6003715ae4d82020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journal.cesir.ir/article_119276_d4e13a2737ecefef1f402f1aa9c63ce9.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2588-7270https://doaj.org/toc/2676-4989The purpose of this study was a comparative investigation of organizational pathology patterns in order to provide a suitable strategy for Iranian organizations. In order to identify and classify the effective components in organizational pathological patterns and achieve a comprehensive model, we can use the analysis and comparison of existing models. The method of the present study was a qualitative comparative based on content analysis approach. The statistical population including all organizational pathology models and sample of research was selected through purposive sampling method. Data collection method documentary and data were evaluated through internal (content accuracy) and external evaluations (document accuracy). Qualitative content analysis method was also used to analyze the data. Findings reveal that in most of the existing models for organizational pathology, designers have considered dimensions such as structure, systems, goals and missions, strategies, management and leadership styles, communication and environment. In addition, the main difference among patterns is in the financial, marketing and customer orientation dimensions. Another finding of the research is that most models emphasize organizational aspects more than individual dimensions. According to the research findings, organizational decision-makers are advised to choose a model to determine and identify the pathology of their organization that has more in common with other existing models and is also more appropriate to prevalent conditions of Iranian educational organizations.Hamid RahimiComparative Education Society of Iran ( CESIR)articleorganizationpatternpathologystrategyEducationLENIranian Journal of Comparative Education, Vol 3, Iss 4, Pp 907-921 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic organization
pattern
pathology
strategy
Education
L
spellingShingle organization
pattern
pathology
strategy
Education
L
Hamid Rahimi
A Comparative Study of Organizational Pathological Patterns: A Strategy for Iranian Organizations
description The purpose of this study was a comparative investigation of organizational pathology patterns in order to provide a suitable strategy for Iranian organizations. In order to identify and classify the effective components in organizational pathological patterns and achieve a comprehensive model, we can use the analysis and comparison of existing models. The method of the present study was a qualitative comparative based on content analysis approach. The statistical population including all organizational pathology models and sample of research was selected through purposive sampling method. Data collection method documentary and data were evaluated through internal (content accuracy) and external evaluations (document accuracy). Qualitative content analysis method was also used to analyze the data. Findings reveal that in most of the existing models for organizational pathology, designers have considered dimensions such as structure, systems, goals and missions, strategies, management and leadership styles, communication and environment. In addition, the main difference among patterns is in the financial, marketing and customer orientation dimensions. Another finding of the research is that most models emphasize organizational aspects more than individual dimensions. According to the research findings, organizational decision-makers are advised to choose a model to determine and identify the pathology of their organization that has more in common with other existing models and is also more appropriate to prevalent conditions of Iranian educational organizations.
format article
author Hamid Rahimi
author_facet Hamid Rahimi
author_sort Hamid Rahimi
title A Comparative Study of Organizational Pathological Patterns: A Strategy for Iranian Organizations
title_short A Comparative Study of Organizational Pathological Patterns: A Strategy for Iranian Organizations
title_full A Comparative Study of Organizational Pathological Patterns: A Strategy for Iranian Organizations
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Organizational Pathological Patterns: A Strategy for Iranian Organizations
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Organizational Pathological Patterns: A Strategy for Iranian Organizations
title_sort comparative study of organizational pathological patterns: a strategy for iranian organizations
publisher Comparative Education Society of Iran ( CESIR)
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/522f167fc5dc471a8ebb6003715ae4d8
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidrahimi acomparativestudyoforganizationalpathologicalpatternsastrategyforiranianorganizations
AT hamidrahimi comparativestudyoforganizationalpathologicalpatternsastrategyforiranianorganizations
_version_ 1718425611062476800