NASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON

Objective: To assess the level of consensus regarding nasolabial angle among Orthodontists, Maxillofacial surgeons and Plastic surgeons. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration: Rawalpindi, Islamabad and Lahore, from Jan 2018 to Mar 2018. Methodology: A total of 250 surveys for...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zahra Khalid, Maheen Khan, Rumeesha Zaheer, Ahmed Tanveer
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2019
Materias:	cephalogram measurement nasolabial angle Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5273494962e74895970f69537e1b9ee5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5273494962e74895970f69537e1b9ee5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5273494962e74895970f69537e1b9ee52021-11-08T05:02:20ZNASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON0030-96482411-8842https://doaj.org/article/5273494962e74895970f69537e1b9ee52019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/3661/2482https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective: To assess the level of consensus regarding nasolabial angle among Orthodontists, Maxillofacial surgeons and Plastic surgeons. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration: Rawalpindi, Islamabad and Lahore, from Jan 2018 to Mar 2018. Methodology: A total of 250 surveys forms were distributed by hand and online to the residents and consultants of Orthodontics, Oral and Maxillofacial surgery and Plastic surgery. 205 forms were received back and responses were then entered in and analyzed on SPSS version 22. Fishers exact test was used to associate the specialty and years of experience with the method of measuring nasolabial angle and p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty six (12.7%) of the 205 respondents revealed that they assess the nasolabial angle on Photograph, 87 (42.4%) use Lateral cephalogram and 92 (44.9%) assess directly on patients. Maximum respondents i.e. 150 (73%) chose option A i.e., angle between columella and line intersecting subnasale and labrale superius as the method of measuring the angle. The reason of preference varied among all the specialties. Statistically significant differences were found among clinicians of different specialties and years of clinical experience for the preferred method for measuring the nasolabial angle (p-value <0.001). More experienced clinicians estimated the angle on the patients face on profile view, more orthodontists used lateral cephalogram and plastic surgeons preferred patients profile view clinically. Conclusion: A consensus was reached for the method of measuring nasolabial angle but there was no consensus for the medium of measurement among different specialties.Zahra KhalidMaheen KhanRumeesha ZaheerAhmed TanveerArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticlecephalogrammeasurementnasolabial angleMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 69, Iss 6, Pp 1335-1340 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	cephalogram measurement nasolabial angle Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	cephalogram measurement nasolabial angle Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 Zahra Khalid Maheen Khan Rumeesha Zaheer Ahmed Tanveer NASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON
description	Objective: To assess the level of consensus regarding nasolabial angle among Orthodontists, Maxillofacial surgeons and Plastic surgeons. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration: Rawalpindi, Islamabad and Lahore, from Jan 2018 to Mar 2018. Methodology: A total of 250 surveys forms were distributed by hand and online to the residents and consultants of Orthodontics, Oral and Maxillofacial surgery and Plastic surgery. 205 forms were received back and responses were then entered in and analyzed on SPSS version 22. Fishers exact test was used to associate the specialty and years of experience with the method of measuring nasolabial angle and p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty six (12.7%) of the 205 respondents revealed that they assess the nasolabial angle on Photograph, 87 (42.4%) use Lateral cephalogram and 92 (44.9%) assess directly on patients. Maximum respondents i.e. 150 (73%) chose option A i.e., angle between columella and line intersecting subnasale and labrale superius as the method of measuring the angle. The reason of preference varied among all the specialties. Statistically significant differences were found among clinicians of different specialties and years of clinical experience for the preferred method for measuring the nasolabial angle (p-value <0.001). More experienced clinicians estimated the angle on the patients face on profile view, more orthodontists used lateral cephalogram and plastic surgeons preferred patients profile view clinically. Conclusion: A consensus was reached for the method of measuring nasolabial angle but there was no consensus for the medium of measurement among different specialties.
format	article
author	Zahra Khalid Maheen Khan Rumeesha Zaheer Ahmed Tanveer
author_facet	Zahra Khalid Maheen Khan Rumeesha Zaheer Ahmed Tanveer
author_sort	Zahra Khalid
title	NASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON
title_short	NASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON
title_full	NASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON
title_fullStr	NASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON
title_full_unstemmed	NASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON
title_sort	nasolabial angle: searching for a consensus among orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons and plastic surgeon
publisher	Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/5273494962e74895970f69537e1b9ee5
work_keys_str_mv	AT zahrakhalid nasolabialanglesearchingforaconsensusamongorthodontistsmaxillofacialsurgeonsandplasticsurgeon AT maheenkhan nasolabialanglesearchingforaconsensusamongorthodontistsmaxillofacialsurgeonsandplasticsurgeon AT rumeeshazaheer nasolabialanglesearchingforaconsensusamongorthodontistsmaxillofacialsurgeonsandplasticsurgeon AT ahmedtanveer nasolabialanglesearchingforaconsensusamongorthodontistsmaxillofacialsurgeonsandplasticsurgeon
_version_	1718443000900616192

NASOLABIAL ANGLE: SEARCHING FOR A CONSENSUS AMONG ORTHODONTISTS, MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS AND PLASTIC SURGEON

Ejemplares similares