Effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure

Equivalence – Equivalence responding (Barnes et al., 1997), based on derived or non-explicitly trained relational responding, supports a behaviour-analytic model of analogical reasoning. Conditional discriminations are the most common procedure used to train its prerequisites. In this exploratory wo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Andres Garcia, Fatima Pérez González, Rocío Martín Vera, Mayte Gutiérrez Domínguez, Jesús Gómez Bujedo, Vicente Pérez Fernández, Santiago Benjumea Rodriguez
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ES
Publicado:	Universidad de San Buenaventura 2011
Materias:	Equivalence classes functional classes partition equivalence-equivalence analogical reasoning children. Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5280e98ad15044d49927a52761ceda4f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5280e98ad15044d49927a52761ceda4f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5280e98ad15044d49927a52761ceda4f2021-11-25T02:23:46ZEffect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure10.21500/20112084.7882011-20842011-7922https://doaj.org/article/5280e98ad15044d49927a52761ceda4f2011-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/788https://doaj.org/toc/2011-2084https://doaj.org/toc/2011-7922Equivalence – Equivalence responding (Barnes et al., 1997), based on derived or non-explicitly trained relational responding, supports a behaviour-analytic model of analogical reasoning. Conditional discriminations are the most common procedure used to train its prerequisites. In this exploratory work we test Vaughan’s (1988) simple discrimination procedure instead to derive Eq-Eq responses in children. Two factors were assessed: type of reinforcer used (primary or secondary) and age of participants (9-10 or 12-13 years). The procedure successfully leaded to the derivation of equivalence – equivalence responses, and both factors influenced the results: selecting older children and applying primary reinforcement leaded to faster learning and better results in the equivalence – equivalence test. No interaction between factors was found. This training procedure can provide a new way to investigate the behavioural prerequisites of this important abilityAndres GarciaFatima Pérez GonzálezRocío Martín VeraMayte Gutiérrez DomínguezJesús Gómez BujedoVicente Pérez FernándezSantiago Benjumea RodriguezUniversidad de San BuenaventuraarticleEquivalence classesfunctional classespartitionequivalence-equivalenceanalogical reasoningchildren.PsychologyBF1-990ENESInternational Journal of Psychological Research, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2011)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ES
topic	Equivalence classes functional classes partition equivalence-equivalence analogical reasoning children. Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	Equivalence classes functional classes partition equivalence-equivalence analogical reasoning children. Psychology BF1-990 Andres Garcia Fatima Pérez González Rocío Martín Vera Mayte Gutiérrez Domínguez Jesús Gómez Bujedo Vicente Pérez Fernández Santiago Benjumea Rodriguez Effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure
description	Equivalence – Equivalence responding (Barnes et al., 1997), based on derived or non-explicitly trained relational responding, supports a behaviour-analytic model of analogical reasoning. Conditional discriminations are the most common procedure used to train its prerequisites. In this exploratory work we test Vaughan’s (1988) simple discrimination procedure instead to derive Eq-Eq responses in children. Two factors were assessed: type of reinforcer used (primary or secondary) and age of participants (9-10 or 12-13 years). The procedure successfully leaded to the derivation of equivalence – equivalence responses, and both factors influenced the results: selecting older children and applying primary reinforcement leaded to faster learning and better results in the equivalence – equivalence test. No interaction between factors was found. This training procedure can provide a new way to investigate the behavioural prerequisites of this important ability
format	article
author	Andres Garcia Fatima Pérez González Rocío Martín Vera Mayte Gutiérrez Domínguez Jesús Gómez Bujedo Vicente Pérez Fernández Santiago Benjumea Rodriguez
author_facet	Andres Garcia Fatima Pérez González Rocío Martín Vera Mayte Gutiérrez Domínguez Jesús Gómez Bujedo Vicente Pérez Fernández Santiago Benjumea Rodriguez
author_sort	Andres Garcia
title	Effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure
title_short	Effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure
title_full	Effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure
title_fullStr	Effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure
title_full_unstemmed	Effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure
title_sort	effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure
publisher	Universidad de San Buenaventura
publishDate	2011
url	https://doaj.org/article/5280e98ad15044d49927a52761ceda4f
work_keys_str_mv	AT andresgarcia effectofageandtypeofreinforcerintheequivalenceequivalencebyapartitionprocedure AT fatimaperezgonzalez effectofageandtypeofreinforcerintheequivalenceequivalencebyapartitionprocedure AT rociomartinvera effectofageandtypeofreinforcerintheequivalenceequivalencebyapartitionprocedure AT maytegutierrezdominguez effectofageandtypeofreinforcerintheequivalenceequivalencebyapartitionprocedure AT jesusgomezbujedo effectofageandtypeofreinforcerintheequivalenceequivalencebyapartitionprocedure AT vicenteperezfernandez effectofageandtypeofreinforcerintheequivalenceequivalencebyapartitionprocedure AT santiagobenjumearodriguez effectofageandtypeofreinforcerintheequivalenceequivalencebyapartitionprocedure
_version_	1718414635361632256

Effect of age and type of reinforcer in the equivalence – equivalence by a partition procedure

Ejemplares similares