Single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.

<h4>Background</h4>Gene activation is thought to occur through a series of temporally defined regulatory steps. However, this process has not been completely evaluated in single living mammalian cells.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>To investigate the timing and coordi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ilona U Rafalska-Metcalf, Sara Lawrence Powers, Lucy M Joo, Gary LeRoy, Susan M Janicki
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/528fe1c904134c8f9e7eff32eaf52241
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:528fe1c904134c8f9e7eff32eaf52241
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:528fe1c904134c8f9e7eff32eaf522412021-11-25T06:24:23ZSingle cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0010272https://doaj.org/article/528fe1c904134c8f9e7eff32eaf522412010-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20422051/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Gene activation is thought to occur through a series of temporally defined regulatory steps. However, this process has not been completely evaluated in single living mammalian cells.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>To investigate the timing and coordination of gene activation events, we tracked the recruitment of GCN5 (histone acetyltransferase), RNA polymerase II, Brd2 and Brd4 (acetyl-lysine binding proteins), in relation to a VP16-transcriptional activator, to a transcription site that can be visualized in single living cells. All accumulated rapidly with the VP16 activator as did the transcribed RNA. RNA was also detected at significantly more transcription sites in cells expressing the VP16-activator compared to a p53-activator. After alpha-amanitin pre-treatment, the VP16-activator, GCN5, and Brd2 are still recruited to the transcription site but the chromatin does not decondense.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>This study demonstrates that a strong activator can rapidly overcome the condensed chromatin structure of an inactive transcription site and supercede the expected requirement for regulatory events to proceed in a temporally defined order. Additionally, activator strength determines the number of cells in which transcription is induced as well as the extent of chromatin decondensation. As chromatin decondensation is significantly reduced after alpha-amanitin pre-treatment, despite the recruitment of transcriptional activation factors, this provides further evidence that transcription drives large-scale chromatin decondensation.Ilona U Rafalska-MetcalfSara Lawrence PowersLucy M JooGary LeRoySusan M JanickiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 5, Iss 4, p e10272 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ilona U Rafalska-Metcalf
Sara Lawrence Powers
Lucy M Joo
Gary LeRoy
Susan M Janicki
Single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.
description <h4>Background</h4>Gene activation is thought to occur through a series of temporally defined regulatory steps. However, this process has not been completely evaluated in single living mammalian cells.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>To investigate the timing and coordination of gene activation events, we tracked the recruitment of GCN5 (histone acetyltransferase), RNA polymerase II, Brd2 and Brd4 (acetyl-lysine binding proteins), in relation to a VP16-transcriptional activator, to a transcription site that can be visualized in single living cells. All accumulated rapidly with the VP16 activator as did the transcribed RNA. RNA was also detected at significantly more transcription sites in cells expressing the VP16-activator compared to a p53-activator. After alpha-amanitin pre-treatment, the VP16-activator, GCN5, and Brd2 are still recruited to the transcription site but the chromatin does not decondense.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>This study demonstrates that a strong activator can rapidly overcome the condensed chromatin structure of an inactive transcription site and supercede the expected requirement for regulatory events to proceed in a temporally defined order. Additionally, activator strength determines the number of cells in which transcription is induced as well as the extent of chromatin decondensation. As chromatin decondensation is significantly reduced after alpha-amanitin pre-treatment, despite the recruitment of transcriptional activation factors, this provides further evidence that transcription drives large-scale chromatin decondensation.
format article
author Ilona U Rafalska-Metcalf
Sara Lawrence Powers
Lucy M Joo
Gary LeRoy
Susan M Janicki
author_facet Ilona U Rafalska-Metcalf
Sara Lawrence Powers
Lucy M Joo
Gary LeRoy
Susan M Janicki
author_sort Ilona U Rafalska-Metcalf
title Single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.
title_short Single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.
title_full Single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.
title_fullStr Single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.
title_full_unstemmed Single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.
title_sort single cell analysis of transcriptional activation dynamics.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/528fe1c904134c8f9e7eff32eaf52241
work_keys_str_mv AT ilonaurafalskametcalf singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
AT saralawrencepowers singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
AT lucymjoo singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
AT garyleroy singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
AT susanmjanicki singlecellanalysisoftranscriptionalactivationdynamics
_version_ 1718413743440789504