Dogs as Therapeutic Partners, Not Therapeutic Tools: Ethical Considerations for AAT in the Correctional Setting

Although the benefits of animal assisted therapy for people are well established, the ethical considerations for the welfare and safety of the non-human animals involved are not. Without an accrediting body responsible for creating and overseeing national standards, therapy animal organizations are...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimberly Collica-Cox, George J. Day
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/52999c5d30d54c1480e8989527394a38
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:52999c5d30d54c1480e8989527394a38
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:52999c5d30d54c1480e8989527394a382021-11-25T18:59:49ZDogs as Therapeutic Partners, Not Therapeutic Tools: Ethical Considerations for AAT in the Correctional Setting10.3390/socsci101104322076-0760https://doaj.org/article/52999c5d30d54c1480e8989527394a382021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/11/432https://doaj.org/toc/2076-0760Although the benefits of animal assisted therapy for people are well established, the ethical considerations for the welfare and safety of the non-human animals involved are not. Without an accrediting body responsible for creating and overseeing national standards, therapy animal organizations are forced to create their own guidelines, creating inconsistencies within the field. Based on interviews conducted with therapy teams who have worked with Parenting, Prison & Pups (PPP), a parenting program provided to incarcerated jailed women that is integrated with the use of animal-assisted therapy (AAT), this article explores the extent of ethics training offered for AAT teams and will examine how agencies and handlers promote and ensure the safety of canine partners, especially in a correctional setting. The research suggests that specific protocols put forth by individual AAT organizations, which can provide for a national model, can afford for the safety and comfortability of canine partners, especially in a corrections environment, but implies that in order to maintain consistency and increase therapy team professionalism, national standards are a necessity. Guidelines are specifically essential for mental health professionals, who lack guidelines from their own accrediting bodies’ code of ethics, and may incorporate non-human therapy partners into their work settings, without proper supervision.Kimberly Collica-CoxGeorge J. DayMDPI AGarticleanimal-assisted therapycorrectionsprogramsparentingethicsnon-human animal welfare and protectionSocial SciencesHENSocial Sciences, Vol 10, Iss 432, p 432 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic animal-assisted therapy
corrections
programs
parenting
ethics
non-human animal welfare and protection
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle animal-assisted therapy
corrections
programs
parenting
ethics
non-human animal welfare and protection
Social Sciences
H
Kimberly Collica-Cox
George J. Day
Dogs as Therapeutic Partners, Not Therapeutic Tools: Ethical Considerations for AAT in the Correctional Setting
description Although the benefits of animal assisted therapy for people are well established, the ethical considerations for the welfare and safety of the non-human animals involved are not. Without an accrediting body responsible for creating and overseeing national standards, therapy animal organizations are forced to create their own guidelines, creating inconsistencies within the field. Based on interviews conducted with therapy teams who have worked with Parenting, Prison & Pups (PPP), a parenting program provided to incarcerated jailed women that is integrated with the use of animal-assisted therapy (AAT), this article explores the extent of ethics training offered for AAT teams and will examine how agencies and handlers promote and ensure the safety of canine partners, especially in a correctional setting. The research suggests that specific protocols put forth by individual AAT organizations, which can provide for a national model, can afford for the safety and comfortability of canine partners, especially in a corrections environment, but implies that in order to maintain consistency and increase therapy team professionalism, national standards are a necessity. Guidelines are specifically essential for mental health professionals, who lack guidelines from their own accrediting bodies’ code of ethics, and may incorporate non-human therapy partners into their work settings, without proper supervision.
format article
author Kimberly Collica-Cox
George J. Day
author_facet Kimberly Collica-Cox
George J. Day
author_sort Kimberly Collica-Cox
title Dogs as Therapeutic Partners, Not Therapeutic Tools: Ethical Considerations for AAT in the Correctional Setting
title_short Dogs as Therapeutic Partners, Not Therapeutic Tools: Ethical Considerations for AAT in the Correctional Setting
title_full Dogs as Therapeutic Partners, Not Therapeutic Tools: Ethical Considerations for AAT in the Correctional Setting
title_fullStr Dogs as Therapeutic Partners, Not Therapeutic Tools: Ethical Considerations for AAT in the Correctional Setting
title_full_unstemmed Dogs as Therapeutic Partners, Not Therapeutic Tools: Ethical Considerations for AAT in the Correctional Setting
title_sort dogs as therapeutic partners, not therapeutic tools: ethical considerations for aat in the correctional setting
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/52999c5d30d54c1480e8989527394a38
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlycollicacox dogsastherapeuticpartnersnottherapeutictoolsethicalconsiderationsforaatinthecorrectionalsetting
AT georgejday dogsastherapeuticpartnersnottherapeutictoolsethicalconsiderationsforaatinthecorrectionalsetting
_version_ 1718410462237818880