Clinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study

Abstract Background Night-time BP, especially non-dipper, is a stronger predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a gold standard for the detection of non-dippers but it often is unavailable and expensive. This study aims to determine clinical risk...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chavalit Chotruangnapa, Titima Tansakun, Weranuj Roubsanthisuk
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/529a4f1e8bb34f72bff31b4ca90e7135
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:529a4f1e8bb34f72bff31b4ca90e7135
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:529a4f1e8bb34f72bff31b4ca90e71352021-11-21T12:33:15ZClinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study10.1186/s40885-021-00180-42056-5909https://doaj.org/article/529a4f1e8bb34f72bff31b4ca90e71352021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-021-00180-4https://doaj.org/toc/2056-5909Abstract Background Night-time BP, especially non-dipper, is a stronger predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a gold standard for the detection of non-dippers but it often is unavailable and expensive. This study aims to determine clinical risk factors that predict non-dipper. Methods An exploratory traditional case-control study, exclusive sampling of control was conducted from January 2013 to September 2018 to explore clinical risk factors associated with non-dippers in hypertensive patients. Subgroup analysis was performed in each treated and untreated hypertensive patient. The parsimonious predictive score for non-dippers was constructed. Results The study included 208 hypertensive patients receiving 24 h ABPM. There were 104 dippers and 104 non-dippers. Significant clinical risk factors associated with non-dippers were the age of > 65 years, average office diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and fasting plasma glucose of > 5.6 mmol/L. Results of subgroup analysis showed that dyslipidemia, history of coronary artery disease, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and direct vasodilators, average office DBP, and serum uric acid were associated with non-dippers in treated hypertensive patients, however, there were no risk factors associated with non-dippers in the untreated group. The predictive score for non-dippers in treated group included average office DBP, dyslipidemia, serum uric acid, male, calcium channel blockers and ACEIs use. The area under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AuROC) was 0.723. A cut-off point which was > 0.0701 and prevalence of non-dippers of 46%, this score had a sensitivity of 77.4%, specificity of 65.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 66.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.6%. For untreated group, age, hemoglobin and body mass index were included in the predictive model. AuROC was 0.74. There was a sensitivity of 51.9%, specificity of 91.2%, PPV of 82.4%, and NPV of 70.5% at the cut-off point of > 0.357, and prevalence of 44%. Conclusion There were several significant clinical risk factors associated with non-dippers in treated hypertensive patients. The predictive score might be useful for the detection of non-dippers; however, it cannot replace ABPM.Chavalit ChotruangnapaTitima TansakunWeranuj RoubsanthisukBMCarticleHypertensionNon-dippersRisk factorsBlood pressure monitoringAmbulatoryMedicineRInternal medicineRC31-1245ENClinical Hypertension, Vol 27, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Hypertension
Non-dippers
Risk factors
Blood pressure monitoring
Ambulatory
Medicine
R
Internal medicine
RC31-1245
spellingShingle Hypertension
Non-dippers
Risk factors
Blood pressure monitoring
Ambulatory
Medicine
R
Internal medicine
RC31-1245
Chavalit Chotruangnapa
Titima Tansakun
Weranuj Roubsanthisuk
Clinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study
description Abstract Background Night-time BP, especially non-dipper, is a stronger predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a gold standard for the detection of non-dippers but it often is unavailable and expensive. This study aims to determine clinical risk factors that predict non-dipper. Methods An exploratory traditional case-control study, exclusive sampling of control was conducted from January 2013 to September 2018 to explore clinical risk factors associated with non-dippers in hypertensive patients. Subgroup analysis was performed in each treated and untreated hypertensive patient. The parsimonious predictive score for non-dippers was constructed. Results The study included 208 hypertensive patients receiving 24 h ABPM. There were 104 dippers and 104 non-dippers. Significant clinical risk factors associated with non-dippers were the age of > 65 years, average office diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and fasting plasma glucose of > 5.6 mmol/L. Results of subgroup analysis showed that dyslipidemia, history of coronary artery disease, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and direct vasodilators, average office DBP, and serum uric acid were associated with non-dippers in treated hypertensive patients, however, there were no risk factors associated with non-dippers in the untreated group. The predictive score for non-dippers in treated group included average office DBP, dyslipidemia, serum uric acid, male, calcium channel blockers and ACEIs use. The area under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AuROC) was 0.723. A cut-off point which was > 0.0701 and prevalence of non-dippers of 46%, this score had a sensitivity of 77.4%, specificity of 65.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 66.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.6%. For untreated group, age, hemoglobin and body mass index were included in the predictive model. AuROC was 0.74. There was a sensitivity of 51.9%, specificity of 91.2%, PPV of 82.4%, and NPV of 70.5% at the cut-off point of > 0.357, and prevalence of 44%. Conclusion There were several significant clinical risk factors associated with non-dippers in treated hypertensive patients. The predictive score might be useful for the detection of non-dippers; however, it cannot replace ABPM.
format article
author Chavalit Chotruangnapa
Titima Tansakun
Weranuj Roubsanthisuk
author_facet Chavalit Chotruangnapa
Titima Tansakun
Weranuj Roubsanthisuk
author_sort Chavalit Chotruangnapa
title Clinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study
title_short Clinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study
title_full Clinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study
title_fullStr Clinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study
title_sort clinical risk factors and predictive score for the non-dipper profile in hypertensive patients: a case-control study
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/529a4f1e8bb34f72bff31b4ca90e7135
work_keys_str_mv AT chavalitchotruangnapa clinicalriskfactorsandpredictivescoreforthenondipperprofileinhypertensivepatientsacasecontrolstudy
AT titimatansakun clinicalriskfactorsandpredictivescoreforthenondipperprofileinhypertensivepatientsacasecontrolstudy
AT weranujroubsanthisuk clinicalriskfactorsandpredictivescoreforthenondipperprofileinhypertensivepatientsacasecontrolstudy
_version_ 1718418941764698112