THE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES

The aim of this study is to identify the status of science teacher candidates, over problem, hypotheses and model determination steps of scientific method. In this regard, 39 teacher candidates from the 3rd grade of science teaching department were interviewed. In this study which is formed by descr...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Elif BENZER
Format:	article
Language:	DE EN FR TR
Published:	Fırat University 2019
Subjects:	scientific research methods science education preservice science teacher Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Online Access:	https://doaj.org/article/52d288a221f64d11aaa1a8b2451340ab
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:52d288a221f64d11aaa1a8b2451340ab
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:52d288a221f64d11aaa1a8b2451340ab2021-11-24T09:20:48ZTHE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES2148-416310.9761/JASSS3398https://doaj.org/article/52d288a221f64d11aaa1a8b2451340ab2019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=1205640881_24-Dr.%20Elif%20BENZER.pdf&key=27843https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163The aim of this study is to identify the status of science teacher candidates, over problem, hypotheses and model determination steps of scientific method. In this regard, 39 teacher candidates from the 3rd grade of science teaching department were interviewed. In this study which is formed by descriptive pattern, first, the teachers were let to be grouped in their desire, and ended up in nine different groups. These groups then tried to write problem and hypotheses sentences and form a model for the nine sample events they have been dealt. Once the requested inputs are done, each group, while delivering its own sample event to the next one, also tried to correct and rewrite and approve the problem, hypotheses and model which was delivered to them by the previous group. This cycle lasted in seven minute intervals, until each group received back the paper that they originally wrote. With this method, it's been possible to see if there were any errors or short comings of information for each group. Thus, an active learning environment in which the teacher candidates tried to find the corrections while evaluating other groups, has been set. The answers of the groups have also been evaluated in regard to the frequency and percentage regarding them being right or wrong according to each participating group. The result of this study, it's been found out that the teacher candidates were successful in determining problem, hypotheses and models in events created as a correlational study; however, they made errors in determining problem, hypotheses and models in causal comparison, survey and experimental research designs.Elif BENZERFırat Universityarticlescientific research methodsscience educationpreservice science teacherSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 9, Iss 53, Pp 335-344 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	scientific research methods science education preservice science teacher Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	scientific research methods science education preservice science teacher Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Elif BENZER THE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES
description	The aim of this study is to identify the status of science teacher candidates, over problem, hypotheses and model determination steps of scientific method. In this regard, 39 teacher candidates from the 3rd grade of science teaching department were interviewed. In this study which is formed by descriptive pattern, first, the teachers were let to be grouped in their desire, and ended up in nine different groups. These groups then tried to write problem and hypotheses sentences and form a model for the nine sample events they have been dealt. Once the requested inputs are done, each group, while delivering its own sample event to the next one, also tried to correct and rewrite and approve the problem, hypotheses and model which was delivered to them by the previous group. This cycle lasted in seven minute intervals, until each group received back the paper that they originally wrote. With this method, it's been possible to see if there were any errors or short comings of information for each group. Thus, an active learning environment in which the teacher candidates tried to find the corrections while evaluating other groups, has been set. The answers of the groups have also been evaluated in regard to the frequency and percentage regarding them being right or wrong according to each participating group. The result of this study, it's been found out that the teacher candidates were successful in determining problem, hypotheses and models in events created as a correlational study; however, they made errors in determining problem, hypotheses and models in causal comparison, survey and experimental research designs.
format	article
author	Elif BENZER
author_facet	Elif BENZER
author_sort	Elif BENZER
title	THE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES
title_short	THE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES
title_full	THE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES
title_fullStr	THE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES
title_full_unstemmed	THE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES
title_sort	evaluation of science teacher candidates' status of problem, hypotheses and model reporting in scientific researches
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/52d288a221f64d11aaa1a8b2451340ab
work_keys_str_mv	AT elifbenzer theevaluationofscienceteachercandidatesstatusofproblemhypothesesandmodelreportinginscientificresearches AT elifbenzer evaluationofscienceteachercandidatesstatusofproblemhypothesesandmodelreportinginscientificresearches
_version_	1718415543856267264

THE EVALUATION OF SCIENCE TEACHER CANDIDATES' STATUS OF PROBLEM, HYPOTHESES AND MODEL REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES

Similar Items