Value of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control
Objective: To assess the value of ultrasound images and reports scoring system for quality control in clinical ultrasound practice. Methods: Ultrasound images and reports scoring system was established and implemented in the Department of Medical Ultrasound at West China Hospital of Sichuan Universi...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/52e7ff3fda074dc69737700dcdd3bf2b |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:52e7ff3fda074dc69737700dcdd3bf2b |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:52e7ff3fda074dc69737700dcdd3bf2b2021-11-05T08:34:43ZValue of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control2576-251610.37015/AUDT.2021.210003https://doaj.org/article/52e7ff3fda074dc69737700dcdd3bf2b2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.journaladvancedultrasound.com:81/fileup/2576-2516/PDF/1630472702804-756439363.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2576-2516Objective: To assess the value of ultrasound images and reports scoring system for quality control in clinical ultrasound practice. Methods: Ultrasound images and reports scoring system was established and implemented in the Department of Medical Ultrasound at West China Hospital of Sichuan University in 2014. The scoring system along with formulated corresponding management measures was used for quality control of ultrasound examination and clinical practice assessment. The quantitative scoring results were summarized and analyzed. Results: Through the quantitative assessment of the quality of the images and reports of ultrasound examinations, the total report score in our department had risen from 4.93 in 2014 to 4.98 in 2018. “Inconsistency between description and conclusion” accounted for 46.47% of all report errors, which was the most common report error. The total image score also increased slightly to ≥ 4.98 during the past three years. The most common image error was “not saving color Doppler images”, which accounted for 84.48% of all image errors. The total score of images was higher than that of text reports. Conclusion: It is important to establish the ultrasound images and reports scoring system for quality control of ultrasound practice. Using quantitative scores for ultrasound images and reports can improve the quality control of ultrasound examination and strengthen the management of clinical operation.Li Qiu, MD, Yulan Peng, MD, Qiang Lu, MD, Yan Luo, MDEditorial Office of Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapyarticle|ultrasound|image|report|quality control|clinical managementMedical technologyR855-855.5MedicineRENAdvanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 245-248 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
|ultrasound|image|report|quality control|clinical management Medical technology R855-855.5 Medicine R |
| spellingShingle |
|ultrasound|image|report|quality control|clinical management Medical technology R855-855.5 Medicine R Li Qiu, MD, Yulan Peng, MD, Qiang Lu, MD, Yan Luo, MD Value of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control |
| description |
Objective: To assess the value of ultrasound images and reports scoring system for quality control in clinical ultrasound practice. Methods: Ultrasound images and reports scoring system was established and implemented in the Department of Medical Ultrasound at West China Hospital of Sichuan University in 2014. The scoring system along with formulated corresponding management measures was used for quality control of ultrasound examination and clinical practice assessment. The quantitative scoring results were summarized and analyzed. Results: Through the quantitative assessment of the quality of the images and reports of ultrasound examinations, the total report score in our department had risen from 4.93 in 2014 to 4.98 in 2018. “Inconsistency between description and conclusion” accounted for 46.47% of all report errors, which was the most common report error. The total image score also increased slightly to ≥ 4.98 during the past three years. The most common image error was “not saving color Doppler images”, which accounted for 84.48% of all image errors. The total score of images was higher than that of text reports. Conclusion: It is important to establish the ultrasound images and reports scoring system for quality control of ultrasound practice. Using quantitative scores for ultrasound images and reports can improve the quality control of ultrasound examination and strengthen the management of clinical operation. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Li Qiu, MD, Yulan Peng, MD, Qiang Lu, MD, Yan Luo, MD |
| author_facet |
Li Qiu, MD, Yulan Peng, MD, Qiang Lu, MD, Yan Luo, MD |
| author_sort |
Li Qiu, MD, Yulan Peng, MD, Qiang Lu, MD, Yan Luo, MD |
| title |
Value of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control |
| title_short |
Value of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control |
| title_full |
Value of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control |
| title_fullStr |
Value of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Value of Ultrasound Images and Reports Scoring System in Quality Control |
| title_sort |
value of ultrasound images and reports scoring system in quality control |
| publisher |
Editorial Office of Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/52e7ff3fda074dc69737700dcdd3bf2b |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT liqiumdyulanpengmdqianglumdyanluomd valueofultrasoundimagesandreportsscoringsysteminqualitycontrol |
| _version_ |
1718444468217053184 |