Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics.
<h4>Aim</h4>How reduced femoral neck anteversion alters the distribution of pressure and contact area in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe the biomechanical implication of different femoral neck version angles on...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/52f317e522ee4de88a5914b63c9c7c00 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:52f317e522ee4de88a5914b63c9c7c00 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:52f317e522ee4de88a5914b63c9c7c002021-12-02T20:11:14ZComputational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0252435https://doaj.org/article/52f317e522ee4de88a5914b63c9c7c002021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252435https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Aim</h4>How reduced femoral neck anteversion alters the distribution of pressure and contact area in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe the biomechanical implication of different femoral neck version angles on HRA using a finite element analysis.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A total of sixty models were constructed to assess the effect of different femoral neck version angles on three different functional loads: 0°of hip flexion, 45°of hip flexion, and 90° of hip flexion. Femoral version was varied between 30° of anteversion to 30° of retroversion. All models were tested with the acetabular cup in four different positions: (1) 40°/15° (inclination/version), (2) 40°/25°, (3) 50°/15°, and (4) 50°/25°. Differences in range of motion due to presence of impingement, joint contact pressure, and joint contact area with different femoral versions and acetabular cup positions were calculated.<h4>Results</h4>Impingement was found to be most significant with the femur in 30° of retroversion, regardless of acetabular cup position. Anterior hip impingement occurred earlier during hip flexion as the femur was progressively retroverted. Impingement was reduced in all models by increasing acetabular cup inclination and anteversion, yet this consequentially led to higher contact pressures. At 90° of hip flexion, contact pressures and contact areas were inversely related and showed most notable change with 30° of femoral retroversion. In this model, the contact area migrated towards the anterior implant-bone interface along the femoral neck.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Femoral retroversion in HRA influences impingement and increases joint contact pressure most when the hip is loaded in flexion. Increasing acetabular inclination decreases the area of impingement but doing so causes a reciprocal increase in joint contact pressure. It may be advisable to study femoral neck version pre-operatively to better choose hip resurfacing arthroplasty candidates.Jonathan Bourget-MurrayAshish TanejaSadegh NaserkhakiMarwan El-RichSamer AdeebJames PowellKelly JohnstonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0252435 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
| spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Jonathan Bourget-Murray Ashish Taneja Sadegh Naserkhaki Marwan El-Rich Samer Adeeb James Powell Kelly Johnston Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. |
| description |
<h4>Aim</h4>How reduced femoral neck anteversion alters the distribution of pressure and contact area in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe the biomechanical implication of different femoral neck version angles on HRA using a finite element analysis.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A total of sixty models were constructed to assess the effect of different femoral neck version angles on three different functional loads: 0°of hip flexion, 45°of hip flexion, and 90° of hip flexion. Femoral version was varied between 30° of anteversion to 30° of retroversion. All models were tested with the acetabular cup in four different positions: (1) 40°/15° (inclination/version), (2) 40°/25°, (3) 50°/15°, and (4) 50°/25°. Differences in range of motion due to presence of impingement, joint contact pressure, and joint contact area with different femoral versions and acetabular cup positions were calculated.<h4>Results</h4>Impingement was found to be most significant with the femur in 30° of retroversion, regardless of acetabular cup position. Anterior hip impingement occurred earlier during hip flexion as the femur was progressively retroverted. Impingement was reduced in all models by increasing acetabular cup inclination and anteversion, yet this consequentially led to higher contact pressures. At 90° of hip flexion, contact pressures and contact areas were inversely related and showed most notable change with 30° of femoral retroversion. In this model, the contact area migrated towards the anterior implant-bone interface along the femoral neck.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Femoral retroversion in HRA influences impingement and increases joint contact pressure most when the hip is loaded in flexion. Increasing acetabular inclination decreases the area of impingement but doing so causes a reciprocal increase in joint contact pressure. It may be advisable to study femoral neck version pre-operatively to better choose hip resurfacing arthroplasty candidates. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Jonathan Bourget-Murray Ashish Taneja Sadegh Naserkhaki Marwan El-Rich Samer Adeeb James Powell Kelly Johnston |
| author_facet |
Jonathan Bourget-Murray Ashish Taneja Sadegh Naserkhaki Marwan El-Rich Samer Adeeb James Powell Kelly Johnston |
| author_sort |
Jonathan Bourget-Murray |
| title |
Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. |
| title_short |
Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. |
| title_full |
Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. |
| title_fullStr |
Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. |
| title_sort |
computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. |
| publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/52f317e522ee4de88a5914b63c9c7c00 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT jonathanbourgetmurray computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics AT ashishtaneja computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics AT sadeghnaserkhaki computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics AT marwanelrich computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics AT sameradeeb computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics AT jamespowell computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics AT kellyjohnston computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics |
| _version_ |
1718374885370101760 |