“Point of View” in Literary Criticism, History and History of Philosophy: Perspective of Dialogue

The problem of the point of view is considered, taking into account the vector of continuity from literary studies through history to the history of philosophy. The traditional approaches of the Anglo-American (G. James, P. Lubbock) and French (G. Genette) literary traditions are analyzed. The main...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: O. A. Vlasova
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/531e7bb07d2c43bda36259a4f9d43d12
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:531e7bb07d2c43bda36259a4f9d43d12
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:531e7bb07d2c43bda36259a4f9d43d122021-12-02T07:58:12Z“Point of View” in Literary Criticism, History and History of Philosophy: Perspective of Dialogue2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2020-11-193-210https://doaj.org/article/531e7bb07d2c43bda36259a4f9d43d122020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/2149https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The problem of the point of view is considered, taking into account the vector of continuity from literary studies through history to the history of philosophy. The traditional approaches of the Anglo-American (G. James, P. Lubbock) and French (G. Genette) literary traditions are analyzed. The main terminology and methodological strategies that can be used in historical and historical-philosophical science are highlighted. It is demonstrated that within the framework of history, the terminology of focalization contributes to the accentuation of the figure of the researcher, who sets the conditions for the perception of historical material. Based on a critical analysis of the models of focalization proposed by A. Munslow in history, the main directions of rethinking the problem of  focalization in historical and historical-philosophical practice are determined. The specificity of posing the problem of point of view and focalization in the history of philosophy is characterized. It is emphasized that turning to it allows us to pose the problem of the relationship between history and modernity, history and philosophy. Such problematization of historical and philosophical practice is much more successful than traditional terminology, contributing to the comprehension of modern development trends. The study of the problem of point of view demonstrates the commonality of the methodological problems of the humanities (literary criticism, history, history of philosophy) and the need for a general humanitarian dialogue.O. A. VlasovaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleliterary criticismhistoryhistory of philosophyhistorian of philosophyperspectivepoint of viewfocalizationliterary criticism of the xx centurynew criticismSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 1, Iss 11, Pp 193-210 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic literary criticism
history
history of philosophy
historian of philosophy
perspective
point of view
focalization
literary criticism of the xx century
new criticism
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
spellingShingle literary criticism
history
history of philosophy
historian of philosophy
perspective
point of view
focalization
literary criticism of the xx century
new criticism
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
O. A. Vlasova
“Point of View” in Literary Criticism, History and History of Philosophy: Perspective of Dialogue
description The problem of the point of view is considered, taking into account the vector of continuity from literary studies through history to the history of philosophy. The traditional approaches of the Anglo-American (G. James, P. Lubbock) and French (G. Genette) literary traditions are analyzed. The main terminology and methodological strategies that can be used in historical and historical-philosophical science are highlighted. It is demonstrated that within the framework of history, the terminology of focalization contributes to the accentuation of the figure of the researcher, who sets the conditions for the perception of historical material. Based on a critical analysis of the models of focalization proposed by A. Munslow in history, the main directions of rethinking the problem of  focalization in historical and historical-philosophical practice are determined. The specificity of posing the problem of point of view and focalization in the history of philosophy is characterized. It is emphasized that turning to it allows us to pose the problem of the relationship between history and modernity, history and philosophy. Such problematization of historical and philosophical practice is much more successful than traditional terminology, contributing to the comprehension of modern development trends. The study of the problem of point of view demonstrates the commonality of the methodological problems of the humanities (literary criticism, history, history of philosophy) and the need for a general humanitarian dialogue.
format article
author O. A. Vlasova
author_facet O. A. Vlasova
author_sort O. A. Vlasova
title “Point of View” in Literary Criticism, History and History of Philosophy: Perspective of Dialogue
title_short “Point of View” in Literary Criticism, History and History of Philosophy: Perspective of Dialogue
title_full “Point of View” in Literary Criticism, History and History of Philosophy: Perspective of Dialogue
title_fullStr “Point of View” in Literary Criticism, History and History of Philosophy: Perspective of Dialogue
title_full_unstemmed “Point of View” in Literary Criticism, History and History of Philosophy: Perspective of Dialogue
title_sort “point of view” in literary criticism, history and history of philosophy: perspective of dialogue
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/531e7bb07d2c43bda36259a4f9d43d12
work_keys_str_mv AT oavlasova pointofviewinliterarycriticismhistoryandhistoryofphilosophyperspectiveofdialogue
_version_ 1718398786025291776