How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?

The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lison Bouhours, Anaëlle Camarda, Monique Ernst, Anaïs Osmont, Grégoire Borst, Mathieu Cassotti
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac2021-12-02T20:13:57ZHow does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257753https://doaj.org/article/534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257753https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or an alone condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an expert (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the alone condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an expert (Experience 2) facilitated Hot but not cool inhibitory control. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on Hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on Hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals.Lison BouhoursAnaëlle CamardaMonique ErnstAnaïs OsmontGrégoire BorstMathieu CassottiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257753 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Lison Bouhours
Anaëlle Camarda
Monique Ernst
Anaïs Osmont
Grégoire Borst
Mathieu Cassotti
How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
description The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or an alone condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an expert (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the alone condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an expert (Experience 2) facilitated Hot but not cool inhibitory control. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on Hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on Hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals.
format article
author Lison Bouhours
Anaëlle Camarda
Monique Ernst
Anaïs Osmont
Grégoire Borst
Mathieu Cassotti
author_facet Lison Bouhours
Anaëlle Camarda
Monique Ernst
Anaïs Osmont
Grégoire Borst
Mathieu Cassotti
author_sort Lison Bouhours
title How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
title_short How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
title_full How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
title_fullStr How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
title_full_unstemmed How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
title_sort how does social evaluation influence hot and cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac
work_keys_str_mv AT lisonbouhours howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence
AT anaellecamarda howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence
AT moniqueernst howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence
AT anaisosmont howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence
AT gregoireborst howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence
AT mathieucassotti howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence
_version_ 1718374703238742016