How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?
The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac2021-12-02T20:13:57ZHow does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257753https://doaj.org/article/534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257753https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or an alone condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an expert (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the alone condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an expert (Experience 2) facilitated Hot but not cool inhibitory control. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on Hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on Hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals.Lison BouhoursAnaëlle CamardaMonique ErnstAnaïs OsmontGrégoire BorstMathieu CassottiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257753 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Lison Bouhours Anaëlle Camarda Monique Ernst Anaïs Osmont Grégoire Borst Mathieu Cassotti How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence? |
description |
The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or an alone condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an expert (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the alone condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an expert (Experience 2) facilitated Hot but not cool inhibitory control. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on Hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on Hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals. |
format |
article |
author |
Lison Bouhours Anaëlle Camarda Monique Ernst Anaïs Osmont Grégoire Borst Mathieu Cassotti |
author_facet |
Lison Bouhours Anaëlle Camarda Monique Ernst Anaïs Osmont Grégoire Borst Mathieu Cassotti |
author_sort |
Lison Bouhours |
title |
How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence? |
title_short |
How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence? |
title_full |
How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence? |
title_fullStr |
How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence? |
title_sort |
how does social evaluation influence hot and cool inhibitory control in adolescence? |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/534e2d3325c2436c83e467948fc09dac |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lisonbouhours howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence AT anaellecamarda howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence AT moniqueernst howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence AT anaisosmont howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence AT gregoireborst howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence AT mathieucassotti howdoessocialevaluationinfluencehotandcoolinhibitorycontrolinadolescence |
_version_ |
1718374703238742016 |