A Global Rating Scale and Checklist Instrument for Pediatric Laceration Repair
Introduction Laceration repair is a core procedural skill in which pediatric residents are expected to attain proficiency per the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Restricted trainee work hours have decreased clinical opportunities for laceration repair, and simulation may be a m...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Association of American Medical Colleges
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/537dafa92f9f412c8a7f5db542376cef |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Introduction Laceration repair is a core procedural skill in which pediatric residents are expected to attain proficiency per the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Restricted trainee work hours have decreased clinical opportunities for laceration repair, and simulation may be a modality to fill that clinical gap. There is a therefore a need for objective measures of pediatric resident competence in laceration repair. Methods We created a global rating scale and checklist to assess laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department. We adapted the global rating scale from the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills tool used to evaluate surgical residents' technical skills and adapted the checklist from a mastery training checklist related to infant lumbar puncture. We tested both tools in the pediatric emergency department. Eight supervising physicians used the tools to evaluate 30 residents' technical skills in laceration repair. We performed validation testing of both tools in the simulation environment. Based on formal evaluation, we developed a video to train future evaluators on the use of the global rating scale. Results The global rating scale and checklist showed fair concordance across reviewers. Both tools received positive feedback from supervising physicians who used them. Discussion We found that the global rating scale and checklist are more applicable to formative, rather than summative, training for resident laceration repair. We recommend using these educational tools with trainees in the simulation environment prior to trainees performing laceration repairs on actual patients. |
|---|