Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities

Empirically, it is widely discussed in “Cross” modalities that the pacing strategy developed by an athlete or trainee has a significant impact on the endurance performance in a WOD in the AMRAP, EMOM, or FOR TIME model. We can observe at least six pacing strategies adopted during the cyclical modali...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Levy Anthony de-Oliveira, Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar, José Luis Maté-Muñoz, Juan Manuel García-Manso, José Carlos Aragão-Santos, Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	strength endurance cross training pacing functional fitness health Sports GV557-1198.995
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/53859516e63c444283eb748d743ba68b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:53859516e63c444283eb748d743ba68b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:53859516e63c444283eb748d743ba68b2021-11-25T19:00:00ZAnalysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities10.3390/sports91101442075-4663https://doaj.org/article/53859516e63c444283eb748d743ba68b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/9/11/144https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4663Empirically, it is widely discussed in “Cross” modalities that the pacing strategy developed by an athlete or trainee has a significant impact on the endurance performance in a WOD in the AMRAP, EMOM, or FOR TIME model. We can observe at least six pacing strategies adopted during the cyclical modalities in the endurance performance in the scientific literature. However, besides these modalities, exercises of acyclical modalities of weightlifting and gymnastics are performed in the “Cross” modalities. These exercises may not allow the same pacing strategies adopted during cyclic modalities’ movements due to their motor characteristics and different intensity and level of effort imposed to perform the motor gesture. In addition to the intensity and level of effort that are generally unknown to the coach and athlete of the “Cross” modalities, another factor that can influence the adoption of a pacing strategy during a WOD in the AMRAP, EMOM, or FOR TIME model is the task endpoint knowledge, which varies according to the training model used. Thus, our objective was to evaluate situations in which these factors can influence the pacing strategies adopted in a self-regulated task with cyclic and acyclic modalities movements during an endurance workout in the AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME model. Given the scarcity of studies in the scientific literature and the increasing discussion of this topic within the “Cross” modalities, this manuscript can help scientists and coaches better orient their research problems or training programs and analyze and interpret new findings more accurately.Levy Anthony de-OliveiraJuan Ramón Heredia-ElvarJosé Luis Maté-MuñozJuan Manuel García-MansoJosé Carlos Aragão-SantosMarzo Edir Da Silva-GrigolettoMDPI AGarticlestrengthendurancecross trainingpacingfunctional fitnesshealthSportsGV557-1198.995ENSports, Vol 9, Iss 144, p 144 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	strength endurance cross training pacing functional fitness health Sports GV557-1198.995
spellingShingle	strength endurance cross training pacing functional fitness health Sports GV557-1198.995 Levy Anthony de-Oliveira Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar José Luis Maté-Muñoz Juan Manuel García-Manso José Carlos Aragão-Santos Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities
description	Empirically, it is widely discussed in “Cross” modalities that the pacing strategy developed by an athlete or trainee has a significant impact on the endurance performance in a WOD in the AMRAP, EMOM, or FOR TIME model. We can observe at least six pacing strategies adopted during the cyclical modalities in the endurance performance in the scientific literature. However, besides these modalities, exercises of acyclical modalities of weightlifting and gymnastics are performed in the “Cross” modalities. These exercises may not allow the same pacing strategies adopted during cyclic modalities’ movements due to their motor characteristics and different intensity and level of effort imposed to perform the motor gesture. In addition to the intensity and level of effort that are generally unknown to the coach and athlete of the “Cross” modalities, another factor that can influence the adoption of a pacing strategy during a WOD in the AMRAP, EMOM, or FOR TIME model is the task endpoint knowledge, which varies according to the training model used. Thus, our objective was to evaluate situations in which these factors can influence the pacing strategies adopted in a self-regulated task with cyclic and acyclic modalities movements during an endurance workout in the AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME model. Given the scarcity of studies in the scientific literature and the increasing discussion of this topic within the “Cross” modalities, this manuscript can help scientists and coaches better orient their research problems or training programs and analyze and interpret new findings more accurately.
format	article
author	Levy Anthony de-Oliveira Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar José Luis Maté-Muñoz Juan Manuel García-Manso José Carlos Aragão-Santos Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
author_facet	Levy Anthony de-Oliveira Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar José Luis Maté-Muñoz Juan Manuel García-Manso José Carlos Aragão-Santos Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
author_sort	Levy Anthony de-Oliveira
title	Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities
title_short	Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities
title_full	Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities
title_fullStr	Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities
title_full_unstemmed	Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities
title_sort	analysis of pacing strategies in amrap, emom, and for time training models during “cross” modalities
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/53859516e63c444283eb748d743ba68b
work_keys_str_mv	AT levyanthonydeoliveira analysisofpacingstrategiesinamrapemomandfortimetrainingmodelsduringcrossmodalities AT juanramonherediaelvar analysisofpacingstrategiesinamrapemomandfortimetrainingmodelsduringcrossmodalities AT joseluismatemunoz analysisofpacingstrategiesinamrapemomandfortimetrainingmodelsduringcrossmodalities AT juanmanuelgarciamanso analysisofpacingstrategiesinamrapemomandfortimetrainingmodelsduringcrossmodalities AT josecarlosaragaosantos analysisofpacingstrategiesinamrapemomandfortimetrainingmodelsduringcrossmodalities AT marzoedirdasilvagrigoletto analysisofpacingstrategiesinamrapemomandfortimetrainingmodelsduringcrossmodalities
_version_	1718410401915338752

Analysis of Pacing Strategies in AMRAP, EMOM, and FOR TIME Training Models during “Cross” Modalities

Ejemplares similares