THE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT

In the article the author analyses how the largest battle of the Great Patriotic War and the second World War, the Battle of Kursk, is shown in the west historiography: the intentions of the opposite sides, the degree of preparation to the coming battle, the correlation between number of people and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	A. A. Paderin
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2013
Materias:	spain iberia iberians celts celtiberians phoenicians greeks indo-european tribes basques tartess gades carthago rome atlantis nationalism separatism regionalism basque country catalonia andalusia International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/53a75014ed854adc9ecc50c2779060be
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:53a75014ed854adc9ecc50c2779060be
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:53a75014ed854adc9ecc50c2779060be2021-11-23T14:50:54ZTHE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2013-5-32-90-99https://doaj.org/article/53a75014ed854adc9ecc50c2779060be2013-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1212https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099In the article the author analyses how the largest battle of the Great Patriotic War and the second World War, the Battle of Kursk, is shown in the west historiography: the intentions of the opposite sides, the degree of preparation to the coming battle, the correlation between number of people and military machines, the realization of decreed tasks, the peculiarities of strategy and moving fighting forces for the battle, the mistakes of German side which were the result of defeat. There are some arguments that the foundation for the forming ideas of western historians about the events on the Soviet German front in summer 1943 is in the workings of captured German generals and officers which were prepared by the task of military – historical service of US army. The workings played the important ideological and methodological role. Trying to excuse themselves these authors explained the defeat of Wehrmacht using some accidental factors which were not connected with their activity as military leaders. In particular there were some mistakes of the highest German political and military leadership, climatic and geographical peculiarities of the war in Russia. In the article the controversial battle Western historians, forms, methods and means of falsification of history and the role of the battle; exposure technique attempts to distort the essence of the events and the outcome of the battle.A. A. PaderinMGIMO University Pressarticlespainiberiaiberiansceltsceltiberiansphoeniciansgreeksindo-european tribesbasquestartessgadescarthagoromeatlantisnationalismseparatismregionalismbasque countrycataloniaandalusiaInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 5(32), Pp 90-99 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	spain iberia iberians celts celtiberians phoenicians greeks indo-european tribes basques tartess gades carthago rome atlantis nationalism separatism regionalism basque country catalonia andalusia International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	spain iberia iberians celts celtiberians phoenicians greeks indo-european tribes basques tartess gades carthago rome atlantis nationalism separatism regionalism basque country catalonia andalusia International relations JZ2-6530 A. A. Paderin THE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT
description	In the article the author analyses how the largest battle of the Great Patriotic War and the second World War, the Battle of Kursk, is shown in the west historiography: the intentions of the opposite sides, the degree of preparation to the coming battle, the correlation between number of people and military machines, the realization of decreed tasks, the peculiarities of strategy and moving fighting forces for the battle, the mistakes of German side which were the result of defeat. There are some arguments that the foundation for the forming ideas of western historians about the events on the Soviet German front in summer 1943 is in the workings of captured German generals and officers which were prepared by the task of military – historical service of US army. The workings played the important ideological and methodological role. Trying to excuse themselves these authors explained the defeat of Wehrmacht using some accidental factors which were not connected with their activity as military leaders. In particular there were some mistakes of the highest German political and military leadership, climatic and geographical peculiarities of the war in Russia. In the article the controversial battle Western historians, forms, methods and means of falsification of history and the role of the battle; exposure technique attempts to distort the essence of the events and the outcome of the battle.
format	article
author	A. A. Paderin
author_facet	A. A. Paderin
author_sort	A. A. Paderin
title	THE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT
title_short	THE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT
title_full	THE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT
title_fullStr	THE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT
title_full_unstemmed	THE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT
title_sort	battle of kursk: how the western historians appreciate it
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/53a75014ed854adc9ecc50c2779060be
work_keys_str_mv	AT aapaderin thebattleofkurskhowthewesternhistoriansappreciateit AT aapaderin battleofkurskhowthewesternhistoriansappreciateit
_version_	1718416393126281216

THE BATTLE OF KURSK: HOW THE WESTERN HISTORIANS APPRECIATE IT

Ejemplares similares