The Effect of Change in Price Limit on Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume -Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)

Financial market crashes in recent decades have given rise to discussions about excessive volatility in these markets. Some authorities recommend price limits as a device to control excessive price swings, arguing that price limits can provide a cooling-off period that allows investors to re-evaluat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad Badri, Maryam Ramezanian
Formato: article
Lenguaje:FA
Publicado: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/53b6747f91bb46109ae926881b265fb6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:53b6747f91bb46109ae926881b265fb6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:53b6747f91bb46109ae926881b265fb62021-11-04T19:40:23ZThe Effect of Change in Price Limit on Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume -Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)2008-89142476-292X10.22103/jak.2010.39https://doaj.org/article/53b6747f91bb46109ae926881b265fb62010-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_39_fcd8bc17c7ac5895c26a3825b1f98f61.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2008-8914https://doaj.org/toc/2476-292XFinancial market crashes in recent decades have given rise to discussions about excessive volatility in these markets. Some authorities recommend price limits as a device to control excessive price swings, arguing that price limits can provide a cooling-off period that allows investors to re-evaluate market information and make more rational decisions during the period of extreme price changes. On the other side, opponents claim that price limits cause volatility to spread out over a longer period of time, harming the price discovery process and liquidity of the market. These different opinions illustrate the lack of consensus on the effectiveness of price limits. This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of price limits by examining stock market characteristics (such as volatility and volume) around the revision of price limit (from 5% to 2% in 1384 and from 2% to 3% in 1387) on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). The main finding of this study is that for the cross-section of stocks, the change in price limits is negatively related to the change in (weekly) volatility and trading volume. That is, price limit mechanism could not effectively reduce volatility in TSE. The second finding of this study is that the effects of the revision in price limit have no relation with size.Ahmad BadriMaryam RamezanianShahid Bahonar University of Kermanarticleprice limitvolatilityvolumesizetehran stock exchangeAccounting. BookkeepingHF5601-5689FAمجله دانش حسابداری, Vol 1, Iss 3, Pp 31-58 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language FA
topic price limit
volatility
volume
size
tehran stock exchange
Accounting. Bookkeeping
HF5601-5689
spellingShingle price limit
volatility
volume
size
tehran stock exchange
Accounting. Bookkeeping
HF5601-5689
Ahmad Badri
Maryam Ramezanian
The Effect of Change in Price Limit on Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume -Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)
description Financial market crashes in recent decades have given rise to discussions about excessive volatility in these markets. Some authorities recommend price limits as a device to control excessive price swings, arguing that price limits can provide a cooling-off period that allows investors to re-evaluate market information and make more rational decisions during the period of extreme price changes. On the other side, opponents claim that price limits cause volatility to spread out over a longer period of time, harming the price discovery process and liquidity of the market. These different opinions illustrate the lack of consensus on the effectiveness of price limits. This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of price limits by examining stock market characteristics (such as volatility and volume) around the revision of price limit (from 5% to 2% in 1384 and from 2% to 3% in 1387) on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). The main finding of this study is that for the cross-section of stocks, the change in price limits is negatively related to the change in (weekly) volatility and trading volume. That is, price limit mechanism could not effectively reduce volatility in TSE. The second finding of this study is that the effects of the revision in price limit have no relation with size.
format article
author Ahmad Badri
Maryam Ramezanian
author_facet Ahmad Badri
Maryam Ramezanian
author_sort Ahmad Badri
title The Effect of Change in Price Limit on Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume -Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)
title_short The Effect of Change in Price Limit on Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume -Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)
title_full The Effect of Change in Price Limit on Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume -Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)
title_fullStr The Effect of Change in Price Limit on Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume -Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Change in Price Limit on Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume -Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)
title_sort effect of change in price limit on stock market volatility and trading volume -evidence from tehran stock exchange (tse)
publisher Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/53b6747f91bb46109ae926881b265fb6
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadbadri theeffectofchangeinpricelimitonstockmarketvolatilityandtradingvolumeevidencefromtehranstockexchangetse
AT maryamramezanian theeffectofchangeinpricelimitonstockmarketvolatilityandtradingvolumeevidencefromtehranstockexchangetse
AT ahmadbadri effectofchangeinpricelimitonstockmarketvolatilityandtradingvolumeevidencefromtehranstockexchangetse
AT maryamramezanian effectofchangeinpricelimitonstockmarketvolatilityandtradingvolumeevidencefromtehranstockexchangetse
_version_ 1718444649410985984