Religious Americans and Political Choices

The Journal of Law and Religion held its 2006 Law, Religion, and Ethics symposium, “Religious Americans and Political Choices,” at Hamline University. The event focused on reframing the divide between the so-called religious “Red State” and secular “Blue State” political discourses. Its objective w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marie A. Failinger
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/53d06a7e6d4e493bb82e56df3b4be7bc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:53d06a7e6d4e493bb82e56df3b4be7bc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:53d06a7e6d4e493bb82e56df3b4be7bc2021-12-02T17:49:40ZReligious Americans and Political Choices10.35632/ajis.v24i3.15412690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/53d06a7e6d4e493bb82e56df3b4be7bc2007-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/1541https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 The Journal of Law and Religion held its 2006 Law, Religion, and Ethics symposium, “Religious Americans and Political Choices,” at Hamline University. The event focused on reframing the divide between the so-called religious “Red State” and secular “Blue State” political discourses. Its objective was to discover what the major American faith traditions share by way of political values and understandings about the critical issues facing the United States, particularly in the areas of race, poverty, environmental protection, and restorative justice. Keynoter David Gushee (Graves Professor of Moral Philosophy, Union University) began with an “insider’s critique” of how evangelicals have allowed political conservatives to capture their commitments on issues that do not fully reflect their broad priorities as Christians. He argued that evangelical Christians should cast a wary eye on politico-religious alignments in accord with their basic principles. Evangelicals, Gushee noted, believe that God is redeeming the world on His own time and that a Christian’s first loyalty must be to Jesus Christ as Lord, not parties, and teaching the Good News as well as loving God and one’s neighbor. This evangelical commitment entails the recognition that political activity cannot redeem the world; but because the world is an arena of moral concern, politics is a necessary (if sinful) part of life. Thus, Christians must seek peace and prosperity for the entire human community, with a consistent ethic of life that embraces those members of the wider world community who have been marginalized. In the panel on race and poverty, David Skeel (professor of law, University of Pennsylvania), an evangelical Christian, continued this theme by discussing the important role that evangelicals and other Christians have played in pursuing debt relief for Africa, despite their traditional suspicion of big government. He called for religious Christians to identify the “moral blind spots of our age” and demand that political leaders recognize the equal worth of every human being, both at home and abroad ... Marie A. FailingerInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 24, Iss 3 (2007)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Marie A. Failinger
Religious Americans and Political Choices
description The Journal of Law and Religion held its 2006 Law, Religion, and Ethics symposium, “Religious Americans and Political Choices,” at Hamline University. The event focused on reframing the divide between the so-called religious “Red State” and secular “Blue State” political discourses. Its objective was to discover what the major American faith traditions share by way of political values and understandings about the critical issues facing the United States, particularly in the areas of race, poverty, environmental protection, and restorative justice. Keynoter David Gushee (Graves Professor of Moral Philosophy, Union University) began with an “insider’s critique” of how evangelicals have allowed political conservatives to capture their commitments on issues that do not fully reflect their broad priorities as Christians. He argued that evangelical Christians should cast a wary eye on politico-religious alignments in accord with their basic principles. Evangelicals, Gushee noted, believe that God is redeeming the world on His own time and that a Christian’s first loyalty must be to Jesus Christ as Lord, not parties, and teaching the Good News as well as loving God and one’s neighbor. This evangelical commitment entails the recognition that political activity cannot redeem the world; but because the world is an arena of moral concern, politics is a necessary (if sinful) part of life. Thus, Christians must seek peace and prosperity for the entire human community, with a consistent ethic of life that embraces those members of the wider world community who have been marginalized. In the panel on race and poverty, David Skeel (professor of law, University of Pennsylvania), an evangelical Christian, continued this theme by discussing the important role that evangelicals and other Christians have played in pursuing debt relief for Africa, despite their traditional suspicion of big government. He called for religious Christians to identify the “moral blind spots of our age” and demand that political leaders recognize the equal worth of every human being, both at home and abroad ...
format article
author Marie A. Failinger
author_facet Marie A. Failinger
author_sort Marie A. Failinger
title Religious Americans and Political Choices
title_short Religious Americans and Political Choices
title_full Religious Americans and Political Choices
title_fullStr Religious Americans and Political Choices
title_full_unstemmed Religious Americans and Political Choices
title_sort religious americans and political choices
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2007
url https://doaj.org/article/53d06a7e6d4e493bb82e56df3b4be7bc
work_keys_str_mv AT marieafailinger religiousamericansandpoliticalchoices
_version_ 1718379408372269056