How outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic scoping review.

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Recovery after intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is often slower than ischemic stroke. Despite this, ICH research often quantifies recovery using the same outcome measures obtained at the same timepoints as ischemic stroke. The primary objective of this scopi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sara Massicotte, Ronda Lun, Vignan Yogendrakumar, Brian Dewar, Hee Sahng Chung, Ricarda Konder, Holly Yim, Alexandra Davis, Dean Fergusson, Michel Shamy, Dar Dowlatshahi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/53ed1ac5bc2044c89926c813ab23c2ac
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:53ed1ac5bc2044c89926c813ab23c2ac
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:53ed1ac5bc2044c89926c813ab23c2ac2021-12-02T20:15:41ZHow outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic scoping review.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253964https://doaj.org/article/53ed1ac5bc2044c89926c813ab23c2ac2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253964https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Recovery after intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is often slower than ischemic stroke. Despite this, ICH research often quantifies recovery using the same outcome measures obtained at the same timepoints as ischemic stroke. The primary objective of this scoping review is to map the existing literature to determine when and how outcomes are being measured in prospective studies of recovery after ICH.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science from inception to November 2019, for prospective studies that included patients with ICH. Two investigators independently screened the studies and extracted data around timing and type of outcome assessment.<h4>Results</h4>Among the 9761 manuscripts reviewed, 395 met inclusion criteria, of which 276 were observational studies and 129 were interventional studies that enrolled 66274 patients. Mortality was assessed in 93% of studies. Functional outcomes were assessed in 85% of studies. The most frequently used functional assessment tool was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (60%), followed by the National Institute of Health Stroke Severity Scale (22%) and Barthel Index (21%). The most frequent timepoint at which mortality was assessed was 90 days (41%), followed by 180 days (18%) and 365 days (12%), with 2% beyond 1 year. The most frequent timepoint used for assessing mRS was 90 days (62%), followed by 180 days (21%) and 365 days (17%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>While most prospective ICH studies report mortality and functional outcomes only at 90 days, a significant proportion do so at 1 year and beyond. Our results support the feasibility of collecting long-term outcome data to optimally assess recovery in ICH.Sara MassicotteRonda LunVignan YogendrakumarBrian DewarHee Sahng ChungRicarda KonderHolly YimAlexandra DavisDean FergussonMichel ShamyDar DowlatshahiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0253964 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sara Massicotte
Ronda Lun
Vignan Yogendrakumar
Brian Dewar
Hee Sahng Chung
Ricarda Konder
Holly Yim
Alexandra Davis
Dean Fergusson
Michel Shamy
Dar Dowlatshahi
How outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic scoping review.
description <h4>Background and purpose</h4>Recovery after intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is often slower than ischemic stroke. Despite this, ICH research often quantifies recovery using the same outcome measures obtained at the same timepoints as ischemic stroke. The primary objective of this scoping review is to map the existing literature to determine when and how outcomes are being measured in prospective studies of recovery after ICH.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science from inception to November 2019, for prospective studies that included patients with ICH. Two investigators independently screened the studies and extracted data around timing and type of outcome assessment.<h4>Results</h4>Among the 9761 manuscripts reviewed, 395 met inclusion criteria, of which 276 were observational studies and 129 were interventional studies that enrolled 66274 patients. Mortality was assessed in 93% of studies. Functional outcomes were assessed in 85% of studies. The most frequently used functional assessment tool was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (60%), followed by the National Institute of Health Stroke Severity Scale (22%) and Barthel Index (21%). The most frequent timepoint at which mortality was assessed was 90 days (41%), followed by 180 days (18%) and 365 days (12%), with 2% beyond 1 year. The most frequent timepoint used for assessing mRS was 90 days (62%), followed by 180 days (21%) and 365 days (17%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>While most prospective ICH studies report mortality and functional outcomes only at 90 days, a significant proportion do so at 1 year and beyond. Our results support the feasibility of collecting long-term outcome data to optimally assess recovery in ICH.
format article
author Sara Massicotte
Ronda Lun
Vignan Yogendrakumar
Brian Dewar
Hee Sahng Chung
Ricarda Konder
Holly Yim
Alexandra Davis
Dean Fergusson
Michel Shamy
Dar Dowlatshahi
author_facet Sara Massicotte
Ronda Lun
Vignan Yogendrakumar
Brian Dewar
Hee Sahng Chung
Ricarda Konder
Holly Yim
Alexandra Davis
Dean Fergusson
Michel Shamy
Dar Dowlatshahi
author_sort Sara Massicotte
title How outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic scoping review.
title_short How outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic scoping review.
title_full How outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic scoping review.
title_fullStr How outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed How outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic scoping review.
title_sort how outcomes are measured after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic scoping review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/53ed1ac5bc2044c89926c813ab23c2ac
work_keys_str_mv AT saramassicotte howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT rondalun howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT vignanyogendrakumar howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT briandewar howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT heesahngchung howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT ricardakonder howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT hollyyim howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT alexandradavis howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT deanfergusson howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT michelshamy howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
AT dardowlatshahi howoutcomesaremeasuredafterspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageasystematicscopingreview
_version_ 1718374525066805248