Recontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature

Abstract In this paper, we brought compelling clarities as to why the current practices of binomial nomenclature should be revised and adjusted by the scientific governing bodies. We highlighted the current emphasis on Latinisation and Greek forms for scientific names has given fewer possibilities f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paul Rummy, Jessica Thevamalar Rummy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Springer Nature 2021
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/53f5f95271a34ee7afdaa4c390d15b73
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:53f5f95271a34ee7afdaa4c390d15b73
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:53f5f95271a34ee7afdaa4c390d15b732021-11-21T12:28:30ZRecontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature10.1057/s41599-021-00975-82662-9992https://doaj.org/article/53f5f95271a34ee7afdaa4c390d15b732021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00975-8https://doaj.org/toc/2662-9992Abstract In this paper, we brought compelling clarities as to why the current practices of binomial nomenclature should be revised and adjusted by the scientific governing bodies. We highlighted the current emphasis on Latinisation and Greek forms for scientific names has given fewer possibilities for the inclusion of cultural and native scientific names. With regard to zoological matters, we further pointed out that the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) has an obligation to rationalise the applicability and suitability of the existing Articles and Recommendations in the Code. The Code has been designed to assist scientists in naming an organism with its guidelines. However, the practicality of the Articles and Recommendations need to be further explained in order to reduce several misperceptions within the scientific community; which include the correct usage of Latinised and Greek language forms that can be quite confusing to those who are not well-versed in the structures. The discussion also underlined the novelty of having more localised and hybridised scientific names, and the necessity to avoid norms of abusive, offensive and colonising names since the Code did not emphasise enough on the level of integrity needed with the naming procedures. We further illustrated the magnitude of having a gender-neutral naming system in the world of nomenclature, as the current practices of Latinised and Greek forms are heavily navigated towards masculine naming styles. We also suggest that the non-compulsory Recommendation section of the Code to be made relevant, and perhaps mandatory in some cases, with an infinite approach to accentuate beyond inclusivity and diversity.Paul RummyJessica Thevamalar RummySpringer NaturearticleHistory of scholarship and learning. The humanitiesAZ20-999Social SciencesHENHumanities & Social Sciences Communications, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic History of scholarship and learning. The humanities
AZ20-999
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle History of scholarship and learning. The humanities
AZ20-999
Social Sciences
H
Paul Rummy
Jessica Thevamalar Rummy
Recontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature
description Abstract In this paper, we brought compelling clarities as to why the current practices of binomial nomenclature should be revised and adjusted by the scientific governing bodies. We highlighted the current emphasis on Latinisation and Greek forms for scientific names has given fewer possibilities for the inclusion of cultural and native scientific names. With regard to zoological matters, we further pointed out that the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) has an obligation to rationalise the applicability and suitability of the existing Articles and Recommendations in the Code. The Code has been designed to assist scientists in naming an organism with its guidelines. However, the practicality of the Articles and Recommendations need to be further explained in order to reduce several misperceptions within the scientific community; which include the correct usage of Latinised and Greek language forms that can be quite confusing to those who are not well-versed in the structures. The discussion also underlined the novelty of having more localised and hybridised scientific names, and the necessity to avoid norms of abusive, offensive and colonising names since the Code did not emphasise enough on the level of integrity needed with the naming procedures. We further illustrated the magnitude of having a gender-neutral naming system in the world of nomenclature, as the current practices of Latinised and Greek forms are heavily navigated towards masculine naming styles. We also suggest that the non-compulsory Recommendation section of the Code to be made relevant, and perhaps mandatory in some cases, with an infinite approach to accentuate beyond inclusivity and diversity.
format article
author Paul Rummy
Jessica Thevamalar Rummy
author_facet Paul Rummy
Jessica Thevamalar Rummy
author_sort Paul Rummy
title Recontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature
title_short Recontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature
title_full Recontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature
title_fullStr Recontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature
title_full_unstemmed Recontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature
title_sort recontextualising the style of naming in nomenclature
publisher Springer Nature
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/53f5f95271a34ee7afdaa4c390d15b73
work_keys_str_mv AT paulrummy recontextualisingthestyleofnaminginnomenclature
AT jessicathevamalarrummy recontextualisingthestyleofnaminginnomenclature
_version_ 1718419006791090176