Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population

Abstract We investigated addition of strain and shear wave elastography to conventional ultrasonography for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score for differentiating between benign and maligna...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hyo Jin Kim, Sun Mi Kim, Bohyoung Kim, Bo La Yun, Mijung Jang, Yousun Ko, Soo Hyun Lee, Heeyeong Jeong, Jung Min Chang, Nariya Cho
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5417b36de0594ae8a1bc5264a037988b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5417b36de0594ae8a1bc5264a037988b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5417b36de0594ae8a1bc5264a037988b2021-12-02T15:07:45ZComparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population10.1038/s41598-018-24377-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/5417b36de0594ae8a1bc5264a037988b2018-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24377-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We investigated addition of strain and shear wave elastography to conventional ultrasonography for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score for differentiating between benign and malignant masses. In all, 108 masses from 94 patients were evaluated with strain and shear wave elastography and scored for suspicion of malignancy, visual score, strain ratio, and elasticity ratio. The diagnostic performance between ultrasonography alone and ultrasonography combined with either type of elastography was compared; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score. Of the 108 masses, 44 were malignant and 64 were benign. The areas under the curves were significantly higher for strain and shear wave elastography-supplemented ultrasonography (0.839 and 0.826, respectively; P = 0.656) than for ultrasonography alone (0.764; P = 0.018 and 0.035, respectively). The diagnostic performances of strain and elasticity ratios were similar when differentiating benign from malignant masses. Cut-off values for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual scores for strain and shear wave elastography were 2.93, 4, 3, and 2, respectively. Both forms of elastography similarly improved the diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasonography in the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses.Hyo Jin KimSun Mi KimBohyoung KimBo La YunMijung JangYousun KoSoo Hyun LeeHeeyeong JeongJung Min ChangNariya ChoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Hyo Jin Kim Sun Mi Kim Bohyoung Kim Bo La Yun Mijung Jang Yousun Ko Soo Hyun Lee Heeyeong Jeong Jung Min Chang Nariya Cho Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population
description	Abstract We investigated addition of strain and shear wave elastography to conventional ultrasonography for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score for differentiating between benign and malignant masses. In all, 108 masses from 94 patients were evaluated with strain and shear wave elastography and scored for suspicion of malignancy, visual score, strain ratio, and elasticity ratio. The diagnostic performance between ultrasonography alone and ultrasonography combined with either type of elastography was compared; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score. Of the 108 masses, 44 were malignant and 64 were benign. The areas under the curves were significantly higher for strain and shear wave elastography-supplemented ultrasonography (0.839 and 0.826, respectively; P = 0.656) than for ultrasonography alone (0.764; P = 0.018 and 0.035, respectively). The diagnostic performances of strain and elasticity ratios were similar when differentiating benign from malignant masses. Cut-off values for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual scores for strain and shear wave elastography were 2.93, 4, 3, and 2, respectively. Both forms of elastography similarly improved the diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasonography in the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses.
format	article
author	Hyo Jin Kim Sun Mi Kim Bohyoung Kim Bo La Yun Mijung Jang Yousun Ko Soo Hyun Lee Heeyeong Jeong Jung Min Chang Nariya Cho
author_facet	Hyo Jin Kim Sun Mi Kim Bohyoung Kim Bo La Yun Mijung Jang Yousun Ko Soo Hyun Lee Heeyeong Jeong Jung Min Chang Nariya Cho
author_sort	Hyo Jin Kim
title	Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population
title_short	Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population
title_full	Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population
title_fullStr	Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population
title_sort	comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/5417b36de0594ae8a1bc5264a037988b
work_keys_str_mv	AT hyojinkim comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT sunmikim comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT bohyoungkim comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT bolayun comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT mijungjang comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT yousunko comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT soohyunlee comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT heeyeongjeong comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT jungminchang comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation AT nariyacho comparisonofstrainandshearwaveelastographyforqualitativeandquantitativeassessmentofbreastmassesinthesamepopulation
_version_	1718388385086701568

Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population

Ejemplares similares