Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale

The aim of this three-study report was to validate the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale and to further embed the constructs of promotive and prohibitive voice within their nomological network. Promotive voice refers to the expression of suggestions for improving work practi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Roy B. L. Sijbom, Jessie Koen
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:	validation employee voice measurement invariance reliability nomological network Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5488d99aee5c490399afa33f01a79748
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5488d99aee5c490399afa33f01a79748
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5488d99aee5c490399afa33f01a797482021-12-01T02:12:21ZPsychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale1664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.722238https://doaj.org/article/5488d99aee5c490399afa33f01a797482021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722238/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-1078The aim of this three-study report was to validate the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale and to further embed the constructs of promotive and prohibitive voice within their nomological network. Promotive voice refers to the expression of suggestions for improving work practices, whereas prohibitive voice refers to the expression of concerns about practices and behaviors that are detrimental. In Study 1 (N = 121), confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) provided evidence for the two-factor structure, which was replicated in the other two studies. In Study 2 (NT1 = 209/NT2 = 107), we investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale, and tested measurement invariance across gender and time. Results provided validity evidence, partial scalar invariance for gender, and scalar invariance across time. In Study 3 (N = 149), we expanded the nomological network of the promotive and prohibitive voice scales through their relationship with personal initiative, approach temperament, and risk propensity. Taken together, our results provide strong evidence for the validity of the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale.Roy B. L. SijbomJessie KoenFrontiers Media S.A.articlevalidationemployee voicemeasurement invariancereliabilitynomological networkPsychologyBF1-990ENFrontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	validation employee voice measurement invariance reliability nomological network Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	validation employee voice measurement invariance reliability nomological network Psychology BF1-990 Roy B. L. Sijbom Jessie Koen Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale
description	The aim of this three-study report was to validate the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale and to further embed the constructs of promotive and prohibitive voice within their nomological network. Promotive voice refers to the expression of suggestions for improving work practices, whereas prohibitive voice refers to the expression of concerns about practices and behaviors that are detrimental. In Study 1 (N = 121), confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) provided evidence for the two-factor structure, which was replicated in the other two studies. In Study 2 (NT1 = 209/NT2 = 107), we investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale, and tested measurement invariance across gender and time. Results provided validity evidence, partial scalar invariance for gender, and scalar invariance across time. In Study 3 (N = 149), we expanded the nomological network of the promotive and prohibitive voice scales through their relationship with personal initiative, approach temperament, and risk propensity. Taken together, our results provide strong evidence for the validity of the Dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale.
format	article
author	Roy B. L. Sijbom Jessie Koen
author_facet	Roy B. L. Sijbom Jessie Koen
author_sort	Roy B. L. Sijbom
title	Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale
title_short	Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale
title_full	Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale
title_fullStr	Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale
title_full_unstemmed	Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale
title_sort	psychometric validation of the dutch version of the promotive and prohibitive voice scale
publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/5488d99aee5c490399afa33f01a79748
work_keys_str_mv	AT royblsijbom psychometricvalidationofthedutchversionofthepromotiveandprohibitivevoicescale AT jessiekoen psychometricvalidationofthedutchversionofthepromotiveandprohibitivevoicescale
_version_	1718405901953531904

Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale

Ejemplares similares